· Private foundation
The Evelyn W Bushwick Family Charitable Trust
Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of THE EVELYN W BUSHWICK FAMILY CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,000 |
| CHESAPEAKE BAY FDN | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| KEIRUV | $1,000 |
| JCF | $1,000 |
| COALITIONFORHOMELESS | $1,000 |
| BETHESDA CARES INC | $1,000 |
| MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY | $1,000 |
| LANCASTER LIBRARY | $1,000 |
| NOURISH NOW INC | $1,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,000 |
| SAMARITAN INNS | $1,000 |
| HOUSE OF RUTH | $750 |
| Individual grant recipient | $750 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +40% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2022, 20 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTRE OF YORK PENNSYLVANIA4× · 2017–2020 · $6k · revenue +38%
- SISAMARITAN INNS INC6× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +80%
- MCMONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC5× · 2018–2022 · $4k · revenue +64%
Funded once
- TDTHE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $9k · revenue +96%
- YCYork County Historical Societyone grant, 2017 · $2k
- UWUNITED WAY OF YORKone grant, 2021 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.
As the central community relations agency of the organized jewish community in our nation's capital, the jcrc of greater washington endeavors to foster a society based on freedom, justice and democratic pluralism for it is such a society…
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Create a more accessible, sustainable, prosperous and livable national capital region by being a discussion forum, expert resource, issue advocate, and catalyst for action.
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
Mjhs home care is a not-for-profit, certified home health agency (chha), committed to providing skilled nursing and rehabilitation services for individuals recuperating at home from an acute episode, often elderly and at-risk members of…
The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
The jewish council for the aging's (jca) mission is to provide programs and services to support older adults and their families and to build bridges across generations. jca serves people of all faiths, races, ethnicities, and income…
Operating under the name mjhs foundation, the mission of this philanthropic organization is to raise the funds necessary to support the charitable health care efforts of the organizations within the mjhs health system family. with roots…
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montgomery Housing Partnership Inc and the most unlike its peers is Keiruv Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YORK COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE DC CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTRE OF YORK PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN INNS INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF YORK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds NOURISH NOW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY ↗
- Who funds SIXTH & I SYNAGOGUE INC ↗
- Who funds KEEN GREATER DC LLC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR GROUP HOMES INC ↗
- Who funds GIVING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA CARES INC ↗
- Who funds KEIRUV INC ↗
- Who funds BENDER JCC OF GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds NAMI MONTGOMERTY COUNTY (MD) INC ↗
- Who funds HEBREW HOME OF GREATER WASHINGTON INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds Hero Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY MEDICINE EDUCATION CONSORTIUM ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · William S Abell Foundation Inc · United Way of the National Capital Area · The Gary and Pennie Abramson Charitable Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Robert I Schattner Foundation Inc aka Schattner Foundation · The Carl M Freeman Foundation Inc · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Central Pa · The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Evelyn W Bushwick Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bethesda Cares Inc — 100% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Manna Food Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bender Jcc of Greater Washington — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Social Service Agency — 1% of income from government
- Hebrew Home of Greater Washington Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.