Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dorothea and Leo Rabkin Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$651k
Granted FY2025still arriving
76
Grants FY2025still arriving
26
States reached
$52k
Largest
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$4.8MPhilanthropy$58kEducation$16kSocial Science$15kInternational$11kHuman Services$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 76 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k61 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $92k
  • $50k–250k9 grants · $466k
$500
Median grant
26
States reached
$26M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$52,000
Individual grant recipient$52,000
Individual grant recipient$52,000
Individual grant recipient$52,000
J WORTHAM$52,000
Individual grant recipient$52,000
Individual grant recipient$52,000
Individual grant recipient$52,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
LOCAL MEDIA FOUNDATION$20,000
HIGH MUSEUM OF ART$16,500
ARTADIA$15,000
INDIGO ARTS ALLIANCE$15,000
NATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS$15,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LOCAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $20k → 13%INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION: $5k → 7%INDEPENDENCE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
WA
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

17%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$824k · 26 repeat orgs$4.1M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 60 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
132

Total granted

$824k
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+4%

Still filing today

62%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 21% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $507k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesSocial ScienceCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM
    4× · 2018–2024 · $63k · revenue +84%
  • UO
    Union of Maine Visual Artists Inc
    5× · 2018–2024 · $43k · revenue ×17 · 36% of their budget
  • IA
    Indigo Arts Alliance
    5× · 2019–2025 · $41k · revenue +329%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $51k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $51k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $51k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
2
New Museum of Contemporary Art

A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.

Arts & Culture
3
Berggruen Institute
Education
4
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
5
Art Ambassador
—
6
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
7
California Institute of Contemporary Art
—
8
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
9
The Florence Center for Contemporary Music
Arts & Culture
10
Art Foundation
Arts & Culture
11
Kansas City Artists Coalition Inc

The kansas city atrtists coalition is a nonprofit organization that promotes visual arts awareness

Arts & Culture
12
Contemporary Art Group

To educate the public about important art and improving the public's access to it through curated programming.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is John Michael Kohler Arts Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Art Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 221 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
37/37
Grantees still filing
25/37
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

+167 more: $4,338,550 · Other+167 moreAMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM: $63,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN F…AMERICAN ABSTRACT ARTISTS INC: $55,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN A…Indigo Arts Alliance: $40,500 · Arts & CultureIndigo Art…THE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureTHE BROOKL…JOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $35,500 · Arts & CultureJOHN MICHA…BURNAWAY INC: $27,500 · Arts & CultureBURNAWAY I…ROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $26,500 · Arts & CultureROBERT W W…Glasstire: $21,500 · Arts & CultureNew Art Association: $20,000 · Arts & CultureALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS: $15,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more: $77,100 · Arts & Culture+11 moreROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyARTCOUNCIL INC DBA ARTADIA: $20,200 · Philanthropy+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyLOCAL MEDIA FOUNDATION: $20,000 · Human ServicesIndependence Association Inc: $8,000 · Human ServicesPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $10,500 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC: $7,500 · EducationMAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $2,500 · EducationCREATIVE PORTLAND CORPORATION: $16,250 · Community ImprovementTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $14,500 · Social ScienceGlobal Impact: $10,600 · International
Other$4,338,550Arts & Culture$441,600Philanthropy$71,200Human Services$28,000Education$20,500Community Improvement$16,250Social Science$14,500International$10,600

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM: $63,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN ABSTRACT ARTISTS INC: $55,000 over 2y, 71% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnion of Maine Visual Artists Inc: $42,500 over 5y, 36% of budgetIndigo Arts Alliance: $40,500 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN RAIL INC: $40,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetJOHN MICHAEL KOHLER ARTS CENTER INC: $35,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBURNAWAY INC: $27,500 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $26,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGlasstire: $21,500 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetARTCOUNCIL INC DBA ARTADIA: $20,200 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNEW ART PUBLICATIONS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetALLIED MEDIA PROJECTS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCREATIVE PORTLAND CORPORATION: $16,250 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $14,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF CONTEMPORARY ART LOS ANGELES: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH DESERT TEST SITES: $11,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGlobal Impact: $10,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRESIDENT AND TRUSTEES OF BATES COLLEGE: $10,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRICK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetIntuitCenter for IntuitiveOutsider Art: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSPEEDWELL PROJECTS: $10,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetIndependence Association Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPALM SPRINGS ART MUSEUM: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARCHITECTURAL LEAGUE OF NEW YORK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCREATE WISCONSIN INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN VISIONARY ART MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALERIE J MAYNARD FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAINE COLLEGE OF ART AND DESIGN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WILLIAM A FARNSWORTH LIBRARY AND ART MUSEUM INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPACE Gallery: $1,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ABSTRACT ARTISTS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME25.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Onion Foundation · The Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts Inc · The Wilhelm Family Foundation Co Cascade Wilhelm · Terra Foundation for American Art · The Andrew W Mellon Foundation · Via Art Fund Inc · Maine Initiativesinc · Maine Humanities Council · Rdk Foundation · Spectemur Agendo Inc · The Horace W Goldsmith Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dorothea and Leo Rabkin Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dorothea and Leo Rabkin Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The American Visionary Art Museum Inc: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Dorothea and Leo Rabkin Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Dorothea and Leo Rabkin Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 221 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dorothea and Leo Rabkin’s filings →

More from the funding graph