Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Elias Genevieve and Georgianna Atol Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$3.5MEducation$2.3MInternational$300kHuman Services$189kReligion$165kFood & Nutrition$155kArts & Culture$55kEmployment$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $260k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $500k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CEDARS SINAI$300,000
CITY OF HOPE$200,000
LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY$150,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES$100,000
CHABAD'S TERROR VICTIMS PROJECT$50,000
IMMACULATE HEART OF MARY SCHOOL$30,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE LA$25,000
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION FOR PANCREATIC CANCER RESEARCH$25,000
PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION$25,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$25,000
COLEL CHABAD$20,000
INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS AND JEWS$20,000
MOVE AMERICA FORWARD$20,000
THE WESTSIDE KOLLELL INC$15,000
BIKUR CHOLIM HEALTH CARE FUND$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $219k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $10k → 6%ST ANNE'S: $25k → 14%ST ANNE'S: $25k → 14%ST ANNE'S: $25k → 14%LOVE & GROCERIES: $10k → 14%LOVE & GROCERIES: $10k → 14%LOVE & GROCERIES: $10k → 14%LOVE & GROCERIES: $10k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL AT DOLORES MISSION: $25k → 14%ERIKA WHITMORE GODWIN FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%ERIKA WHITMORE GODWIN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ERIKA WHITMORE GODWIN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ERIKA WHITMORE GODWIN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%ERIKA WHITMORE GODWIN FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.3M · 36 repeat orgs$360k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
14

Total granted

$6.3M
$250k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+31%

Still filing today

58%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEducationInternationalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.3M · revenue +55%
  • LM
    LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +47%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2018–2024 · $700k · revenue +102%

Funded once

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY - STERN COLLEGE FOR WOMEN
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • PP
    Proyecto Pastoralgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
2
Hadassah the Women's Zionist Org of America Inc

Hadassah, the women's zionist organization of america, inc., a new york not-for-profit corporation ("hwzoa") enhances the health and lives of people in israel, the united states and worldwide through education, advocacy, women's…

Community Improvement
3
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
4
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

—
7
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
8
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
9
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
10
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
11
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Bar-Ilan University; the most unlike its peers is Love N Groceries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $895,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPEIMMACULATE HEART OF MARY SCHOOL: $150,000 · OtherIMMACULATE HEART OF MARY SCHOOLCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $120,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $120,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $95,000 · OtherREMOTE AREA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $80,000 · Other+25 more: $815,000 · Other+25 moreLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $1,200,000 · EducationLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITYAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $700,000 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIV…+2 more: $80,000 · EducationCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,275,000 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTERChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $340,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angele…BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INCTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $60,000 · Health+2 more: $15,000 · HealthSt Anne's Family Services: $75,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $70,000 · Human ServicesLOVE N GROCERIES: $40,000 · Human ServicesProyecto Pastoral: $25,000 · Human ServicesThe Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation: $9,000 · Human ServicesPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $195,000 · PhilanthropyTROOPATHON: $110,000 · InternationalChabad Terror Victims Project Inc: $50,000 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,000 · InternationalThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $30,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $10,000 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHEMOCESSORIES: $5,000 · Arts & CultureFeeding America: $20,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$2,275,000Education$1,980,000Health$1,790,000Human Services$219,000Philanthropy$195,000International$180,000Arts & Culture$55,000Food & Nutrition$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $1,275,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY: $1,200,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY: $700,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $340,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $195,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTROOPATHON: $110,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $100,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK: $95,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSEPULVEDA RESEARCH CORPORATION: $75,000 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetSt Anne's Family Services: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $55,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOVE N GROCERIES: $40,000 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $30,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetProyecto Pastoral: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMARSHALL B KETCHUM UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESH TIKVA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetThe Erika Whitmore Godwin Foundation: $9,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetBarlow Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBiblical Archaeology Society: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC ↗
  • Who funds TROOPATHON ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SEPULVEDA RESEARCH CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds St Anne's Family Services ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Terror Victims Project Inc ↗
  • Who funds LOVE N GROCERIES ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds Proyecto Pastoral ↗
  • Who funds MARSHALL B KETCHUM UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE SOLDIERS PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Los AngelesCA12.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · California Community Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Elias Genevieve and Georgianna Atol Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Elias Genevieve and Georgianna Atol Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Elias Genevieve and Georgianna Atol’s filings →

    More from the funding graph