Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Dreamville Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$123k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Religion$182kRecreation & Sports$175kYouth Development$139kInternational$110kArts & Culture$71kHousing & Shelter$30kHealth$24kEducation$23kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $23k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$1,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$175k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION$100,000
Individual grant recipient$8,300
NEW CENTURY MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,614
WARRENWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,505
REID ROSS CLASSICAL SCHOOL$1,504
MANCHESTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,500
BILL HEFNER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,500
LUTHER NICK JERALDS MIDDLE SCHOOL$1,499
CLIFFDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,499
EE SMITH HIGH SCHOOL$1,464
BALDWIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,460
WT BROWN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$1,454
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%GOOD COUNSEL INC: $2k → 17%INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
OR
IN
OH
CA
MD
NC
SC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$601k · 10 repeat orgs$221k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
16

Total granted

$601k
$198k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+3%

Still filing today

80%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesReligionHealthCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINISTRY INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $182k · revenue +26%
  • IA
    I AM CULTURED INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $62k · revenue +160% · 26% of their budget
  • 2P
    2-6 PROJECT LIMITED
    3× · 2022–2024 · $27k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • TC
    TECUMSEH CUBS
    one grant, 2020 · $65k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • FA
    FAYETTVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +88%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Durham Home Inc
2
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
3
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services
4
Family Promise of the Coastal Empire Inc

Family promise of the coastal empire, inc. is a nonprofit organization committed to empowering low income families with achieving lasting self sufficiency and independence, by providing short-term housing, meals, and family-centered…

Human Services
5
Bridging Initiatives International

Provide holistic and integrated service that address the diverse needs of vulnerable individuals and families experiencing instability as the result of domestic violence and /or homelessness.

Human Services
6
Divine Vision Incorporated

Permanently end homelessness and to empower individuals and families who reside in poverty stricken communities to achieve housing, economic mental, emotional, and physical change leading to a self-sustaining quality of life.

7
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
8
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
9
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

10
Turning Tables

Turning tables was built by industry mentors and introduced to new orleans with its first graduating class of externs in 2019. what we found that year was a thirst for community within the hospitality industry among black and brown…

Employment
11
Finding Favor Inc
Human Services
12
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fayetteville Urban Ministry Inc and the most unlike its peers is I Am Cultured Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TECUMSEH CUBS — $65,185 · OtherTECUMSEH CUBSIndividual grant recipient — $42,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSALVATION ARMY — $15,000 · OtherEARTHGANG FOUNDATION CORP — $15,000 · OtherSHALOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $24,000 · OtherSHALOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INCNOW SERVING INC — $20,000 · OtherNOW SERVING INC+23 more — $88,859 · Other+23 moreFAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINISTRY INC — $182,012 · ReligionFAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINIS…DOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY — $110,000 · Recreation & SportsDOROTHEA DIX P…DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION — $110,000 · InternationalDIVINE WILL FO…I AM CULTURED INC — $61,500 · Arts & CultureI AM CULT…THE GILBERT THEATER INC — $9,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GILBE…FAYETTVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE — $2,000 · Housing & Shelter2-6 PROJECT LIMITED — $27,000 · Education
Other$300,644Religion$182,012Recreation & Sports$110,000International$110,000Arts & Culture$70,500Housing & Shelter$32,000Education$27,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINISTRY INC — $182,012 over 6y, 6.1% of budgetDOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY — $110,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetDIVINE WILL FOUNDATION — $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetI AM CULTURED INC — $61,500 over 3y, 26% of budgetFAYETTVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY — $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget2-6 PROJECT LIMITED — $27,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetSHALOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC — $24,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetNOW SERVING INC — $20,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetFUSION PARTNERSHIP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GILBERT THEATER INC — $9,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetTHE BRAVE HEART FOUNDATION INC — $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPizza to the Polls — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD COUNSEL INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE — $521 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FAYETTEVILLE URBAN MINISTRY INC
  • Who funds DOROTHEA DIX PARK CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds DIVINE WILL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds I AM CULTURED INC
  • Who funds FAYETTVILLE AREA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
  • Who funds 2-6 PROJECT LIMITED
  • Who funds SHALOM HOUSE MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds NOW SERVING INC
  • Who funds FUSION PARTNERSHIP INC
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ANGEL BY NATURE
  • Who funds THE GILBERT THEATER INC
  • Who funds THE BRAVE HEART FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Pizza to the Polls
  • Who funds INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
  • Who funds GOOD COUNSEL INC
  • Who funds SOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE
  • Who funds DURHAM CHILDREN'S INITIATIVE

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cumberland Community Foundation IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cumberland Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Dreamville Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Fusion Partnership Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph