Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Donald and Donna Adam Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$996k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$4.5MEducation$4.0MAnimals$1.7MHousing & Shelter$890kFood & Nutrition$490kHuman Services$445kPublic Safety & Disaster$323kYouth Development$273kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k15 grants · $338k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $625k
$20,900
Median grant
4
States reached
$69M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
The George & Barbara Bush Foundation$200,000
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$125,000
The Boys & Girls Club of the Brazos Valley$100,000
Individual grant recipient$100,000
BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK$50,000
St Jude Children's Research Hospital$50,000
Scotty's House$45,000
AGGIELAND HUMANE SOCIETY$40,000
Individual grant recipient$30,300
Voices for Children$30,000
Individual grant recipient$26,590
Individual grant recipient$25,400
Queen of Peace Catholic Church$25,000
BRAZOS CHURCH PANTRY$25,000
Individual grant recipient$20,900
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $492k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $25k → 5%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $220k → 14%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $25k → 5%UNLIMITED POTENTIAL: $70k → 22%UNLIMITED POTENTIAL: $15k → 22%UNLIMITED POTENTIAL: $15k → 22%Ballet Brazos: $3k → 22%BALLET BRAZOS: $3k → 22%BALLET BRAZOS: $1k → 22%Voices for Children: $30k → 22%Voices for Children: $30k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $10k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 22%VOICES FOR CHILDREN: $5k → 22%BCS TOGETHER: $6k → 22%BCS TOGETHER: $6k → 22%BCS TOGETHER: $5k → 22%BCS TOGETHER: $5k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CT
CO
MO
KY
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$9.5M · 55 repeat orgs$3.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 23 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
54

Total granted

$9.5M
$3.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

36%
19%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $351k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    7× · 2017–2025 · $3.5M · revenue +33%
  • AH
    Aggieland Humane Society
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +80% · 45% of their budget
  • BV
    BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $415k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • CS
    COLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • BI
    BRYAN INDPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M
  • SH
    Saratoga Hospital Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $500k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
3
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
4
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
5
Baylor University Medical Center

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
6
Texas Children's Health Plan

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
7
Texas Children's

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education, and research.

Health
8
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
9
Baylor Scott & White Holdings

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
10
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Mhs Physicians of Texas

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
12
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Children's Hospital; the most unlike its peers is KIDZ1STFUND Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

32 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 32 of the 116 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/32
Grantees still filing
21/32
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL: $1,000,000 · OtherCOLLEGE STATION INDEPENDENT SCHOOLBRYAN INDPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT: $1,000,000 · OtherBRYAN INDPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICTHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $750,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYALLEN ACADEMY: $736,588 · OtherALLEN ACADEMYSaratoga Hospital Foundation: $500,000 · OtherSaratoga Hospital FoundationThe Boys & Girls Club of the Brazos Valley: $265,000 · Other+90 more: $2,227,857 · Other+90 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,471,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc+5 more: $152,500 · HealthAggieland Humane Society: $1,745,000 · AnimalsAggieland Huma…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $220,000 · Human ServicesUnlimited Potential Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesVoices for Children Inc: $95,000 · Human ServicesPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $50,000 · Human ServicesBCS Together: $21,000 · Human Services+1 more: $6,000 · Human ServicesBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $415,000 · Food & NutritionTHE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION: $200,000 · EducationSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $80,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $50,000 · EducationITHACA COLLEGE: $30,000 · EducationPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of the Brazos Valley: $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$6,479,445Health$3,624,000Animals$1,745,000Human Services$492,000Food & Nutrition$415,000Education$360,000Philanthropy$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $3,471,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetAggieland Humane Society: $1,745,000 over 9y, 45% of budgetBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $415,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $220,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $110,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnlimited Potential Inc: $100,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetVoices for Children Inc: $95,000 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetSOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY: $80,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBRAZOS CHURCH PANTRY INC: $75,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC: $37,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSARATOGA WARHORSE FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetITHACA COLLEGE: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of the Brazos Valley: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE JOCKEY CLUB SAFETY NET FOUNDATION: $22,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetPINK ALLIANCE: $22,500 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetBCS Together: $21,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN LEBANESE SYRIAN ASSOCIATED CHARITIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $10,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTwin City Mission: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKIDZ1STFUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBALLET BRAZOS: $6,000 over 3y, 12% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSARATOGA SPRINGS PRESERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHealth for All Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRUG FREE AMERICA FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds Aggieland Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Texas Children's Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Unlimited Potential Inc ↗
  • Who funds Voices for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOS CHURCH PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
  • Who funds PERMANENTLY DISABLED JOCKEYS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MUSEUM OF RACING INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable TrustMO20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · The John & Sally Godfrey Family Foundation · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · United Way of the Brazos Valley · Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable · St Joseph Regional Health Center · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Donald and Donna Adam Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Donald and Donna Adam Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Donald and Donna Adam Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Donald and Donna Adam Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 116 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald and Donna Adam Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph