Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donald F and Elizabeth Gardner Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$136kPhilanthropy$103kHuman Services$87kRecreation & Sports$79kYouth Development$62kHealth$55kEnvironment$47kArts & Culture$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $80k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOOSE CHARITIES$20,000
RED ARROW FOUNDATION$15,000
ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF KEWAUNEE COUNTY INC$15,000
CDGA$10,000
THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE$10,000
BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$7,000
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION$5,000
IL FIREFIGHTERS ALLIANCE$2,000
LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND$2,000
GLENVIEW LIONS CLUB$2,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S$2,000
ST JUDES$2,000
SUSAN G KOMEN$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%K9 COMPANIONS INC: $1k → 11%K9 COMPANIONS INC: $1k → 11%K9 COMPANIONS INC: $1k → 11%K9 COMPANIONS INC: $1k → 11%K9 COMPANIONS INC: $1k → 11%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%K9 COMPANIONS INC: $500 → 11%CENTER OF CONCERN: $10k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $10k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $8k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $1k → 14%CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NV
NJ
CA
VA
KS
TN
HI
LA
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$706k · 37 repeat orgs$143k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

37
19

Total granted

$706k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+45%

Still filing today

38%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyHealthAnimalsEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MOOSE CHARITIES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +74%
  • RA
    RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $42k · revenue +151%
  • CU
    CALDWELL UNIVERSITY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $40k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • M
    MOOSEHEART
    one grant, 2018 · $35k
  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $15k · revenue +126%
  • NS
    NJ SHARING NETWORK
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
2
Illinois Health and Hospital Association

To advocate for and support hospitals and health systems as they serve patients and communities in illinois.

—
3
Mchc Chicago Hospital Council

The mission of mchc chicago hospital council is to foster, promote, support, develop and encourage charitable, educational, scholastic and scientific purposes; promote cooperative effort and action between hospitals and other health care…

Health
4
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
5
Chicago Municipal Employee's Credit Union

To give members the ability to control their financial destiny by providing members with the means to satisfy their needs for financial services in a comfortable family-like environment. in doing so, the credit union strives to maintain…

—
6
Illinois Manufacturers' Association

To strengthen the economic social environmental and governmental conditions for manufacturing and allied enterprises in the state of illinois, resulting in an englarged business base and increased employment.

—
7
Volunteers of America of Illinois

Volunteers of america of illinois partners with the people we serve to create transformational and lasting change in their lives through programs that support, empower, and transform.

—
8
The Saint Louis Zoo Association

The saint louis zoo association was established to support and enhance the saint louis zoo by providing facilities, funds, and advice. the association provides direct financial support to the zoo for renovations, new facilities, programs,…

Animals
9
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
10
Racine Zoological Society Inc

The mission of the racine zoological society is to foster an enlightening and affordable wildlife experience that improves the bond between people and nature. the society will provide for the recreation and education of the people, the…

Animals
11
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
12
Illinois College

Illinois college is a co-educational institution of higher education learning providing a four-year educational program leading to the baccalaureate degree. illinois college is a community committed to the highest standards of scholarship…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is K9 Companions Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
20/25
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CDGA: $64,500 · OtherCDGAEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $56,000 · OtherEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATIONBRIGHT FUTURES: $50,000 · OtherBRIGHT FUTURESRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC: $42,000 · OtherRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INCMOOSEHEART: $35,000 · OtherMOOSEHEARTIndividual grant recipient: $34,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSTEPPING STONES: $32,500 · OtherSTEPPING STONESWINGS - WOMEN IN GODS SERVICE MINISTRY: $29,500 · OtherCHICAGO DISTRICT GOLF ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $22,000 · Other+37 more: $178,800 · Other+37 moreMOOSE CHARITIES INC: $80,000 · PhilanthropyMOOSE CHARIT…Lions Clubs International Foundation: $8,000 · PhilanthropyLions Clubs …+2 more: $4,000 · PhilanthropyCALDWELL UNIVERSITY INC: $40,000 · EducationBRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $47,000 · EnvironmentTHE CENTER OF CONCERN: $28,000 · Human ServicesK9 Companions Inc: $5,500 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $3,500 · Human ServicesHome of the Sparrow Inc: $26,000 · Housing & ShelterST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,500 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $7,000 · HealthILLINOIS FIRE SAFETY ALLIANCE: $3,000 · Health
Other$569,300Philanthropy$92,000Education$55,000Environment$47,000Human Services$42,000Housing & Shelter$26,000Health$20,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMOOSE CHARITIES INC: $80,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WETLANDS INITIATIVE: $47,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetRED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC: $42,000 over 3y, 4.3% of budgetCALDWELL UNIVERSITY INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER OF CONCERN: $28,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHome of the Sparrow Inc: $26,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO DISTRICT GOLF ASSOCIATION: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $22,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF KEWAUNEE COUNTY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLions Clubs International Foundation: $8,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetK9 Companions Inc: $5,500 over 6y, 6.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHICAGO LIGHTHOUSE FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS FIRE SAFETY ALLIANCE: $3,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROBERT R MCCORMICK FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetILLINOIS FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE STATE LODGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE CHICAGO LODGE NO 7: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChicago Zoological Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLENVIEW PARK FOUNDATION INC: $400 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MOOSE CHARITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WETLANDS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds RED ARROW CAMP FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CALDWELL UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER OF CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds Home of the Sparrow Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO DISTRICT GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF KEWAUNEE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Lions Clubs International Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds K9 Companions Inc ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS OF ILLINOIS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL12.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · AbbVie Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donald F and Elizabeth Gardner Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donald F and Elizabeth Gardner Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Caldwell University Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donald F and Elizabeth Gardner’s filings →

More from the funding graph