· Private foundation
The F G K Foundation 009090-001
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $5k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $233k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION | $30,000 |
| SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION | $30,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION | $25,000 |
| NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC | $25,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC | $23,000 |
| RESCUE 1 FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA | $20,000 |
| JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS | $10,000 |
| ORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION | $10,000 |
| BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC | $10,000 |
| NEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC | $10,000 |
| CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA INC | $10,000 |
| ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +14% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
18 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IRInternational Rescue Committee INC6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +63%
- SFSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +19%
- ONORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +243%
Funded once
- SFSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To preserve, promote, and present the art of ballet and dance through performances, education, and community outreach, making high-quality cultural experiences accessible to diverse audiences.
Menlowe ballet performs works that impact audiences through clean, fresh, and innovative choreography ranging from cultural to contemporary works. it offers a professional performing opportunity to elite students from the award winning,…
Perform, promote and sustain classical ballet.
Oakland Ballet Company's mission is to inspire the community by keeping the tradition of ballet exciting, vibrant and accessible.
Ballet tucson is dedicated to bringing iconic, world-class dance performances and rising star artists to tucson and to sharing explorative experiences that inspire hope and excitement in our community.
Odc is dedicated to the lifecycle of the artistic process. odc aims to inspire audiences, cultiivate artists, engage community, and foster diversity and inclusion through dance.
SFP presents internationally acclaimed and emerging performing artists, introduces innovative programs, and builds new and diversified audiences for the arts through education and outreach activities.
Miami city ballet's mission is to produce and present the highest level of dance performances throughout florida, the united states and abroad; train young aspiring dancers; and develop miami city ballet school into a leader of dance…
San jose dance theatre was founded in l964 as a ballet academy and performing company by paul e. curtis, jr. and shawn stuart. it was created to provide excellence in ballet and dance training and high-quality performance opportunities for…
We promote gender equity in the dance industry, including but not limited to ballet companies, by providing a metrics-based analysis. through our research, programming, resources, and advocacy, ddp showcases and uplifts women throughout…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joyce Theater Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rescue 1 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA ↗
- Who funds DANCERS GROUP ↗
- Who funds JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds CONTRA COSTA BALLET FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RESCUE 1 FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOOTS2ROOTS ↗
- Who funds BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF ORINDA NATURE AREA ↗
- Who funds GARRETT MOULTON PRODUCTIONS ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO ↗
- Who funds AMY SEIWERT'S IMAGERY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC CO The Nature Conservancy New York ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The F G K Foundation 009090-001 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The F G K Foundation 009090-001?
Find your warmest path to The F G K Foundation 009090-001 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.