· Private foundation
The Eagle Globerman & Kodama Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $170k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| GARDENA VALLEY JAPANESE CULTURAL | $25,000 |
| LITTLE TOKYO SERVICE CENTER | $25,000 |
| JAPANESE AMERICAN MUSEUM | $20,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $20,000 |
| VENICE JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH TORAH | $10,000 |
| GO FOR BROKE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH TORAH | $10,000 |
| JAPANESE AMERICAN CULTURAL & COMMUNITY | $10,000 |
| GLENDORA COMMUNITY COORDINATING | $7,500 |
| JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES | $7,500 |
| THE RAY PFEIFER FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH OHR BROTHERHOOD | $5,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH OHR SISTERHOOD | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $24k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Los Angeles6× · 2020–2025 · $161k · revenue +27%
- 1L1979 LEGACY CORP6× · 2020–2025 · $115k · revenue +42%
- KLKIZUNA LITTLE TOKYO INC4× · 2020–2023 · $40k · revenue +9%
Funded once
- CHCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $20k · revenue -56%
- TCTIDES CENTER - NATIONAL VETERANS NETWORKone grant, 2024 · $10k
- CKCUBBERLEY K-8 SCHOOL - LONG BEACHone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote and foster the understanding and appreciation of japanese and japanese american art, history, and culture. to preserve and disseminate inforation about the japanese american way of life to promote the study of the japanesese…
Serve the needs of the local Japanese American community through educational, cultural, and social programs that share the Japanese and Japanese American cultural heritage.
Keiro's mission is to enhance the quality of senior life in our community. (cont'd on schedule o).
The National Japanese American Historical Society, Inc. (NJAHS) charitable nonprofit organization dedicated to the collection, preservation, authentic interpretation, and sharing of historical information of the Japanese American…
Keiro's mission is to enhance the quality of senior life in our community. (cont'd on schedule o).
The mission of the jccc is to deepen mutual understanding and improve relations between japanese and u.s. businesses through a wide variety of cultural, educational, and charitable programs. to meet its mission, the jccc organizes a series…
Founded in 1905, the japan society of northern california works to advance u.s. - japan collaboration and understanding in a global context. the society offers an array of programs and networking opportunities for people and organizations…
To be a vibrant resource, strengthening our diverse community by educating present and future generations in the evolving japanese american experience in hawaii. we do this through relevant programming, meaningful community service and…
The jewish community center of san francisco believes the jewish culture and traditions provide a pathway for joyful, meaningful living. in a changing world, jccsf brings people together to explore, connect and flourish.
The japan america society of southern california works to (1) promote among the american people a more accurate knowledge of the people of japan, their aims, customs, ideals, arts and sciences, industries, economic conditions, and…
Excellence in senior care reflective of jewish values.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Services and the most unlike its peers is Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds 1979 LEGACY CORP ↗
- Who funds KIZUNA LITTLE TOKYO INC ↗
- Who funds NISEI WEEK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GLENDORA COMMUNITY COORDINATING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds JAPANESE AMERICAN CULTURAL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds VENICE JAPANESE COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE RAY PFEIFER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
- Who funds TOGETHER WE RISE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · The Keith and Cecilia Terasaki Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Eagle Globerman & Kodama Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.