Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edward L Croman Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$597k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Religion$465kCivil Rights$164kInternational$26kHuman Services$13kEducation$5kPhilanthropy$5kArts & Culture$1kHealth$200Other$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $69k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $158k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $370k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF CAMDEN COUNTY$89,000
CHABAD CENTER OF GREATER DAYTON$77,000
CHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LEARING & LIVING$77,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA$64,000
END ANTI-SEMITISM$63,000
OHR YAAKOV OF AMERICA$28,000
Individual grant recipient$23,001
CONGREGATION YESODE HATORAH$23,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
CHABAD OF WEST ORANGE$18,744
CHABAD OF MONTCLAIR$13,000
CHABAD CENTER OF GREATER SOMERSET$12,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$9,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

9%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$60k · 5 repeat orgs$628k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
9

Total granted

$60k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-11%
0%

Still filing today

20%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $577k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
InternationalEducationReligionHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k · revenue -11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2024–2025 · $15k
  • CO
    CONGREGATION OHR TORAH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue -20%
  • HO
    HATZOLAH OF WEST ORANGE & LIVINGSTON
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • TI
    TZOHAR ISRAEL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Tzeirei Chabad in Israel Inc

To pursue a greater outreach of knowledge of the Jewish Torah and to further educate the less knowledgeable

Religion
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
Asif Inc

ASIF helps its donees by providing information and performing due diligence on charitable organizations in Israel on the donees' behalf.

—
4
American Friends of Netivot Inc

American Friends of Netivot, Inc. is a charitable organization raising funds to create educational and social activities in the small border town of Netiviot near the Negev Desert in Israel.

Religion
5
Friends of Givat Haviva

Friends of Givat Haviva, Inc. is a New York not-for-profit fundraising organization devoted to the advancement of Jewish-Arab reconciliation, cultural and religious pluralism, democratic values, and peace in the Middle East.

International
6
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
7
American Friends of Israel Organizations Inc

Funding of organizations qualified under section 501(c) or equivalent as operating for charitable, religious, or educational purposes, or that would so qualify based on the nature of such organization's operations

International
8
American Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc

To award scholarships and grants to students from the United States attending Yeshivas Gedolah Matisyahu in the State of Israel

Education
9
American Friends of Yeshiva Ner Aharon

The organization's primary activity is that of raising funds primarily for distribution to israeli institutions of higher learning. the funds may be distributed to other institutions organized exclusively for religious, charitable and…

Religion
10
Friends of Jerusalem

Friends of Jerusalem's mission is to provide assistance to the needs and indigent living in Jerusalem and all of Israel.

Human Services
11
American Friends of Yisa Bracha Inc

To raise funds for Yisa Bracha a registered Israeli non-profit and realted organizations.

Human Services
12
American Friends of Tiferet David- Ostrova Inc

American friends of Tiferet David-Ostrova Biale's purpose is to support the charitable and communal efforts of the Ostrova Biala Rebbed Avidshlit'a in Israel and in the United States.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tzohar Israel Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Friendship Circle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF CAMDEN COUNTY N J: $89,000 · OtherCHABAD LUBAVITCH OF CAMDEN COUNTY N JCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LEARING & LIVING: $77,000 · OtherCHABAD CENTER FOR JEWISH LEARING & LIVINGCHABAD CENTER OF GREATER DAYTON: $77,000 · OtherCHABAD CENTER OF GREATER DAYTONEND ANTISEMITISM: $63,000 · OtherEND ANTISEMITISMOHR YAAKOV OF AMERICA: $28,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $23,001 · OtherCONGREGATION YESODE HATORAH: $23,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+29 more: $162,495 · Other+29 moreAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $64,000 · EducationAMERICAN FR…GLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE: $5,000 · EducationGLOBAL ISRA…Central Fund of Israel: $15,000 · InternationalNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $7,500 · InternationalTeach for Israel Inc: $2,500 · InternationalKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $1,012 · InternationalFRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC: $10,000 · ReligionTZOHAR ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 · ReligionTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesAMERICA GIVES INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropySHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $200 · Food & NutritionHARVARD MAGAZINE INC: $35 · Arts & Culture
Other$562,496Education$69,000International$26,012Religion$15,000Human Services$10,000Philanthropy$5,000Food & Nutrition$200Arts & Culture$35

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTZOHAR ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLEL CHIBAS JERUSALEM: $1,012 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVARD MAGAZINE INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF HEBRON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds TZOHAR ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL ISRAEL ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds Teach for Israel Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY22.6× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Edward L Croman Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · Fjc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edward L Croman Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edward L Croman Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Edward L Croman Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Edward L Croman Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edward L Croman’s filings →

    More from the funding graph