Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Edmund A & Marguerite LA Burke Foundation

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$184k
Granted FY2022
5
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$154kEducation$61kArts & Culture$49kHuman Services$37kPublic Safety & Disaster$37kYouth Development$13kHousing & Shelter$8kReligion$5kOther$0
02FY2022 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$36,786
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CA METABOLIC RESEARCH FNDN$36,786
HUNTINGTON HOSPITAL-OFFICE OF PHILA$36,786
BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC$36,786
THE BLIND CHILDREN'S CENTER INC$36,786
THE AMERICAN RED CROSS-SGV CHAPTER$36,785
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%UNION STATION FDN: $2k → 14%UNION STATION FDN: $2k → 14%PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $3k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $1k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $37k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$181k · 24 repeat orgs$191k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +68% for those funded once.

24 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2022, 24 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
2

Total granted

$181k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+68%

Still filing today

42%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $184k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’22
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VE
    VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES
    4× · 2017–2020 · $12k · revenue +32%
  • KA
    KIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM
    3× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +46%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA
    4× · 2017–2020 · $10k · revenue +256%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • PS
    PASADENA SENIOR CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +68%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Christian School

The primary mission of the school is to provide its students with the academic training and spiritual nurture needed to become men and women who are worthy representatives of our lord jesus christ.

Education
2
Pasadena Bio Collaborative Incubator

Pasadena bio collaborative incubator is a nonprofit organization focused on economic development and job creation in southern california. we encourage the growth of an innovative biotechnology industry by providing educational/training…

Science & Tech
3
Crestview Preparatory School

We believe childhood is extraordinary. crestview culitivates academic excellence by nurturing individual potential, empowering students to learn joyfully and discover their unique talents within our caring community that fosters belonging.…

Education
4
Childrens Center At Caltech

The center is a non-profit organization providing quality early education and care for infants, toddlers and preschool age children for the caltech and pasadena communities. caring, nurturing educators staff this outstanding program. the…

Human Services
5
Child Educational Center

The child educational center's mission is to ignite joy, curiosity and compassion through innovative children's programs for all.

Human Services
6
Pasadena Museum of California Art

To present the breadth of california art and design through exhibitions that explore the cultural dynamics and influence that are unique to california.

—
7
Hollywood Schoolhouse Inc

Hollywood Schoolhouse knows, values, and encourages fearless curiosity. Through a blended program of innovative academics and structured learning, our diverse community inspires students to be academically strong, artistically proud,…

Education
8
Maranatha High School

Maranatha high school is a christ-centered, evangelical college preparatory school that celebrates the whole student by equipping hearts and minds to reflect god's glory through academics, as well as the arts, athletics, and service. we…

Education
9
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
10
Pasadena Community Access Corp

Provide video production training to the community of pasadena and civic meeting and event coverage. programs produced through the pasadena media studio cablecast on cable channels in the pasadena viewing area.

Arts & Culture
11
The Buckley School

The buckley school is a dynamic, nurturing learning community committed to equity and inclusion. our innovative teachers and challenging programs inspire creativity, courage, and collaboration. by promoting a balanced development of mind,…

—
12
Pasadena Day Nursery for Child

To provide quality educational and physical development programs for pre-kindergarten

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Villa Esperanza Services; the most unlike its peers is Grace Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CA METABOLIC RESEARCH FNDN: $36,786 · OtherCA METABOLIC RESEARCH FNDNHUNTINGTON HOSPITAL-OFFICE OF PHILA: $36,786 · OtherHUNTINGTON HOSPITAL-OFFICE OF PHILATHE AMERICAN RED CROSS-SGV CHAPTER: $36,785 · OtherTHE AMERICAN RED CROSS-SGV CHAPTERHILLSIDES HOME FOR CHILDREN: $18,000 · OtherHILLSIDES HOME FOR CHILDRENPAS CONSERVATORY OF MUSIC: $15,000 · OtherPAS CONSERVATORY OF MUSICPACIFIC CLINICS: $12,000 · OtherPACIFIC CLINICSPASADENA SYMPHONY MUSICAL CIRCUS: $12,000 · OtherPASADENA SYMPHONY MUSICAL CIRCUSYOUNG HEALTHY: $12,000 · OtherYOUNG HEALTHYPASADENA DAY NURSERY FOR CHILD DEVE: $8,000 · Other+9 more: $35,000 · Other+9 moreThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $36,786 · EducationThe Blind Childrens …VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $12,000 · EducationVILLA ESPERANZA SERV…FAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $8,000 · EducationFAMILIES FORWARD LEA…POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $6,000 · EducationPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOLPARTNERSHIP FOR SUCCESS: $6,000 · EducationPARTNERSHIP FOR SUCC…BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $36,786 · Human ServicesBRAILLE INSTI…UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $4,000 · Human ServicesUNION STATION…PASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $3,000 · Human ServicesPASADENA SENI…Foothill Family Service: $2,000 · Human ServicesKIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM: $9,500 · Arts & CultureARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $8,000 · Arts & CultureBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA: $9,500 · Youth DevelopmentPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $8,000 · Health
Other$222,357Education$68,786Human Services$45,786Arts & Culture$17,500Youth Development$9,500Health$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Blind Childrens Center Inc: $36,786 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $36,786 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM: $9,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA: $9,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPasadena Hospital Association Ltd: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $8,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPOLYTECHNIC SCHOOL: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRACE CENTER: $5,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPASADENA SENIOR CENTER: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFoothill Family Service: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds KIDSPACE A PARTICIPATORY MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF PASADENA ↗
  • Who funds ARMORY CENTER FOR THE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds POLYTECHNIC SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR SUCCESS ↗
  • Who funds GRACE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds PASADENA SENIOR CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Foothill Family Service ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rose Hills FoundationCA24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rose Hills Foundation · California Community Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · John Jewett & Helen Chandler Garland Fou Ndation · The Fitzberg Foundation · Ann Peppers Foundation · S Mark Taper Foundation · The Green Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Patron Saints Foundation · Gail G Ellis Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Edmund A & Marguerite LA Burke Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Edmund A & Marguerite LA Burke Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Edmund A & Marguerite LA Burke Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Edmund A & Marguerite LA Burke Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edmund A & Marguerite LA Burke’s filings →

    More from the funding graph