· Private foundation
The E Walter Hausstette Charitable Foundation C/O Mike Moloney Big Sky
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 64% of THE E WALTER HAUSSTETTE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION C/O MIKE MOLONEY BIG SKY’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k31 grants · $155k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WELCOME NEIGHBOR STL | $10,000 |
| JOHN PAUL 2 PREP SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| LOYOLA ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| ST LOUIS CATHOLIC ACADEMY | $5,000 |
| DOGS FOR OUR BRAVE | $5,000 |
| TRINTY LUTHERAN MINISTRIES | $5,000 |
| RENEE'S RESCUE SANCTUARY | $5,000 |
| CHARACTER PLUS | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| JEFFERSON COUNTY VETERANS TRIBUTE | $5,000 |
| SISTERS OF ST FRANCIS OF THE MARYTER SR GEORGE | $5,000 |
| HELPING HANDS & HORSES | $5,000 |
| ST PETER CATHOLIC CHURCH | $5,000 |
| BASKET OF HOPE | $5,000 |
| MARY QUEEN OF ANGELS | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
51 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WNWELCOME NEIGHBOR STL4× · 2019–2024 · $25k · revenue +278%
- CTCOMMUNITY TREATMENT INC3× · 2018–2020 · $25k · revenue +22%
- CLCOALITION LIFE4× · 2018–2023 · $20k · revenue +182%
Funded once
- SPSAFE PLACE ST LOUISone grant, 2017 · $10k
- ONOPTIONS NOWone grant, 2022 · $5k
- LFLift for Life Gym Incgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +42%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide integrated services such as financial assistance, case management, and referrals to families and individuals of all ages to reduce the propensity for homelessness, abuse and neglect, and to provide the tools to achieve…
A faith-based organization providing compassionaite, quality social services to the vulnerable.
St. patrick center transforms lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.
The mission of queen of peace center is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. our purpose is to provide family-centered care for individuals with substance-use…
To provide outpatient and residential rehabilitative services to individuals and families referred by various government agencies. these individuals include substance abusers, intellectually disabled, developmentally disabled, and abused…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
The mission of saint louis counseling is to bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate caring presence. the purpose of saint louis counseling is "guided by the teachings of jesus christ, saint…
Care of unhoused pregnant women and their children.
As a faith-based organization, our mission is to create vibrant communities through affordable quality housing where low and moderate income families can thrive, prosper and build wealth.
Inspired by the gospel of the beatitudes as proclaimed by Jesus Christ, Catholic Charities of Central and Northern Missouri is committed to providing care and creating hope for the lives of the vulnerable through compassionate social…
To bring the healing, help, and hope of jesus christ to those in need with a compassionate, caring presence. our values are dignity, hospitality, service, excellence, compassion, and joy.
To transform lives through sustainable housing, employment and healthcare, following the compassion of jesus.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Child Center-Marygrove and the most unlike its peers is Bi-State Pet Food Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 179 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WELCOME NEIGHBOR STL ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY TREATMENT INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION LIFE ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY FOSTER CHILDRENS FUND ↗
- Who funds KIRK CARE INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT NETWORK ↗
- Who funds BASKET OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds ONE CLASSROOM ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE MISSOURI ↗
- Who funds VITAE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILD CENTER-MARYGROVE ↗
- Who funds LEMAY CHILD AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds FEED MY PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds MISSION ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds HEROES CARE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CRISIS AID INC ↗
- Who funds MATER MEDIA ↗
- Who funds NURSES FOR NEWBORNS ↗
- Who funds BIRTHRIGHT OF HILLSBORO INC ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA ACADEMY OF ST LOUIS ↗
- Who funds INTERSECT ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATION USO OF MISSOURI INC ↗
- Who funds OASIS RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: St Louis Community Foundation Inc · St Louis Community Foundation · Roman Catholic Foundation of Eastern Missouri · United Way of Greater St Louis Inc · Moneta Group Charitable Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · World Wide Technology Foundation · Jefferson Foundation · Youthbridge Community Foundation · Employees Community Fund of the Boeing Company · Norman J Stupp Foundation · Pott Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The E Walter Hausstette Charitable Foundation C/O Mike Moloney Big Sky funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The E Walter Hausstette Charitable Foundation C/O Mike Moloney Big Sky?
Find your warmest path to The E Walter Hausstette Charitable Foundation C/O Mike Moloney Big Sky through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.