Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ferraiuolo Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$236k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$176k
Largest
01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$948kHuman Services$207kFood & Nutrition$10kRecreation & Sports$9kHealth$7kHousing & Shelter$5kCrime & Legal$1kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $21k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $39k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $176k
$5,750
Median grant
1
States reached
$5.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GONZAGA UNIVERSITY$175,717
YMCA$38,850
Individual grant recipient$6,000
VANESSA BEHAN CRISIS NURSERY$5,750
YWCA SPOKANE$5,000
FEED SPOKANE$2,750
WISHING STAR FOUNDATION$1,000
FRANKLIN APPLE PROGRAM$700
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS: $205 → 12%FEED SPOKANE: $3k → 12%FEED SPOKANE: $3k → 12%FEED SPOKANE: $2k → 12%FEED SPOKANE: $2k → 12%YWCA SPOKANE: $5k → 12%YWCA SPOKANE: $5k → 12%YWCA SPOKANE: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 13 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against -28% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
13

Total granted

$1.2M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
-28%

Still filing today

46%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $947k · revenue +42%
  • VB
    VANESSA BEHAN
    5× · 2020–2025 · $27k · revenue +1%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $15k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • Y
    YWCA
    one grant, 2021 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Visit Spokane

The mission of Visit Spokane is to help promote economic development for Spokane County through tourism and tourism promotion.

2
Spokane Turbine Center Dba Parkwater Foundation
3
Spokane Parks Foundation

The Spokane Parks Foundation cultivates the health, growth, and continued enjoyment of our communities by inspiring giving and passion for our parks.

4
Community Health Association of Spokane

The mission of the Community Health Association of Spokane (CHAS Health) is to improve the overall health of the communities we serve by expanding access to quality health and wellness services.

Health
5
Spokane Humane Society

The vision of Spokane Humane Society is to enrich the lives of animals and their companions through Support, Education, Advocacy and Love (SEAL). As the oldest local non-profit in Spokane, we have been serving companion animals in need and…

Animals
6
United Way of Spokane County

The mission of Spokane County United Way is to mobilize our community resources to create measurable results that improve the lives of the people living in our community and advance the idea of the common good. (Continued on Schedule O)Our…

Philanthropy
7
Spokane Regional Chamber of Commerce

The Spokane Regional Chamber of Commerce, dba Greater Spokane, Incorporated, primary mission is to lead transformative business and community initiatives to build a robust regional economy.

8
Invest in Washington Now Campaign

Advocate for tax policy in Washington State

9
Greater Spokane Valley Chamber of Commerce

Committed to fostering relationships between members and the community. to serve the interest of members by acting as a catalyst for a vibrant sustainable economy.

10
Spokane Public Radio

The mission of Spokane Public Radio is to provide high-quality, artistic, educational and informational radio programming, which enhances and enlivens the cultural life and civic discourse of its listening communities. Spokane Public Radio…

Arts & Culture
11
Spokane Regional Sports Commission

Economic and community development through sport tourism. bid to host and create major sporting events, and facility consultation and optimization.

12
Spokane Area Workforce Development Council

The SWC mobilizes partnerships, data-driven innovation,and strategic investment to build an equitable workforce ecosystem where every individual can access opportunity, every business can find talent, and every community can thrive.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spokane Neighborhood Action Partners and the most unlike its peers is Spokane District Dental Society Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $946,632 · EducationCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY+2 more — $1,500 · EducationYMCA — $113,670 · OtherYMCAYMCA OF THE INLAND NORTHWEST — $41,500 · OtherYMCA OF THE INLAND N…Individual grant recipient — $15,650 · OtherIndividual grant rec…CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF EASTERN WASHINGTON — $8,566 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $8,015 · Other+11 more — $27,479 · Other+11 moreVANESSA BEHAN — $26,812 · Crime & LegalTHE JONAH PROJECT — $1,250 · Crime & LegalYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $15,000 · Human ServicesFeed Spokane — $8,750 · Human Services+1 more — $205 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER — $1,000 · Civil RightsSpokane District Dental Society Foundation — $500 · HealthSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC — $50 · Health
Education$948,132Other$214,880Crime & Legal$28,062Human Services$23,955Civil Rights$1,000Health$550

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY — $946,632 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVANESSA BEHAN — $26,812 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFeed Spokane — $8,750 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWISHING STAR FOUNDATION — $6,100 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE JONAH PROJECT — $1,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetWASHINGTON POLICY CENTER — $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEastern Washington University Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpokane District Dental Society Foundation — $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIBRARY FOUNDATION OF SPOKANE COUNTY — $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS — $205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CORPORATION OF GONZAGA UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds VANESSA BEHAN
  • Who funds YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Feed Spokane
  • Who funds WISHING STAR FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE JONAH PROJECT
  • Who funds WASHINGTON POLICY CENTER
  • Who funds Eastern Washington University Foundation
  • Who funds Spokane District Dental Society Foundation
  • Who funds LIBRARY FOUNDATION OF SPOKANE COUNTY
  • Who funds SPOKANE NEIGHBORHOOD ACTION PARTNERS
  • Who funds STOP SOLDIER SUICIDE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Avista FoundationWA19.7× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Innovia Foundation · Multicare Health System · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Spokane Teachers Credit Union · Women Helping Women Fund · Numerica Credit Union · Providence Health & Services - Washington · Umpqua Bank Charitable Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ferraiuolo Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph