Loading…
· Private foundation
THE EARL AND ANNA BROADY FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$1.4M
Granted FY2024
8
Grants
5
Communities
$450k
Largest
01What you fund
0164% classified
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.
Youth Development$1.5MHuman Services$1.3MEducation$1.2MInternational$1.1MHealth$450kHousing & Shelter$108kOther$3.1M
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
educational
2019
outreacheducational
2020
outreacheducational
2021
outreacheducational
2022
educational
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $50k–250k6 grants · $695k
- $250k+2 grants · $705k
$145,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
- THE PINEY WOODS COUNTRY LIFE SCHOOL$450,000
- THE BIDDY MASON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$255,000
- BRIDGE2RWANDA$200,000
- BECAUSE YOU MATTER$145,000
- AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND$100,000
- THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP$100,000
- ELIZABETH HOUSE$100,000
- VICTORY PRODUCTION$50,000
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15% — the area typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.6M · 16 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else
16 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
16
9
Total granted
$7.6M
$630k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+85%
+105%
Still filing today
63%
33%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TBTHE BIDDY MASON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +412% · 81% of their budget
- BBRIDGE2RWANDA7× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +41%
AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND7× · 2018–2024 · $950k · revenue +118%
Funded once
- LDLA DEPT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY SERVICESone grant, 2018 · $200k
- TPTHE PINEY WOODS SCHOOLgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue +105%
- POPACIFIC OAKS COLLEGEone grant, 2018 · $60k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
The Hope Academy
The hope academy is committed to an educational model focusing on the academic and social success of each individual, preparing students to meet the challenges of the future.
Education
2
Bosque School
Bosque School is a coeducational college preparatory school creating transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate…
Education
3
The College Houses
To maintain an environment and activities conducive to formal and informal education, where self-discovery and exposure to various value systems, academic learning, and experience with management and food operations provide opportunity for…
Education
4
Oak Valley College
Equip students to live, learn, and grow in their faith, service, and calling through a Bachelor of Arts in Business framed by a Christian worldview with no student loans.
Education
5
Dunn School
The mission of the dunn school community is to educate the whole student to their fullest potential in preparation for a life of learning and leadership in society. the school accomplishes this mission by operating a 6-12th grade boarding…
Education
6
Eagle Hill Foundation of
Eagle hill school is a coeducational boarding school that educates students with learning disabilities, including attention deficit disorder, in grades eight through twelve. eagle hill students demonstrate average to above average…
—
7
Bridgton Academy
To provide a program for young men in a unique, one-year postgraduate environment to prepare for the rigors of college and beyond.
Education
8
The Browning School
A college preparatory school for boys instilling the pursuit of academic excellence, a lifelong love of learning, the belief in the dignity of the individual, the development of personal integrity, and a responsibility to the broader…
Education
9
Youth Homes
The mission of youth homes is to help every youth feel safe, have a sense of belonging, and find a place to call home.
Human Services
10
Ambleside School
Ambleside school is a christ-centered school committed to providing a charlotte mason "living education." in partnership with the family, the school guides and empowers each student to think with the mind of christ and to author a life…
Education
11
Reed Institute
Provide education in the liberal arts and sciences
Education
12
Abilene Christian School Inc
The mission of Abilene Christian School, Inc. is to equip students to excel academically, serve meaningfully, and walk faithfully with God.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Olive Crest and the most unlike its peers is American Indian College Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
13 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
12/13
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$3,107,590Youth Development$1,523,029Human Services$1,304,000Education$1,190,932International$1,052,500Health$450,000Housing & Shelter$107,500
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE BIDDY MASON CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE2RWANDA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds BECAUSE YOU MATTER ↗
- Who funds THE TEAK FELLOWSHIP ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
- Who funds THE PINEY WOODS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MORNINGSIDE HIGH MONARCHS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ABODE COMMUNITIES ↗
- Who funds THE NEW SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
- Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE EARL AND ANNA BROADY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BECAUSE YOU MATTER.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~41 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 462755859 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on BECAUSE YOU MATTER, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 41 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 90% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Earl and Anna Broady Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Earl and Anna Broady Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines