· Private foundation
Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $7k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $142k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYS CLUBS OF BRAZOS COUNTY INC | $29,000 |
| BRYAN COLLEGE STA PUBLIC LIBRARY SYSTEM | $28,000 |
| TRINITY UNIVERSITY | $25,000 |
| BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER INC | $22,000 |
| BRAZOS VALLEY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY | $22,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC | $16,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF THE BRAZOS VALLEY INC | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 88% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
11 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BCBoys Club of Brazos County Inc8× · 2017–2025 · $158k · revenue +51%
- TUTrinity University8× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +83%
- BVBRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER6× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- TUTRINITY UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $25k
- BCBRYAN COLLEGE STATION PUBLIC LIBRARY Sone grant, 2023 · $25k
- BCBRYAN COLLEGE STATION PUBLIC LIBRARYone grant, 2024 · $24k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To educate, unite and focus our community's resources in order to efficiently address the most critical needs of Brazoria County
The mission of the Children's Museum of the Brazos Valley is to provide a child-centered, hands-on, interactive environment for learning and discovery.
To provide community-centered prenatal care and health education to medically indigent pregnant women in the Brazos Valley. Comprehensive, accessible and affordable prenatal care and health education are the best ways to improve pregnancy…
To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our community in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in any…
To provide community, life-long learning, and meaningful work for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
To facilitate research and development within the texas a&m university system and selected other entities.
To provide quality services and products to the residents and businesses of our communities in such a way as to maximize the affordability of safe and decent housing, especially for the low income; and to serve as a vehicle and assist in…
To provide guidance and support for persons affected by alcohol and substance abuse.
to prevent blindness and preserve sight through education, certified vision screening and training, advocacy, research and community and patient service programs
To ensure that the student body experiences balanced intellectual, psychological, social and spiritual development, aimed at enabling them to become active productive members of society where they live and work.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
Comprehensive service to domestic violence and sexual assault victims
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Brazos Valley and the most unlike its peers is Temple Memorial Pediatric Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
- Who funds Trinity University ↗
- Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY REHABILITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds Brazos Valley Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds TEMPLE MEMORIAL PEDIATRIC CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds United Way of the Brazos Valley ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BRAZOS VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds Health for All Inc ↗
- Who funds College Station ISD Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Virginia & Christian Groneman Charitable · M Bookman Peters Charitable Foundation · Orr James Donald Charitable Trust · Marshall and Ellen Peters Family Foundation · Mervin and Annete Peters Family Foundation · B Don & Becky Russell Charitable Foundat
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clifton C & Henrietta C Doak Charitable funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.