Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Elizabeth Dole Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$30k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$391kEducation$100kHuman Services$80kHealth$50kPublic Benefit$30kFood & Nutrition$20kAnimals$15kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $493
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION$20,000
ST JUDE$10,000
SALVATION ARMY$493
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MAYO CLINIC: $25k → 9%RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION & INSTITUTE: $10k → 10%MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING: $10k → 17%Caring for Military Families: $25k → 14%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 13%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $45k → 13%K U ENDOWMENT CHARITABLE GIFT FUND DOLE INSTITUTE: $100k → 15%WINGS OF HOPE INC: $5k → 11%ST JUDE: $10k → 17%BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $35k → 15%SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW: $10k → 8%THE SALVATION ARMY: $20k → 9%EASTER SEALS: $10k → 8%MAYO CLINIC: $15k → 9%ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%CAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRIST INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 13%DOLE INSTITUTE OF POLITICS: $20k → 15%BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $20k → 15%THE SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 9%ENDOWMENT OF THE UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $5k → 14%BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $20k → 10%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 15%SALVATION ARMY: $493 → 9%CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES ELIZABETH DOLE FDTN: $5k → 14%FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $1k → 15%NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $50k → 14%ROWAN MUSEUM INCORPORATED: $1k → 15%THE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $40k → 14%THE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $30k → 14%THE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $25k → 14%THE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $20k → 14%SO OTHERS MIGHT EAT: $10k → 14%HUMANE RESCUE ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
CA
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$496k · 7 repeat orgs$201k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +221% since the first grant, against -21% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
12

Total granted

$496k
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+221%
-21%

Still filing today

14%
58%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPublic BenefitAnimalsFood & NutritionEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TN
    THE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $165k
  • FU
    FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    5× · 2018–2023 · $111k
  • BG
    BILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $85k

Funded once

  • KU
    K U ENDOWMENT CHARITABLE GIFT FUND DOLE INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • DI
    DOLE INSTITUTE OF POLITICS
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • ES
    EASTER SEALS
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft

The quincy institute promotes ideas that move u.s. foreign policy away from endless war and toward vigorous diplomacy in the pursuit of international peace. qi's staff and non-resident experts expose the costs and consequences of…

Community Improvement
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Hudson Institute Inc

Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future.

—
4
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
5
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
6
Uso Foundation

The mission of the uso foundation (foundation) is to support uso inc.'s (uso) mission to strengthen the well-being of the people serving in america's military and their families.

—
7
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
8
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
Cato Institute

The mission of the cato institute is to keep the principles, ideas, and moral case for liberty alive for future generations, while moving public policy in the direction of individual liberty, limited government, free markets, and peace.

Public Benefit
11
Defense Priorities Initiative

To inform citizens, thought leaders, and policy makers of the importance of a strong, dynamic military - used more judiciously to protect America's narrowly defined national interests - and promote a realistic grand strategy prioritizing…

Civil Rights
12
Center for a New American Security Inc

The mission of the Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is to develop strong, pragmatic and principled national security and defense policies building on the the expertise and experience of its staff and advisors. CNAS engages policy…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Endowment of the Us Institute of Peace; the most unlike its peers is The Ronald Reagan Presidential Foundation and Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INC: $165,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH INCFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $111,000 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCHK U ENDOWMENT CHARITABLE GIFT FUND DOLE INSTITUTE: $100,000 · OtherK U ENDOWMENT CHARITABLE GIFT FUND DOLE INSTITUTEBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $85,000 · OtherBILLY GRAHAM EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATIONMAYO CLINIC: $40,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICTHE SALVATION ARMY: $30,493 · Other+7 more: $85,000 · Other+7 moreCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · Public BenefitTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $10,000 · EducationWINGS OF HOPE: $5,000 · InternationalENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $5,000 · InternationalWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 · AnimalsROWAN MUSEUM INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$616,493Public Benefit$45,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Education$10,000International$10,000Animals$5,000Arts & Culture$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetTHE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOME INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINGS OF HOPE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROWAN MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARING FOR MILITARY FAMILIES THE ELIZABETH DOLE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SOCIETY OF ST ANDREW INC ↗
  • Who funds SOME INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds WINGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ENDOWMENT OF THE US INSTITUTE OF PEACE ↗
  • Who funds ROWAN MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Elizabeth Dole Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Elizabeth Dole Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Elizabeth Dole Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Elizabeth Dole Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elizabeth Dole’s filings →

    More from the funding graph