· Private foundation
The Dorothy and Jim Kronzer Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES | $22,500 |
| CENTRAL TEXAS FOOD BANK | $10,000 |
| GARLAND SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORK - BAYLOR UNIVERSITY OFFICE OF ADVANCEMENT | $10,000 |
| SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON | $7,500 |
| KID'S MEALS INC | $6,000 |
| PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC | $5,000 |
| ERJCC IRVIN KAPLAN CHILDRENS SCHOLARSHIP FUND | $5,000 |
| BRIGHTER BITES | $5,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC | $4,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES ARCHDIOCESE OF GALVESTON - HOUSTON | $3,000 |
| FIRST TEE GREATER HOUSTON | $3,000 |
| ANY BABY CAN | $2,000 |
| GIRLS EMPOWERMENT NETWORK | $2,000 |
| HIGHER HOPE FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| HEARTGIFT | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $155k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
20 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CACHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC5× · 2020–2024 · $120k · revenue +26%
- STSOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON INC4× · 2021–2024 · $38k · revenue +11%
- KMKIDS' MEALS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $32k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- TSTHE SAFE ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $11k · revenue +33%
- BUBAYLOR UNIVERSITY GARLAND SCHOOL OF SOCIAL WORKone grant, 2020 · $10k
- CICOMP-U-DOPT INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +286%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health provides comprehensive and complementary health care services in settings that preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of the individual, advocates…
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
Planned parenthood of greater texas surgical health services was established and maintains operations to support and provide clinical health services to its patients in texas, as permitted by law in the organizations clinical settings.
See Schedule OThe Women's Resource of Greater Houston helps women and girls make choices toward becoming independent, productive, and financially stable. We fulfill our mission by recruiting volunteer instructors to deliver our programs in…
The purpose of Planned Parenthood South Texas ("the Organization") is to provide family planning and sexual healthcare services to both adults and teenagers, with particular emphasis on serving low-income and medically underserved…
Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
First3years nurtures early relational and mental health of infants and toddlers in texas. working in deep collaboration with caregivers, parents, and professionals statewide, we cultivate strong early childhood systems, educate our…
The mission of Breakthrough Houston (BTH) is to work with highly motivated students to achieve post-secondary success and empower aspiring leaders to become the next generation of educational advocates.
Any baby can, an austin-based nonprofit, partners with parents so children reach their full potential. with programs that meet clients where they are at home, work or school any baby can provides in-home therapy, parent education, mental…
The ACLU of Texas works with communities, at the State Capitol, and in the courts to protect and advance civil rights and civil liberties for every Texan, no exceptions.
At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children At Heart Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Second Servings of Houston. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN AT HEART MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Central Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUTH TEXAS COLLEGE OF LAW HOUSTON INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS' MEALS INC ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds JEREMIAH PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds SECOND SERVINGS OF HOUSTON ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Houston Golf Association Youth Program Inc dba First Tee of Greater Houston ↗
- Who funds CASA MARIANELLA INC ↗
- Who funds BookSpring ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN PARTNERS IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds COMP-U-DOPT INC ↗
- Who funds CHERISH OUR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds Brighter Bites Inc ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds The Ann Richards School Foundation ↗
- Who funds Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast Inc ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GENAUSTIN ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN DIAPER BANK ↗
- Who funds HEARTGIFT FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · The Powell Foundation · St David's Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Rachael and Ben Vaughan Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · The Applied Materials Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Dorothy and Jim Kronzer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.