Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Elma Music Foundation (Us)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.9M
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$223k
Largest
01What you fund
0179% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$7.6MPhilanthropy$4.3MYouth Development$2.8MHuman Services$1.8MEducation$1.4MHealth$400kCrime & Legal$233kOther$4.9M
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k21 grants · $1.9M
$50,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC$223,212
THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC$200,000
ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC$200,000
MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC$176,552
THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES$100,000
BIG THOUGHT$100,000
JAZZ FOUNDATION OF AMERICA INC$100,000
A PLACE CALLED HOME$91,666
MAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC$75,000
RYSE INC$75,000
YOUTH ON RECORD$50,000
THE MUSIC EDUCATION GROUP INC$50,000
SOULSVILLE FOUNDATION INC$50,000
BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC$50,000
THE ROAD RECOVERY FOUNDATION$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $1.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC: $50k → 14%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $283k → 23%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $200k → 23%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $200k → 23%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC: $200k → 23%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC: $75k → 23%THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $220k → 17%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC: $75k → 23%NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC: $220k → 17%ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC: $75k → 23%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $250k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
MA
CA
UT
CO
MD
TN
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 16% of The Elma Music Foundation (Us)’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 46% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 41% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Elma Music Foundation (Us)lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 34 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against -30% for the ones you funded once.

34 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
3

Total granted

$20M
$850k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
-30%

Still filing today

85%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC
    6× · 2019–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +31%
  • JF
    Jazz Foundation of America Inc
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +356%
  • EM
    ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • MF
    MUSICARES FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -11%
  • HC
    HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $250k · revenue -31%
  • UA
    Urban Arts Partnership
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Young Musicians Unite Inc

Young musicians unite believes that every student in miami-dade county deserves access to music education regardless of their socio-economic background. we collaborate with schools to provide free music education which has been proven to…

Arts & Culture
2
Move(Nyc) Foundation Inc

Move|nyc| is a civic arts and social justice organization committed to cultivating a more diverse and inclusive society through transforming the field of professional dance. more than an arts organization, move|nyc| is a movement for…

Public Benefit
3
David's Harp Foundation

To inspire, educate, and empower "opportunity youth", to achieve academic success through music education, sound engineering, and multimedia production.

Youth Development
4
Miami Music Project Inc

Miami music project uses music as an instrument for social transformation, empowering children to acquire values and achieve their full potential, positively affecting their society through the study and performance of music. our vision is…

Arts & Culture
5
Bloomingdale School of Music

To provide access to high-quality music education for anyone who seeks it, regardless of economic status, ability level, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religious affiliation.

Arts & Culture
6
Black Music Entrepreneurship Incubator

Musical Education and Training

7
The Wharton Institute for the Performing Arts Inc

To offer accessible, high-quality performing arts education that sparks personal growth and builds inclusive communities. its vision is to transform performing arts education in an inclusive community accessible to all.

8
New World Symphony Inc

Prepares gifted graduates of prestigious music programs for successful careers in orchestras and ensembles.

Education
9
Girls Write Nashville

Girls write nashville empowers expression through songwriting, production, mentorship and creative community for teen artists. we are an artist and educator-led 501(c)(3) creative youth development program in nashville, tn allied with…

Arts & Culture
10
Lyrica Baroque

The mission of lyrica baroque is to support a diverse community of students, teachers, artists, institutions and audiences of all ages through education, collaboration and performance. lyrica baroque seeks to promote the extraordinary…

Arts & Culture
11
San Francisco Jazz Organization

The san francisco jazz organization (the organization) is a recognized international leader in jazz creation, presentation, and education. the organization explores the full spectrum of jazz, from the music's origins in the african…

Arts & Culture
12
Education Through Music Inc

Education through music (etm) was formed to promote the use of music in the core curricula of under-resourced schools as a means of positively impacting student motivation, achievement, and self-confidence by providing year-long, in-school…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mind Builders Creative Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Youth Empowerment Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community FoundationsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community Arts CentersYouth Development ServicesUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%47%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%49%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%27%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/40
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,525

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/40
Grantees still filing
26/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $2,176,580 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSICMEMPHIS EQUITY THROUGH ARTS INC — $917,070 · Arts & CultureMEMPHIS EQUITY THROUGH ARTS INCBIG THOUGHT — $600,000 · Arts & CultureBIG THOUGHTSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION — $575,000 · Arts & CultureSOULSVILLE FOUNDATIONMIND BUILDERS CREATIVE ARTS INC — $550,000 · Arts & CultureMIND BUILDERS CREATIVE ARTS INCMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · Arts & CultureMUSICARES FOUNDATION INCRECESS ACTIVITIES INC — $475,000 · Arts & CultureRECESS ACTIVITIES INCMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $455,000 · Arts & CultureMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INCYOUTH ON RECORD — $400,000 · Arts & CultureEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts — $375,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $300,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $275,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC — $900,000 · OtherTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF …SAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION — $675,000 · OtherSAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATI…A PLACE CALLED HOME — $650,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOMEAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS — $550,000 · OtherAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARSVH1 SAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION - NEW ORLEANS — $525,000 · OtherVH1 SAVE THE MUSIC FOUN…MUSIC EDUCATION COALITION INC GRAMMY MUSIC EDUCATION COALITION — $475,000 · OtherMUSIC EDUCATION COALITI…YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC — $391,667 · OtherYOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJE…LIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION INC — $375,000 · OtherLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUND…VH1 SAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION - NEWARK — $225,000 · Other+1 more — $100,000 · OtherTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $1,600,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION…Jazz Foundation of America Inc — $1,500,000 · PhilanthropyJazz Foundation of A…BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $986,632 · PhilanthropyBROOKLYN COMMUNITY F…United Way of Greater Houston — $250,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of Greate…RYSE INC — $725,000 · Youth DevelopmentRYSE INCSPY HOP PRODUCTIONS — $725,000 · Youth DevelopmentSPY HOP PRODU…Renaissance Youth Center — $675,000 · Youth DevelopmentRenaissance Y…Neutral Zone — $375,000 · Youth DevelopmentNeutral ZoneGUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC — $300,000 · Youth DevelopmentGUITARS OVER …ELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC — $1,108,000 · Human ServicesNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $440,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $250,000 · Human Services+1 more — $50,000 · Human ServicesBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC — $976,991 · EducationLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $300,000 · EducationTHE MOTIVATIONAL EDGE INC — $150,000 · EducationRoad Recovery Foundation Inc — $400,000 · HealthYOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT — $233,333 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$7,598,650Other$4,866,667Philanthropy$4,336,632Youth Development$2,800,000Human Services$1,848,000Education$1,426,991Health$400,000Crime & Legal$233,333

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMANHATTAN SCHOOL OF MUSIC — $2,176,580 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $1,600,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetJazz Foundation of America Inc — $1,500,000 over 7y, 16% of budgetELLIS MARSALIS CENTER FOR MUSIC INC — $1,108,000 over 7y, 14% of budgetBROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $986,632 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC — $976,991 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEMPHIS EQUITY THROUGH ARTS INC — $917,070 over 7y, 13% of budgetTHE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC — $900,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetRYSE INC — $725,000 over 7y, 2.5% of budgetSPY HOP PRODUCTIONS — $725,000 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetRenaissance Youth Center — $675,000 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetSAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATION — $675,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $650,000 over 6y, 1.8% of budgetBIG THOUGHT — $600,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetSOULSVILLE FOUNDATION — $575,000 over 6y, 6.3% of budgetAFTER-SCHOOL ALL-STARS — $550,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetMIND BUILDERS CREATIVE ARTS INC — $550,000 over 7y, 3.4% of budgetMUSICARES FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetRECESS ACTIVITIES INC — $475,000 over 6y, 15% of budgetMAMA FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS INC — $455,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetNEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC — $440,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetYOUTH ON RECORD — $400,000 over 5y, 7.0% of budgetRoad Recovery Foundation Inc — $400,000 over 5y, 12% of budgetNeutral Zone — $375,000 over 5y, 13% of budgetEast Bay Center for the Performing Arts — $375,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetLIVING CLASSROOMS FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetGUITARS OVER GUNS ORGANIZATION INC — $300,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $300,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston — $250,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $250,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROJECT — $233,333 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetTHE MOTIVATIONAL EDGE INC — $150,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetSTEM FROM DANCE INC — $150,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetUrban Arts Partnership — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetATLANTA MUSIC PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMOVING IN THE SPIRIT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lewis Prize Foundation IncNY28.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lewis Prize Foundation Inc · Universal Music All Together Now Foundation Inc · National Basketball Association Foundation · The Hearst Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · D'Addario Foundation Inc · Altman Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Kresge Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Ford Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Elma Music Foundation (Us) funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Living Classrooms Foundation7% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc1% of income from government
  • Guitars Over Guns Organization Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Elma Music Foundation (Us)?

Find your warmest path to The Elma Music Foundation (Us) through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph