· Public charity
St Joseph Regional Health Center
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $117k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $207k
- $250k+1 grant · $5.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TEXAS A&M HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER | $5,327,746 |
| BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK | $57,000 |
| PROJECT UNITY | $50,000 |
| HEALTH FOR ALL | $50,000 |
| THE ROSE | $50,000 |
| PRENATAL CLINIC | $46,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF BRAZOS VALLEY | $30,000 |
| A HOPEFUL HARVEST | $20,500 |
| TWIN CITY MISSION INC | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against -67% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $121k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBURLESON ST JOSEPH HEALTH CENTER2× · 2021–2023 · $856k · revenue +12%
- BMBrazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic5× · 2021–2025 · $165k · revenue +22%
- BVBRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC3× · 2021–2025 · $77k · revenue +30%
Funded once
- SJST JOSEPH FOUNDATION OF BRYAN TEXASone grant, 2017 · $2.5M · revenue -67% · 78% of their budget
- SJST JOSEPH MANORone grant, 2021 · $141k · revenue -98%
- LDLIBERTY DIALYSIS-BRYAN LLCone grant, 2021 · $68k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To deliver the highest value patient experience through quality, safety, accessibility, and cost-effectiveness, enhanced by medical education and research in collaboration with Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH).
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
To provide healthcare services to the patients and communities served in the lake jackson, texas area with excellence and compassion.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
To foster and support the activities and purposes of Baylor Scott & White Health, to encourage broad-based public support of the health care system and its affiliated institutions, and to advance the medical objectives, including…
As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.
To increase the number of healthy families in our community by providing high quality, comprehensive health services.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Burleson St Joseph Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Unity Partners. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST JOSEPH FOUNDATION OF BRYAN TEXAS ↗
- Who funds BURLESON ST JOSEPH HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds Brazos Maternal and Child Health Clinic ↗
- Who funds ST JOSEPH MANOR ↗
- Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds THE ROSE ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Brazos Valley ↗
- Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
- Who funds Unity Partners ↗
- Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
- Who funds COMMONSPIRIT HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · St Joseph Services Corporation · Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable · Bubba Moore Memorial Group Inc · Mervin and Annete Peters Family Foundation · United Way of the Brazos Valley · The Donald and Donna Adam Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St Joseph Regional Health Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.