Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ezrah Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19M
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$7.2M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$37MPhilanthropy$13MScience & Tech$5.0MEducation$4.0MFood & Nutrition$2.3MEmployment$1.8MHealth$661kHousing & Shelter$300kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k5 grants · $830k
  • $250k+13 grants · $18M
$500,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$498M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM$7,150,000
ONE ACRE FUND US$3,000,000
ONE ACRE FUND US$2,000,000
AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC$1,050,000
ROOT CAPITAL INC$1,000,000
FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR$750,000
THE RHODES TRUST$660,322
MYAGRO FARMS$500,000
PARTNERS IN FOOD SOLUTIONS$500,000
DIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION$500,000
THE RHODES TRUST$333,333
KEEP A CHILD ALIVE$300,000
ONE ACRE FUND US$290,234
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$212,744
FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY$180,980
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 87% of grant dollars ($59M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 13% that went abroad ($8.9M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 36% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CLIMATE ACTION FOR SMALLHOLDERS: $150k → 7%ROOT CAPITAL INC: $1.0M → 8%PARTNERS IN FOOD SOLUTIONS: $500k → 11%TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION: $172k → 7%THE RHODES TRUST HORIZON FUND: $114k → 8%DIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION: $500k → 10%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $352k → 14%FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR: $750k → 9%MYAGRO FARMS: $500k → 17%DALBERG CHARITABLE - SAFE HANDS KENYA: $1.0M → 14%PANORAMA GLOBAL: $150k → 9%ONE ACRE FUND US: $7.9M → 8%AMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSITY (ASSOC OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS): $2.0M → 6%ROOT CAPITAL INC: $1.3M → 8%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $280k → 14%FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC: $750k → 9%MYAGRO FARMS: $500k → 17%GENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC: $500k → 14%ONE ACRE FUND US: $6.7M → 8%ROOT CAPITAL INC: $1.0M → 8%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $253k → 14%FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC: $750k → 9%MYAGRO FARMS: $500k → 17%GLOBAL FINANCIAL INTEGRITY (GFI): $365k → 14%ONE ACRE FUND US: $3.3M → 8%ROOT CAPITAL INC: $1.0M → 8%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY: $213k → 14%FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC: $750k → 9%MYAGRO FARMS: $300k → 17%ONE ACRE FUND US: $3.0M → 8%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY KRISTOF C19 IMPACT INITIATIVE: $200k → 14%FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR: $500k → 9%AMERICANS FOR OXFORD: $263k → 17%ONE ACRE FUND: $2.2M → 8%FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY: $181k → 14%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $1.1M → 17%ONE ACRE FUND US: $2.0M → 8%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES: $950k → 17%ONE ACRE FUND US: $290k → 8%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES: $950k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES: $950k → 17%AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICES: $950k → 17%DIGITAL DIVIDE DATA: $654k → 17%DIGITAL DIVIDE DATA: $350k → 17%DIGITAL DIVIDE DATA: $250k → 17%KING BAUDOUIN FOUNDOUNDATION: $1.7M → 17%KEEP A CHILD ALIVE: $300k → 17%KEEP A CHILD ALIVE: $350k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
NC
DC

Beyond the US: 13% of all-years giving ($8.9M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
United Kingdom$8.9M · 8 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 44% of The Ezrah Charitable Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Ezrah Charitable Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 19% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$39M · 9 repeat orgs$16M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +61% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
19

Total granted

$39M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+61%
+22%

Still filing today

89%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.4M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalEducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OA
    ONE ACRE FUND
    5× · 2020–2024 · $25M · revenue +97%
  • RC
    ROOT CAPITAL INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $4.3M · revenue +3%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3.5M · revenue +197% · 90% of their budget

Funded once

  • RP
    RASPBERRY PI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2.0M
  • AT
    AMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSITY (ASSOC OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS)
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partnersglobal

Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

International
2
Ja Africa

The mission of ja africa is to inspire and prepare young people in africa to succeed in a global economy.

Education
3
Partners of the Americas Foundation

To advance the social economic well being of the americas.

International
4
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy
5
Development Gateway Inc

Development gateway (dg) creates tools and design processes that help collect, visualize, and use data for a more equitable world. for 20 years, we have built systems, dashboards, and tools to create more effective, open, and engaging…

International
6
Pan American Development Foundation

The pan american development foundation (padf) saves lives, promotes economic growth, and advances security and rule of law. through partnerships and innovation, we enable people across the americas to prosper with dignity and respect,…

International
7
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Open Government Partnership Secretariat

To secure concrete commitments from governments to their citizenry to promote transparency, empower citizens, fight corruption and harness new technologies to strengthen citizen centered governance.

International
10
Global Greengrants Fund

Global greengrants fund seeds grassroots environmental action and social justice through small grants. we support change from the ground up by channeling donations to local projects and grassroots campaigns for environmental justice around…

Environment
11
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
12
Partnership On Ai to Benefit People and Society

Bringing diverse voices together across global sectors, disciplines, and demographics so developments in ai advance positive outcomes for people and society.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Myriad Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is On His Path. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ONE ACRE FUND: $25,424,266 · InternationalONE ACRE FUNDAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $4,850,000 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INCROOT CAPITAL INC: $4,300,446 · InternationalROOT CAPITAL INC+4 more: $763,780 · InternationalRASPBERRY PI FOUNDATION: $5,000,000 · OtherRASPBERRY PI FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $2,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNIVERSITY (ASSOC OF AMERICAN RHODES SCHOLARS): $2,000,000 · OtherAMERICAN TRUST FOR OXFORD UNI…MYAGRO FARMS: $1,800,000 · OtherMYAGRO FARMSIndividual grant recipient: $1,718,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDigital Divide Data: $1,253,865 · OtherDigital Divide DataTHE RHODES TRUST: $1,107,555 · OtherTHE RHODES TRUSTDALBERG CHARITABLE - SAFE HANDS KENYA: $1,000,000 · OtherDALBERG CHARITABLE - SAFE HAN…+10 more: $1,738,995 · Other+10 moreVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $7,450,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE …FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC: $3,500,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF PARIVAAR …FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,277,988 · PhilanthropyFOCUSING PHILANTHROP…+2 more: $128,000 · PhilanthropyDIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $262,740 · EducationTEAM4TECH FOUNDATION: $171,924 · EducationSOUTH AFRICAN EDUCATION AND ENVIRONMENT PROJECT USA: $40,000 · EducationKEEP A CHILD ALIVE INC: $650,000 · HealthGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC: $500,000 · Youth DevelopmentVIA INTERNATIONAL: $45,000 · Arts & Culture
International$35,338,492Other$17,618,415Philanthropy$12,355,988Education$974,664Health$650,000Youth Development$500,000Arts & Culture$45,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetONE ACRE FUND: $25,424,266 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $7,450,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $4,850,000 over 5y, 2.5% of budgetROOT CAPITAL INC: $4,300,446 over 4y, 6.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC: $3,500,000 over 5y, 90% of budgetMYAGRO FARMS: $1,800,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetFOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC: $1,277,988 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetDigital Divide Data: $1,253,865 over 3y, 16% of budgetKEEP A CHILD ALIVE INC: $650,000 over 2y, 34% of budgetPARTNERS IN FOOD SOLUTIONS: $500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetDIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetGENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC: $500,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC: $262,740 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEAM4TECH FOUNDATION: $171,924 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetPANORAMA GLOBAL: $150,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $103,780 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $103,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVIA INTERNATIONAL: $45,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSOUTH AFRICAN EDUCATION AND ENVIRONMENT PROJECT USA: $40,000 over 1y, 39% of budgetON HIS PATH: $25,000 over 1y, 10% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ONE ACRE FUND ↗
  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PARIVAAR INC ↗
  • Who funds MYAGRO FARMS ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSING PHILANTHROPY INC ↗
  • Who funds Digital Divide Data ↗
  • Who funds KEEP A CHILD ALIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN FOOD SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds DIGITAL GREEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION YOU EMPLOYED INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICANS FOR OXFORD INC ↗
  • Who funds TEAM4TECH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PANORAMA GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds VIA INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH AFRICAN EDUCATION AND ENVIRONMENT PROJECT USA ↗
  • Who funds ON HIS PATH ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE ORPHANAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation)TX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Rippleworks Inc · The Patrick J McGovern Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ezrah Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ezrah Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ezrah Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Ezrah Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ezrah’s filings →

More from the funding graph