Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Eugene and Lai Wong Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$149k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$111kReligion$64kPhilanthropy$28kHuman Services$19kCivil Rights$16kYouth Development$14kScience & Tech$10kPublic Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO$102,486
RENO PHILHARMONIC$10,000
E2 VEGAS$9,500
NEW HORIZONS$5,000
EPIC CHURCH$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
CALVARY CHAPEL GREEN VALLEY$5,000
CATALINA HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION$2,000
MT ROSE SKI FOUNDATION$1,000
TUNNEL 2 TOWERS$1,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$1,000
THE HAYEK GROUP$1,000
LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$500
LAYMAN'S FOUNDATION$500
POP'S FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $18k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%POP'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%POP'S FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%POP'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%POP'S FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%HOPE FOR PRISONERS: $5k → 13%POP'S FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%HOPE FOR PRISONERS: $3k → 13%POP'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%POP'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%POP'S FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%THE GENERATOR INC: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$375k · 16 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
22

Total granted

$375k
$56k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+18%

Still filing today

38%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationReligionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • A
    ARTOWN
    2× · 2022–2023 · $8k · revenue +6%
  • HF
    HOPE FOR PRISONERS INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $8k · revenue +291%
  • PF
    POPS FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +18%
  • GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue +7%
  • TG
    The Generator Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +54%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Henry George School of Social Science

Our mission is (1) informing the public and policymakers about the analytical framework and policy reforms proposed by the pioneering late-19th century u.s. economist henry george; and (2) explaining how his ground-breaking formula for…

Education
2
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
3
The Institute On Religion and Public Life Inc

The institute on religion and public life is an interreligious, nonpartisan research and educational 501(c)(3) organization. the institute's mission is to articulate a governing consensus that supports: (see schedule o)- a religiously…

—
4
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
5
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
6
The Waymaker
Religion
7
Dickinson College

Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship

Education
8
Honolulu Museum of Art

To create relevant and transformative experiences through the study, preservation, presentation and creation of art.

Arts & Culture
9
San Francisco Opera Association

We believe opera is a uniquely compelling, entertaining and emotionally thrilling art form. our mission is to bring together growing audiences to experience opera's transformative power.

Arts & Culture
10
Greenlight Giving Foundation
Public Benefit
11
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
12
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation

Committed to innovation, the solomon r. guggenheim foundation (the "foundation") collects, (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Truckee Meadows Community College Foundation; the most unlike its peers is That Day. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO: $196,566 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENOEZ FOUNDATION: $27,500 · OtherEZ FOUNDATIONCALVARY CHAPEL GREEN VALLEY: $20,375 · OtherCALVARY CHAPEL GREEN VALLEYEDAWN: $15,500 · OtherLAYMAN'S FOUNDATION: $13,100 · OtherEPIC CHURCH: $13,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $12,750 · Other+24 more: $61,990 · Other+24 moreE2 VEGAS: $22,129 · ReligionE2 VEGASTHAT DAY: $12,279 · ReligionTHAT DAYSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN…HOPE FOR PRISONERS INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,080 · Human ServicesPOPS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesThe Generator Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureARTOWN: $8,100 · Arts & CultureUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,750 · EducationTRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,567 · EducationHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,276 · EducationHAYEK GROUP: $1,000 · Education
Other$360,781Religion$39,408Human Services$22,580Arts & Culture$18,100Education$16,093

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetE2 VEGAS: $22,129 over 3y, 24% of budgetTHAT DAY: $12,279 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetARTOWN: $8,100 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE FOR PRISONERS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $5,080 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOPS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetThe Generator Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $2,567 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,276 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHAYEK GROUP: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds E2 VEGAS ↗
  • Who funds THAT DAY ↗
  • Who funds RENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTOWN ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE FOR PRISONERS INC ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds POPS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Generator Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUCKEE MEADOWS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds HAYEK GROUP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Eugene and Lai Wong Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Eugene and Lai Wong Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Eugene and Lai Wong Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Eugene and Lai Wong Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eugene and Lai Wong’s filings →

    More from the funding graph