· Private foundation
The Doe Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $205k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $855k
- $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK | $550,000 |
| PINE STREET INN | $500,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF CAPE COD | $250,000 |
| ST FRANCIS HOUSE | $250,000 |
| COMMUNITY SERVINGS | $100,000 |
| FAMILY AID BOSTON | $100,000 |
| ROSIE'S PLACE | $100,000 |
| NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK | $90,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $85,000 |
| BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS | $80,000 |
| CAPE COD COUNCIL OF CHURCHES | $50,000 |
| CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC | $50,000 |
| HOUSING FAMILIES | $50,000 |
| LOVIN SPOONFULS | $50,000 |
| VICTORY PROGRAMS INC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.
61 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 35 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $325k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GBGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC8× · 2017–2024 · $2.5M · revenue +89%
PINE STREET INN INC7× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +123%- SFSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +173%
Funded once
PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +31%- TUTHE URBAN FOOD INITIATIVE INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +169%
- CCCAPE COD COUNICL OF CHone grant, 2017 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Food link is working to create a more equitable food system throughout greater boston by rescuing and distributing high-quality, customized food to under-resourced communities and by advocating for systems change.
Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…
Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Metro housing boston mobilizes wide-ranging resources to provide innovative and personalized services that lead families and individuals to housing stability, economic security, and an improved quality of life.
Household goods provides a full range of donated furniture and household items, free of charge, to help people in need make a home.
The organization's mission is to prevent and end hunger and homelessness by providing integrated services that promote long-term stability, health, and independence. (see schedule o for full description)
The food bank of western massachusetts' mission is to feed our neighbors in need and lead the community to end hunger. the food bank provides food both directly and through its member food pantries, meal sites, shelters and other social…
Driven by the belief that access to healthy food is a basic right for all people, feeding westchester leads hunger action programs and mobilizes the resources needed to eradicate hunger in westchester county.
Brookview's mission is to help homeless and at risk families learn the skills necessary to break the cycle of homelessness and poverty.
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Open Door Cape Ann Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Natural Resources Defense Council Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVINGS INC ↗
- Who funds CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC ↗
- Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds Good Shepherd Food Bank ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds SPOONFULS ↗
- Who funds NUYA INC ↗
- Who funds VICTORY PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAPE COD INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S LUNCH PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILYAID BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds HORIZONS FOR HOMELESS CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds VERMONT FOODBANK ↗
- Who funds BEVERLY BOOTSTRAPS COMMUNITY SERVICES I ↗
- Who funds THE OPEN DOOR CAPE ANN FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
- Who funds The Food Project Inc ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds CAPE COD TIMES NEIGHBORS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ONLY A CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds GAINING GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds HALEY HOUSE INC & AFFILIATES ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · Yawkey Foundation II · Agnes M Lindsay Trust · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · The Frederick E Weber Charities Corp · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Arbella Insurance Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Doe Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Reach Inc — 85% of income from government
- Victory Programs Inc — 49% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Bridges from School to Work Inc — 33% of income from government
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Community Harvest Project Inc — 18% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Housing Families Inc — 12% of income from government
- Woodwell Climate Research Center Inc — 11% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- Gaining Ground Inc — 5% of income from government
- Familyaid Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- Massachusetts Audubon Society Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Doe Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Doe Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.