Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Faf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$15k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

International$279kEducation$66kCivil Rights$18kFood & Nutrition$17kReligion$13kPhilanthropy$13kCommunity Improvement$3kHuman Services$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAICES$5,000
ARVD FOUNDATION$5,000
NOURISHING HOPELAKEVIEW PANTRY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%KOENIG RUBLOFF CARES FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%KOENIG RUBLOFF CARES FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%KOENIG RUBLOFF CARES FOUNDATION: $2k → 14%KOENIG RUBLOFF CARES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%KOENIG RUBLOFF CARES FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%WHEELER MISSION: $400 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $250 → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $100 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IN
OH
PA
AZ
TN
SC
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$131k · 24 repeat orgs$284k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
14

Total granted

$131k
$279k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+44%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $20k · revenue +175%
  • NH
    NOURISHING HOPE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $15k · revenue +43%
  • OM
    ONE MILLION DEGREES
    2× · 2017–2018 · $13k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • ME
    MICHAEL E AND JANET S THYEN FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $244k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SE
    ST ELIZABETH SETON CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Chicago Food Depository

The greater chicago food depository is the nonprofit food bank serving cook county. our mission - is to end hunger. we believe food is a basic human right. to achieve our mission, we work in partnership with a network of community-based…

Food & Nutrition
2
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
3
The Indianapolis Foundation Inc

To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.

Community Improvement
4
Colorado Gives Foundation

We connect people, ideas, and nonprofits to make good happen. our vision is that all of jeffco is thriving.

Philanthropy
5
Cicp Foundation Inc

Cicp foundation, inc. (the foundation) operates exclusively for the benefit of and carries out the mission of central indiana corporate partnership, inc. (cicp) by engaging in and supporting activities in furtherance of purposes that are…

Community Improvement
6
The Minneapolis Foundation

The foundation cultivates generosity by taking action on the greatest civic, social, and economic needs partnering with nonprofits, facilitating grantmaking, driving research and advocacy, and providing services to donors seeking to make a…

Philanthropy
7
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
8
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
9
Second Harvest North Central Food Bank

Engaging the community to end hunger

10
Aarp Foundation

Aarp foundation creates and advances effective solutions to reduce poverty for and with older adults.see schedule oaarp foundation (the "foundation") works for and with vulnerable people over 50 to end senior poverty and reduce financial…

Human Services
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

12
Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rainbow Railroad Usa Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Arvd Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr18%19%10–20yr18%19%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr17%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr18%32%10–20yr18%24%20–35yr14%30%35–55yr17%13%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/24
the rest of the field
13%
8,396/62,555

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHAEL E AND JANET S THYEN FUND — $244,000 · OtherMICHAEL E AND JANET S THYEN FUNDNOURISHING HOPE — $15,000 · OtherXAVIER UNIVERSITY ANNUAL FUND — $10,750 · Other+24 more — $49,682 · Other+24 moreREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $18,000 · Civil RightsHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 · Civil RightsRAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE ARVD FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $3,250 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $2,800 · PhilanthropyONE MILLION DEGREES — $12,500 · EducationALPHA SIGMA PHI FOUNDATION INC — $10,500 · EducationKindness Foundation — $7,000 · Human ServicesWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $750 · Human ServicesKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC — $1,950 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $1,500 · Community ImprovementSECOND HELPINGS INC — $900 · Food & Nutrition
Other$319,432Civil Rights$33,000Philanthropy$31,050Education$23,000Human Services$7,750Community Improvement$3,450Food & Nutrition$900

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $18,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNOURISHING HOPE — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetONE MILLION DEGREES — $12,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetALPHA SIGMA PHI FOUNDATION INC — $10,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKindness Foundation — $7,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetTHE ARVD FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetBLUE RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $3,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC — $2,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC — $1,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HELPINGS INC — $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTRAL INDIANA POLICE FOUNDATION INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RAINBOW RAILROAD USA INC
  • Who funds REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES
  • Who funds NOURISHING HOPE
  • Who funds HEARTLAND ALLIANCE INTERNATIONAL INC
  • Who funds ONE MILLION DEGREES
  • Who funds ALPHA SIGMA PHI FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Kindness Foundation
  • Who funds THE ARVD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BLUE RIVER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC
  • Who funds KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds HISPANIC FEDERATION INC
  • Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC
  • Who funds SECOND HELPINGS INC
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE
  • Who funds THE CENTRAL INDIANA POLICE FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIN12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Faf Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph