Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Figgie Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$707k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$450k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$3.3MRecreation & Sports$3.0MEducation$755kYouth Development$710kReligion$286kHuman Services$184kHealth$87kPhilanthropy$21kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $145k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
  • $250k+1 grant · $450k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAIRMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS$450,000
COATS FOR KIDS$85,000
THE HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATION$40,000
ANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY$32,200
MAGNIFICAT HIGH SCHOOL$30,000
GILMOUR ACADEMY$13,000
GREAT LAKES SCIENCE CENTER$10,000
NOTHERN OHIO GOLF CHARITIES FOUNDATION$10,000
COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
THE LITTLEST HEROES$5,000
A KID AT ART FOR THE HEART INC$5,000
THE KAULIG FOUNDATION$3,983
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ABILIS INC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 21 repeat orgs$386k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
13

Total granted

$8.0M
$336k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+10%

Still filing today

48%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $50k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHealthHuman ServicesPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $85k · revenue +19%
  • AO
    ANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY
    3× · 2021–2025 · $76k · revenue +37%
  • OC
    OHIO CONTEMPORARY BALLET
    3× · 2018–2022 · $40k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • UP
    UH PARTNERSHIP FOR FAMILIES
    one grant, 2017 · $99k
  • GA
    GILMOUR ACADEMY - MUSIC ROOM RENOVATION
    one grant, 2020 · $68k
  • SC
    ST CHRISTOPHER'S BY-THE-RIVER
    one grant, 2022 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cleveland Museum of Art

The mission of the cleveland museum of art (cma) is to fulfill its dual roles as one of the world's most distinguished comprehensive art museums and as one of northeastern ohio's principal civic and cultural institutions. the museum,…

Arts & Culture
2
Cleveland Institute of Music

The cleveland institute of music's mission is to empower the world's most talented classical music students to fulfill their dreams and potential.

Education
3
Center for Arts-Inspired Learning

Cal champions creative learning, drives educational innovation, and transforms lives through collaborative efforts involving teaching artists, students, educators, and communities.

Education
4
Cleveland Arts Prize

The cleveland arts prize identifies, rewards, publicly honors and promotes those creative artists whose original work and accomplishments have set a standard of excellence to which other artists can aspire. additionally, the cleveland arts…

Arts & Culture
5
Cleveland Leadership Center

The mission of cleveland leadership center (the organization) is to build a continuum of civic leaders committed to our community's excellence by serving as a catalyst for civic engagement. the organization achieves its mission by…

Education
6
Ballet Metropolitan Inc

Balletmet will celebrate dance by engaging the community through quality performances, instruction, education programs, and creation of new work.

Arts & Culture
7
The Cleveland Institute of Art

The mission statement of the cleveland institute of art is as follows: to cultivate creative leaders who inspire people, strengthen communities, and contribute to a thriving and sustainable economy through an innovative education in art…

Education
8
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture
9
The Cleveland Foundation

Enhance the lives of all residents of greater cleveland, now and for generations to come, by working together with our donors to build community endowment, address needs through grantmaking, and provide leadership on key community issues.

Philanthropy
10
Greater Columbus Arts Council

Mission: to champion and elevate the arts and cultural expression of greater columbus.vision: power of art realized. people engaged. city energized.

Arts & Culture
11
The Cleveland Modern Dance Association

To be a national model for how a presenting organization serves its community, leveraging the worlds best modern and contemporary dance to inspire and educate audiences, local dancers, and community members.

—
12
Global Cleveland

Global cleveland is dedicated to growing northeast ohio's economy by welcoming and connecting international people to opportunities and fostering a more inviting community for those seeking a place to call home.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Urban Community School; the most unlike its peers is Kaulig Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GILMOUR ACADEMY - FIGGIE FIELD BALLPARK: $2,731,879 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY - FIGGIE FIELD BALLPARKFAIRMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $2,494,765 · OtherFAIRMOUNT CENTER FOR THE ARTSCOATS FOR KIDS: $710,000 · OtherCOATS FOR KIDSGILMOUR ACADEMY - STEINWAY: $652,386 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY - STEINWAYGILMOUR ACADEMY INC: $525,000 · OtherGILMOUR ACADEMY INC+21 more: $918,631 · Other+21 moreANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY: $75,900 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $20,000 · EducationTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $85,000 · Public BenefitTHE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT: $20,000 · Arts & CultureCLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC: $19,750 · Arts & CultureA KID AT ART FOR THE HEART INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $100 · Arts & CultureKAULIG FOUNDATION: $21,363 · PhilanthropyNORTHERN OHIO GOLF CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE LITTLEST HEROES INC: $5,000 · HealthABILIS INC: $2,000 · HealthSHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$8,032,661Education$120,900Public Benefit$85,000Arts & Culture$44,850Philanthropy$41,363Health$7,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS COMMISSION: $175,000 over 4y, 2.0% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $85,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY: $75,900 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOHIO CONTEMPORARY BALLET: $40,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL: $23,550 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKAULIG FOUNDATION: $21,363 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCOLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN OHIO GOLF CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC: $19,750 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGROUNDWORKS DANCE THEATER: $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetA KID AT ART FOR THE HEART INC: $5,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetABILIS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND SPORTS COMMISSION ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ANDREWS OSBORNE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds THE HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CONTEMPORARY BALLET ↗
  • Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds URBAN COMMUNITY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds KAULIG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND MUSIC SCHOOL SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGE NOW GREATER CLEVELAND INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN OHIO GOLF CHARITIES FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND PUBLIC THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds GROUNDWORKS DANCE THEATER ↗
  • Who funds THE LITTLEST HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOES AND CLOTHES FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds A KID AT ART FOR THE HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds ABILIS INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Cleveland FoundationOH23.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Cleveland Foundation · John P Murphy Foundation · The Laub Foundation · The Char and Chuck Fowler Family Foundation · The O'Neill Brothers Foundation · Jack Joseph & Morton Mandel Foundation · The Swagelok Foundation · The George Gund Foundation · Jewish Federation of Cleveland · The Covia Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Blackbaud Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Figgie Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Figgie Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 74%
  • Abilis Inc: 74% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Figgie Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Figgie Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Figgie’s filings →

More from the funding graph