Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donald McNeeley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$58k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Education$44kHuman Services$15kInternational$11kHealth$11kRecreation & Sports$11kHousing & Shelter$10kCommunity Improvement$10kPhilanthropy$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$994k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SOUTH BEND YOUTH HOCKEY$10,000
FABRICATORS & MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION$10,000
BUILD EACH OTHER UP$10,000
PENFED FOUNDATION$5,000
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
GUARDIAN ANGELS$1,332
PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER$541
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $11k → 7%HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $479 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
IA
IN
OH
PA
VA
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$75k · 12 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
8

Total granted

$75k
$18k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+40%

Still filing today

17%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 28% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GUARDIAN ANGELS
    3× · 2022–2024 · $14k
  • TH
    THE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $11k · revenue +37%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2022–2023 · $7k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • TW
    THE WOMAN'S BOARD OF RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • JL
    JOHN & LESA WIBERG ENDOWMENT
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Ann & robert h. lurie children's hospital of chicago is dedicated to the health and well-being of all children. as the pediatric teaching facility for northwestern university feinberg school of medicine, this commitment drives us to be a…

Health
2
Heal Chicago

To strengthen communities through educational dialogue, leadership development, emotional resilience, and intercultural competence programs that help people bridge differences and build trust.

Public Benefit
3
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
4
Stanley Manne Childrens Research Institute

Stanley manne children's research institute strives to generate new knowledge and advance the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric diseases.

Health
5
Illinois Children's Healthcare Foundation
Human Services
6
United Way of Illinois

Strengthen United Way movement in Illinois

Philanthropy
7
Students Run Chicago
Health
8
Hugo W Moser Research Institute At Kennedy Krieger Inc

The hugo w. moser research institute at kennedy krieger, inc. (the "research institute") is an internationally recognized research facility finding answers to problems and injuries that affect a child's developing brain. researchers have…

Science & Tech
9
Chicago Hope Inc

Chicago Hope runs a food pantry twice a week that serves over 100 families. The organization is working toward the furtherance of wrap around services.

Human Services
10
Servingunderserved Inc

To serve the underserved through the continual development and growth of programs designed to improve the health of underserved and disadvantaged people. in the context of these general purposes, the corporation shall apply for grants or…

—
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is People's Resource Center; the most unlike its peers is South Bend Youth Hockey Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GUARDIAN ANGELS: $14,335 · OtherGUARDIAN ANGELSFABRICATORS & MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherFABRICATORS & MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $6,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherPENFED FOUNDATION: $5,000 · OtherTHE WOMAN'S BOARD OF RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000 · Other+7 more: $6,641 · Other+7 moreTHE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $11,479 · Human ServicesTHE HUMAN…Build Each Other Up NFP: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUTH BEND YOUTH HOCKEY INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 · HealthNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 · HealthLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $1,000 · HealthHINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 · Animals4 KIDS SAKE INC: $471 · Food & NutritionMcKendree University: $200 · Education
Other$94,976Human Services$11,479Housing & Shelter$10,000Recreation & Sports$10,000Health$6,000Animals$1,000Food & Nutrition$471Education$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT: $11,479 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBuild Each Other Up NFP: $10,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetSOUTH BEND YOUTH HOCKEY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLewy Body Dementia Association Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER: $541 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMcKendree University: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HUMANITARIAN SERVICE PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Build Each Other Up NFP ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH BEND YOUTH HOCKEY INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PKU ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Lewy Body Dementia Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds HINSDALE HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds 4 KIDS SAKE INC ↗
  • Who funds McKendree University ↗
  • Who funds Crystal Lake South High School Booster Club ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donald McNeeley Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donald McNeeley Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald McNeeley’s filings →

    More from the funding graph