· Private foundation
The Donna and Marvin Schwartz Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 70% of THE DONNA AND MARVIN SCHWARTZ FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $78k
- $250k+2 grants · $9.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE SERVICES | $7,250,000 |
| JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND | $2,000,000 |
| MECOX BAY CONSERVANCY | $25,000 |
| NEW YORK HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $13,000 |
| TROOPATHON | $10,000 |
| PHOENIX HOUSE | $10,000 |
| CONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF PETACH | $8,000 |
| THE BRUCE MUSEUM | $7,610 |
| THE METROPOLITAN OPERA ASSOCIATION INC | $5,574 |
| POLICE BENEVOLENT ASSOC TOWN OF BEDFORD | $5,000 |
| JUPITER ISLAND PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT | $5,000 |
| MIANUS RIVER GORGE INC | $4,000 |
| DAVIDSON COLLEGE | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
66 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $59k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TNTHE NEUBERGER BERMAN FOUNDATION2× · 2020–2021 · $450k · revenue +17%
- HMHorace Mann School2× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +7%
- CPCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC4× · 2017–2022 · $279k · revenue +76%
Funded once
- EUEMORY UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $160k
- MIMANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $119k · revenue +26%
- CECONGREGATION EMANUELone grant, 2023 · $75k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The museum of jewish heritage - a living memorial to the holocaust is new york's contribution to the global responsibility to never forget. see schedule o for additional information.
The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Neuberger Berman Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 168 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
- Who funds THE NEUBERGER BERMAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Horace Mann School ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BARUCH COLLEGE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE DOE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FOLK ART MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds New York Historical Society ↗
- Who funds BIDEAWEE INC ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN INSTITUTE FOR POLICY RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE NEUBERGER MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN ENVIRONMENTAL FILM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA O'KEEFFE MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds THE BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETYINC ↗
- Who funds THE GLAUCOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Opera Association Inc ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds TROOPATHON ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Bahamas Humane Society Inc ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
- Who funds GREENWICH COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds ARTSCONNECTION INC ↗
- Who funds Westchester Land Trust Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL MUSEUM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Peckham Family Foundation · The Goldstein Family Foundation · Yvonne & Leslie Pollack Family Foundation Inc · Lanbro Foundation · The Richardson Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Hycliff Foundation · The Grunebaum Family Fund · The Worby Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Donna and Marvin Schwartz Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Donna and Marvin Schwartz Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Donna and Marvin Schwartz Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.