Skip to content
The F G K Foundation 009090-001 at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

The F G K Foundation 009090-001

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$238k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$255kInternational$120kCivil Rights$60kEducation$58kPublic Safety & Disaster$58kHealth$46kEnvironment$35kCrime & Legal$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $233k
$20,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$30,000
SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION$30,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$25,000
NATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC$25,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE INC$23,000
RESCUE 1 FOUNDATION$20,000
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA$20,000
JOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC$10,000
AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS$10,000
ORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION$10,000
BALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC$10,000
NEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC$10,000
CENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA INC$10,000
ADIRONDACK MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$656k · 18 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
1

Total granted

$656k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-3%

Still filing today

94%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalEnvironmentHuman ServicesCrime & LegalEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $95k · revenue +63%
  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $70k · revenue +19%
  • ON
    ORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $58k · revenue +243%

Funded once

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles International Dance Festival
—
2
Pacific Ballet Dance Theatre

To preserve, promote, and present the art of ballet and dance through performances, education, and community outreach, making high-quality cultural experiences accessible to diverse audiences.

Arts & Culture
3
Menlowe Ballet

Menlowe ballet performs works that impact audiences through clean, fresh, and innovative choreography ranging from cultural to contemporary works. it offers a professional performing opportunity to elite students from the award winning,…

Arts & Culture
4
New York City Ballet Inc

Perform, promote and sustain classical ballet.

Arts & Culture
5
Oakland Ballet Company

Oakland Ballet Company's mission is to inspire the community by keeping the tradition of ballet exciting, vibrant and accessible.

Arts & Culture
6
Ballet Arts Foundation

Ballet tucson is dedicated to bringing iconic, world-class dance performances and rising star artists to tucson and to sharing explorative experiences that inspire hope and excitement in our community.

Arts & Culture
7
Odc

Odc is dedicated to the lifecycle of the artistic process. odc aims to inspire audiences, cultiivate artists, engage community, and foster diversity and inclusion through dance.

Arts & Culture
8
San Francisco Performances Inc

SFP presents internationally acclaimed and emerging performing artists, introduces innovative programs, and builds new and diversified audiences for the arts through education and outreach activities.

Arts & Culture
9
Miami City Ballet Inc

Miami city ballet's mission is to produce and present the highest level of dance performances throughout florida, the united states and abroad; train young aspiring dancers; and develop miami city ballet school into a leader of dance…

Arts & Culture
10
San Jose Dance Theatre

San jose dance theatre was founded in l964 as a ballet academy and performing company by paul e. curtis, jr. and shawn stuart. it was created to provide excellence in ballet and dance training and high-quality performance opportunities for…

—
11
Ballet Folklorico De Barajas
Arts & Culture
12
Dance Data Project

We promote gender equity in the dance industry, including but not limited to ballet companies, by providing a metrics-based analysis. through our research, programming, resources, and advocacy, ddp showcases and uplifts women throughout…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Joyce Theater Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rescue 1 Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
15/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $70,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATIONNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INCDANCERS GROUP: $35,000 · Arts & CultureDANCERS GROUPJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INCBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INCGARRETT MOULTON PRODUCTIONS: $16,000 · Arts & CultureGARRETT MOULTON PRODUCTIONS+1 more: $5,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION: $60,000 · OtherAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNIONORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION: $58,000 · OtherORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATIONRESCUE 1 FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherRESCUE 1 FOUNDATIONCONTRA COSTA BALLET FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherCONTRA COSTA BALLET FOUNDATIONAMY SEIWERT'S IMAGERY: $11,000 · OtherBOOTS2ROOTS: $20,000 · OtherBOOTS2ROOTSFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $14,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLA…+2 more: $10,000 · OtherInternational Rescue Committee INC: $95,000 · InternationalInternational Rescu…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONT…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $41,000 · HealthAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $38,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $35,000 · Crime & LegalFRIENDS OF ORINDA NATURE AREA: $20,000 · EnvironmentNEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC CO The Nature Conservancy New York: $10,000 · Environment
Arts & Culture$224,000Other$213,000International$120,000Health$41,000Human Services$38,000Crime & Legal$35,000Environment$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $95,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION: $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION: $58,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC RADIO INC: $50,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $41,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetDANCERS GROUP: $35,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCENTRO LEGAL DE LA RAZA: $35,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJOYCE THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ORINDA NATURE AREA: $20,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetBOOTS2ROOTS: $20,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCONTRA COSTA BALLET FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 60% of budgetGARRETT MOULTON PRODUCTIONS: $16,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMY SEIWERT'S IMAGERY: $11,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetNEW YORK FUND FOR CONSERVATION INC CO The Nature Conservancy New York: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO OPERA ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The F G K Foundation 009090-001 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The F G K Foundation 009090-001. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The F G K Foundation 009090-001?

    Find your warmest path to The F G K Foundation 009090-001 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on F G K Foundation 009090-001’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home