Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eulich Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$1.0MHuman Services$129kPhilanthropy$108kHealth$37kArts & Culture$34kYouth Development$16kRecreation & Sports$12kEnvironment$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$6,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL$9,000
SWEETHEART BALL INC$6,500
LAKESIDE AQUATIC CLUB$2,000
DALLAS ALUMNAE CLUB OF PI BETA PHI$75
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOREFRONT LIVIING FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%FOREFRONT LIVIING FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

43%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$813k · 14 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
24

Total granted

$813k
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+4%

Still filing today

43%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHealthRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNITED WAY INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $100k · revenue +1%
  • TC
    THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL
    7× · 2019–2025 · $59k · revenue +11%
  • LA
    Lakeside Aquatic Club
    3× · 2023–2025 · $12k · revenue +36%

Funded once

  • US
    UT SOUTHWESTERN
    one grant, 2024 · $1.0M
  • MO
    Museum of Modern Art
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -18%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dallas Citizens Council

To lead and serve in the moments that matter the most for the people of dallas.

—
2
Downtown Dallas Inc

Downtown Dallas, Inc. (DDI), is the champion of a clean and safe Downtown and of the economic development and vibrancy of this community of diverse, unique neighborhoods. DDI: Mobilizes and amplifies the services of public agencies.…

—
3
Downtown Dallas Inc Foundation

Downtown Dallas, Inc. Foundation is the charitable arm of Downtown Dallas, Inc. whose purpose is to help make the area in and around Downtown Dallas a more vibrant and livable place for both daytime and permanent residents by promoting the…

Community Improvement
4
The Dallas Opera Foundation

Provide financial support to the dallas opera.

Philanthropy
5
Young Texans Against Cancer Dallas

Young Texans Against Cancer is a network of motivated young professionals collectively working together to raise awareness and funds to support the local Dallas cancer community. The Dallas chapter was established in 2007, as part of a…

—
6
The Shakespeare Festival of Dallas dba Shakespeare Dallas

Using Shakespeare's works as a cornerstone, Shakespeare Dallas serves the Southwest region with fun and accessible indoor and outdoor theatre, integrated school programs, and cultural enrichment for people of all ages and backgrounds.

—
7
Dallas United Crew Inc

Dallas United Crews mission is to unite and empower the Dallas community through rowing and dragon boating offering inclusive programs in competitive and recreational oar and paddle sports that serve people of all ages and abilities across…

Youth Development
8
Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council

The mission of the Dallas-Fort Worth Hospital Council is to drive evidence-based improvement in patient care and health equity throughout the region.

—
9
Dallas County Medical Society

The mission of the dallas county medical society is to promote public health and advocate for physicians and their relationship with patients, while upholding professionalism in the practice of medicine.

—
10
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
11
Dallas Wind Symphony

The Dallas Winds, a Grammy-nominated wind ensemble, stands as a cultural cornerstone of Dallas, Texas. Founded in 1985, the Dallas Winds has grown into one of the worlds premier wind bands, renowned for its extraordinary artistry and…

Arts & Culture
12
Teatro Hispano De Dallas

Teatro Dallas is committed to the cultural empowerment of the Latino community by representing our varied experiences, voices, and artistic expressions. Through high quality theatrical programming Teatro Dallas employs the power of theater…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Senior Citizens of Greater Dallas Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spectacular Follies. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UT SOUTHWESTERN: $1,000,000 · OtherUT SOUTHWESTERNIndividual grant recipient: $520,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE UNITED WAY INC: $100,000 · OtherTHE UNITED WAY INC+27 more: $165,270 · Other+27 moreTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $58,600 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyMuseum of Modern Art: $25,000 · Arts & CultureDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $6,875 · Arts & CultureSPECTACULAR FOLLIES: $1,500 · Arts & CultureLakeside Aquatic Club: $12,000 · Recreation & SportsFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesCAPITAL FOR KIDS: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHEF SHOWCASE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Health
Other$1,785,270Philanthropy$59,600Arts & Culture$33,375Recreation & Sports$12,000Human Services$6,000Youth Development$6,000Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE UNITED WAY INC: $100,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL: $58,600 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLakeside Aquatic Club: $12,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION: $6,875 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITAL FOR KIDS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetDALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $2,445 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHEF SHOWCASE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEXAS DISCOVERY GARDENS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSPECTACULAR FOLLIES: $1,500 over 3y, 6.4% of budgetEQUEST: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVolunteerNow: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CRYSTAL CHARITY BALL ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds Lakeside Aquatic Club ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FOREFRONT LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL FOR KIDS ↗
  • Who funds DALLAS 24 HOUR CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR CITIZENS OF GREATER DALLAS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHEF SHOWCASE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TEXAS DISCOVERY GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds SPECTACULAR FOLLIES ↗
  • Who funds EQUEST ↗
  • Who funds VolunteerNow ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Dallas FoundationTX21.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Dallas Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Texas Instruments Foundation · Jm Haggar Jr Family Foundation · Lisa and Clay Cooley Family Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eulich Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eulich Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Eulich Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Eulich Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eulich Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph