Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Eganwood Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$90k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$188kPhilanthropy$115kAnimals$88kHealth$85kHuman Services$71kEnvironment$44kRecreation & Sports$37kYouth Development$22kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $72k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$755k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE$25,000
TROUT UNLIMITED$15,000
BIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$11,250
STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC$11,000
THE PARK SCHOOL$10,000
LONE PEAK VETERINARY HOSPITAL$5,250
ONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
TETON RAPTOR CENTER$4,000
JACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB$2,500
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $67k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KINDNESS4KATE: $1k → 12%CLIMB WYOMING: $1k → 10%TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $3k → 23%KIEVE-WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $2k → 9%TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION: $1k → 23%KIEVE WAVUS EDUCATION INC: $1k → 9%ONE22 INC: $20k → 5%ONE22 INC: $18k → 5%ONE22 RESOURCE CENTER: $18k → 5%ONE22 INC: $2k → 5%ONE22 INC: $1k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
MT
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
WV
VA
TN
DC
HI
LA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$484k · 29 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
23

Total granted

$484k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+21%

Still filing today

79%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PS
    PARK SCHOOL CORPORATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $71k · revenue +48%
  • STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $52k · revenue +118%
  • TI
    THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS
    3× · 2017–2022 · $30k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • BC
    BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS
    one grant, 2023 · $12k
  • TU
    TROUT UNLIMITED
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • WS
    WESTMINSTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Creekside Charter Management

To cultivate student success through mindful perseverance, critical thinking, resourcefulness and advanced knowledge that will prepare students for high levels of success in school, work, and life, while honoring the individuality and…

Education
2
Vermont Wilderness School

Provide nature-based education and mentoring to youth and adults in southern vermont and western massachusetts.

Environment
3
Aspen Center for Environmental Studies

Aces' mission is to inspire a life-long commitment to the earth by providing innovative and immersive programming for all ages.

Environment
4
Sierra Watch

Sierra watch secures conservation outcomes to protect the natural resources, mountain communities, and timeless values of the tahoe sierra.

Environment
5
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
6
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
American Hiking Society

To empower all to enjoy, share, and preserve the hiking experience.

—
9
Sierra Nevada Journeys

Our mission is to deliver innovative outdoor science based education programs for youth to develop critical thinking skills and to inspire natural resource stewardship.

Youth Development
10
Southern Sierra Research Station

The southern sierra research station (ssrs) is a non-profit organization that aims to understand the biological processes that control population sizes and species diversity. the southern sierra research station (ssrs) is located in…

Environment
11
Jackson Hole Community School

JHCS prepares students to succeed in college and life through challenging academics and excellence in teaching, in a community founded on personal relationships, student initiative, and integrity.

Education
12
Conservation X Labs Inc

To improve the efficacy, speed, cost, sustainability, and scaling of conservation solutions through harnessing exponential technology, innovation, and entrepreneurship to prevent human-induced extinction.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Jackson Hole and the most unlike its peers is Trout Unlimited Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEnvironmental Conservation …Youth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterFood Banks and PantriesCommunity FoundationsAddiction Recovery Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%52%20–35yr13%16%35–55yr16%22%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/42
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,523

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/40
Grantees still filing
33/40
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PARK SCHOOL CORPORATION — $71,000 · EducationPARK SCHOOL CORPORATIONSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC — $52,000 · EducationSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION IN…TRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $27,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCH…BIG SKY DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC dba BIG SKY DISCOVERY ACADEMY — $8,000 · Education+4 more — $5,000 · EducationTETON RAPTOR CENTER — $30,500 · OtherTETON RAPTOR CENTERLONE PEAK VETERINARY HOSPITAL — $22,250 · OtherLONE PEAK VETERINARY HOSPITALBRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS THE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE — $20,500 · OtherBRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS THE INST…BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS — $12,000 · OtherBRAIN CHEMISTRY LABSTROUT UNLIMITED — $10,000 · OtherTROUT UNLIMITEDWESTMINSTER SCHOOL — $10,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER SCHOOLKIDDO — $9,000 · OtherAPPLE ORCHARD SCHOOL — $6,500 · OtherCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · OtherCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION I…ULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · OtherJACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB — $6,500 · Other+12 more — $27,000 · Other+12 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $110,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATIO…ONE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyOne22 Inc — $58,000 · Human ServicesOne22 IncTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION — $8,000 · Human ServicesTEAM GLEASON…Kieve Wavus Education Inc — $3,000 · Human Services+2 more — $2,000 · Human ServicesTHE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS — $29,500 · HealthTHE INSTI…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,000 · HealthST JUDE C…CELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthCELIAC DI…THE STATION FOUNDATION — $6,000 · HealthTHE STATI…I AM ALS — $2,000 · HealthZACHS BRIDGE INC — $2,000 · HealthPediatric Hydrocephalus Foundation Inc — $2,000 · Health+1 more — $1,500 · HealthHEART OF THE VALLEY INC — $25,500 · AnimalsHEART OF …TROUT UNLIMITED INC — $20,000 · AnimalsTROUT UNL…PINTLER PETS — $3,500 · AnimalsPINTLER P…WILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC — $2,000 · Animals+2 more — $2,500 · AnimalsBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $27,250 · EnvironmentCollier County Audubon Society Inc Audubon Western Everglades — $5,000 · Environment
Education$163,000Other$175,250Philanthropy$115,000Human Services$71,000Health$56,000Animals$53,500Environment$32,250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE — $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPARK SCHOOL CORPORATION — $71,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetOne22 Inc — $58,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC — $52,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTETON RAPTOR CENTER — $30,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE INSTITUTE FOR ETHNOMEDICINE INC DBA BRAIN CHEMISTRY LABS — $29,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBIG SKY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $27,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTRUSTEES OF WESTMINSTER SCHOOL INC — $27,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHEART OF THE VALLEY INC — $25,500 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTROUT UNLIMITED INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBIG SKY DISCOVERY SCHOOL INC dba BIG SKY DISCOVERY ACADEMY — $8,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJACKSON HOLE SKI & SNOWBOARD CLUB — $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetULTIMATE HAWAIIAN TRAIL RUN FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCELIAC DISEASE FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE STATION FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCollier County Audubon Society Inc Audubon Western Everglades — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetECOTRUST — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPINTLER PETS — $3,500 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetKieve Wavus Education Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetI AM ALS — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJACKSON HOLE YOUTH SOCCER — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BERKSHIRE SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZACHS BRIDGE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetPediatric Hydrocephalus Foundation Inc — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF VENICE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAnimal Adoption Center Inc — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCRC RECOVERY FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNOBLE AND GREENOUGH SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FESSENDEN SCHOOL — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHole Food Rescue — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINDNESS4KATE — $1,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMARIN HORIZON SCHOOL INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG SKY SKI EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEVADA HUMANE SOCIETY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRAIGHEAD BERINGIA SOUTH — $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Wood Family Foundatio…Yellowstone Club Comm…First Interstate Banc…The Brooks FoundationNational Philanthropi…Spanish Peaks Communi…William E Weiss Found…Moonlight Community F…One Valley Community …Silicon Valley Commun…Gs Donor Advised Phil…
Community Foundation of Jackson HoleWY21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Wood Family Foundation Trust William · Yellowstone Club Community Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Brooks Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Spanish Peaks Community Foundation · William E Weiss Foundation Inc · Moonlight Community Foundation · One Valley Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Eganwood Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Ecotrust — 14% of income from government
  • Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
  • The Fessenden School — 0% of income from government
  • Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home