Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Florence S Mahoney Foundation Co Antley & Lopez LLP

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$160k
Granted FY2024still arriving
27
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of THE FLORENCE S MAHONEY FOUNDATION CO ANTLEY & LOPEZ LLP’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $80k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $80k
$5,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST HELENA CA$15,000
SPECIAL K RANCH$15,000
SAWTOOTH VALLEY RURAL FIRE DISTRICT$10,000
ANGELITOS SANCTUARIO INC$10,000
UCA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION$10,000
WET NOSES RESCUE$10,000
AMIGOS DE ANIMALES DE SAN MIGUEL DE$10,000
PHYSICIAN'S COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIB$6,000
BOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER$5,000
THE ESSELSTYN FAMILY FOUNDATION$5,000
THE SALMON RIVER CLINIC$5,000
ADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE OF YELLOWST$5,000
DARTMOUTH-HITCHCOCK HEALTH$5,000
NUTRITIONFACTSORG$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $40k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%BOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER: $5k → 10%YOUTH HOMES INC: $10k → 9%BOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER: $5k → 10%BOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER: $5k → 10%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $10k → 10%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
CT
CA
VA
MD
NC
DC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 17% of The Florence S Mahoney Foundation Co Antley & Lopez LLP’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Florence S Mahoney Foundation Co Antley & Lopez LLPlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 9.8% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$549k · 32 repeat orgs$208k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -10% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
21

Total granted

$549k
$168k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-10%

Still filing today

56%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 75% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationFood & NutritionHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DC
    DANVILLE CHILDRENS GUILD
    3× · 2021–2023 · $42k · revenue +209%
  • KS
    KENT SCHOOL
    3× · 2020–2022 · $30k · revenue +9%
  • SHELBURNE FARMS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPARD
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
    one grant, 2022 · $16k · revenue -10%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIF SAN FRANCSCO FD
    one grant, 2020 · $15k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Pacific Medical Center Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
2
Foodbank of Santa Barbara County Inc

To end hunger and transform the health of our community by providing nourishment to those in need by acquiring and distributing safe nutritious food via local agencies and by providing education to solve hunger and nutritional problems in…

Food & Nutrition
3
Second Harvest Food Bank Santa Cruz County

Second harvest food bank's mission is to end hunger and malnutrition by educating and involving the community.

Food & Nutrition
4
The Plantrician Project

To educate, equip & empower physicians & other healthcare providers about the benefits of plant-based nutrition, to produce resources to inform & inspire their patients to shift to a whole food, plant-based way of living.

Science & Tech
5
California Association of Food Banks

California association of food banks (cafb) is a non-profit public benefit corporation located in oakland, california. together with its 41-member foodbanks, cafb is the largest charitable hunger-relief and anti-hunger leader in the state.…

Food & Nutrition
6
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
7
Mills-Peninsula Hospital Foundation

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Sansum Clinic

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Sutter Coast Hospital

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
10
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
11
Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition
12
Physician Affiliate Group of New York Pc

To provide accountable, responsive quality care with the highest degree of sensitivity to the needs of our diverse, multilingual population while fulfilling the professional and educational needs of our members.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Esselstyn Family Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionPregnancy Support ServicesDevelopmental Disabilities …Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…Child and Family ServicesSenior Support ServicesCommunity Health CentersYouth Development CentersLand Conservation Organizat…Domestic Violence Crisis Se…School Parent OrganizationsFood Pantries & AssistanceIndependent K-8 SchoolsCancer Support OrganizationsChristian Missionary Organi…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%20%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%7%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%31%10–20yr16%15%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%18%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/29
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,536

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UCA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION — $37,000 · OtherUCA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATIONSAWTOOTH VALLEY RURAL FIRE DISTRICT — $30,000 · OtherSAWTOOTH VALLEY RURAL FIRE DISTRICTCHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPARD — $30,000 · OtherCHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPARDTHE SALMON RIVER CLINIC — $25,000 · OtherTHE SALMON RIVER CLINICPHYSICIAN'S COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIB — $21,000 · OtherTHE STANLEY SCHOOL PARENTS ASSOCIAT — $20,000 · OtherADULT RESOURCE ALLIANCE OF YELLOWST — $20,000 · OtherHOBE SOUND CHILD CARE INC — $16,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CALIF SAN FRANCSCO FD — $15,000 · OtherAMIGOS DE ANIMALES DE SAN MIGUEL DE — $15,000 · OtherSPECIAL K RANCH — $15,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST HELENA CA — $15,000 · OtherTHE MCDOUGALL RESEARCH EDUCATION FN — $15,000 · OtherSHELBURNE FARMS — $25,000 · OtherSHELBURNE FARMSWET NOSES RESCUE — $15,000 · Other+20 more — $127,000 · Other+20 moreDartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $20,000 · HealthDartmouth-Hit…PLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP — $19,000 · HealthPLANT BASED N…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $16,000 · HealthPLANNED PAREN…PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $10,000 · HealthPANCREATIC CA…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 · HealthTHE SHRINERS'…The Esselstyn Family Foundation Inc — $10,000 · HealthThe Esselstyn…PM HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · HealthPM HOSPITAL F…+1 more — $2,000 · HealthBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC — $53,000 · PhilanthropyHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC — $2,000 · PhilanthropyKENT SCHOOL — $30,000 · EducationNAPA VALLEY FARMWORKER FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationSTANLEY SCHOOL PARENTS ASSOCIATION INCORPORATED — $5,000 · EducationDANVILLE CHILDRENS GUILD — $42,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY — $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentGRATEFUL GATHERINGS — $15,000 · Human ServicesBOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER — $15,000 · Human ServicesYouth Homes Inc — $10,000 · Human ServicesNutritionfactsorg Inc — $15,000 · Food & NutritionBillings Food Bank Inc — $15,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $5,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$441,000Health$92,000Philanthropy$55,000Education$50,000Youth Development$44,000Human Services$40,000Food & Nutrition$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC — $53,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetDANVILLE CHILDRENS GUILD — $42,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetKENT SCHOOL — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHELBURNE FARMS — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDartmouth-Hitchcock Health — $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP — $19,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC — $16,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGRATEFUL GATHERINGS — $15,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetNutritionfactsorg Inc — $15,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBillings Food Bank Inc — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER — $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetWET NOSES RESCUE — $15,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetSPECIAL K RANCH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNAPA VALLEY FARMWORKER FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAngelitos Sanctuario Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetDO IT FOR THE LOVE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYouth Homes Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Esselstyn Family Foundation Inc — $10,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC — $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPM HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOBE SOUND COMMUNITY CHEST INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARTIN COUNTY — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUPITER ISLAND MEDICAL CLINIC INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BANDERAS BAY CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds DANVILLE CHILDRENS GUILD
  • Who funds KENT SCHOOL
  • Who funds SHELBURNE FARMS
  • Who funds Dartmouth-Hitchcock Health
  • Who funds PLANT BASED NUTRITION SUPPORT GROUP
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds GRATEFUL GATHERINGS
  • Who funds Nutritionfactsorg Inc
  • Who funds Billings Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds BOZEMAN SENIOR SOCIAL CENTER
  • Who funds WET NOSES RESCUE
  • Who funds SPECIAL K RANCH
  • Who funds NAPA VALLEY FARMWORKER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds PANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC
  • Who funds Angelitos Sanctuario Inc
  • Who funds DO IT FOR THE LOVE
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
  • Who funds Youth Homes Inc
  • Who funds The Esselstyn Family Foundation Inc
  • Who funds THE DREAMYARD PROJECT INC
  • Who funds HAVEN

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN14.7× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Florence S Mahoney Foundation Co Antley & Lopez LLP funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children6% of income from government
  • Shelburne Farms3% of income from government
  • Boys & Girls Club of Martin County2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Florence S Mahoney Foundation Co Antley & Lopez LLP?

Find your warmest path to The Florence S Mahoney Foundation Co Antley & Lopez LLP through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 56 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph