Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dobranski Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$73k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$82kArts & Culture$80kAnimals$27kPhilanthropy$12kReligion$3kHuman Services$1kEnvironment$1kInternational$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$1,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$329k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE INNER LOOP$53,030
THE SIDWELL FRIENDS FUND$5,850
LOWELL SCHOOL$5,000
PENFAULKNER$2,541
TEMPLE BETH-EL ITACHA NY$1,874
YALE UNIVERSITY$1,500
CORNELL UNIVERSITY$1,500
IFAW$1,057
RORSCHACH THEATRE$500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF DC$160
YALE CLUB OF DC$153
WIKIMEDIA$104
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $726) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM: $515 → 8%VAN NESS MAIN STREET: $106 → 14%VAN NESS MAIN STREET INC: $105 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
NY
MA
OR
CT
CA
MD
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$184k · 15 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
25

Total granted

$184k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+51%

Still filing today

67%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LOWELL SCHOOL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $62k · revenue +32%
  • WH
    WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY
    6× · 2017–2023 · $16k · revenue +67%
  • Cornell University
    6× · 2020–2025 · $8k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • CS
    CORNELL SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICI
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • WM
    Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +44%
  • SL
    SMITHSONIAN LIBRARIES
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Womens Writing Guild

IWWG empowers women writers with workshops events and community gatherings to encourage writing speaking and publishing

Education
2
Washington Performing Arts Society

Washington performing arts champions the arts as a unifying force. through collaborations with artists, educators, community leaders, and institutional partners, we bring wide-ranging artistic programs to stages, schools, and neighborhoods…

Arts & Culture
3
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
6
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
7
Museum of Modern Art

The Museum of Modern Art is a private, non-profit institution chartered by the State of New York Department of Education in 1929 to foster public awareness of modern and contemporary art. (Continued in Schedule O)

Arts & Culture
8
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
9
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
10
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
11
Graywolf Press

Graywolf press publishes risk-taking, visionary writers who transform culture through literature. when writers are free to do their most ambitious work, their books serve as portals to new possibilities and enable deeper understanding…

Arts & Culture
12
New York City Center Inc

The mission of new york city center is to be new york city's leading center for dance and musical theater. dedicated to making the arts accessible to the broadest possible audience, city center seeks to create a welcoming environment and…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Van Ness Group Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
16/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LOWELL SCHOOL: $62,225 · EducationLOWELL SCHOOLCornell University: $7,600 · EducationCornell University+2 more: $270 · EducationInner Loop Inc: $59,041 · Arts & CultureInner Loop IncWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $5,000 · Arts & CultureWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company IncRORSCHACH THEATRE: $3,190 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $1,326 · Arts & CultureTHE SIDWELL FRIENDS FUND: $11,733 · OtherTHE SIDWELL FRIENDS FUNDYALE UNIVERSITY: $9,788 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYCORNELL SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICI: $5,000 · OtherCORNELL SCHOOL OF VETERINA…PEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION: $4,331 · OtherPEN FAULKNER FOUNDATIONSMITHSONIAN LIBRARIES: $3,300 · OtherSMITHSONIAN LIBRARIESYALE UNIVERSITY: $2,500 · OtherJAMES SMITHSON SOCIETY: $2,500 · OtherTEMPLE BETH-EL ITACHA NY: $1,874 · Other+16 more: $9,323 · Other+16 moreWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,430 · AnimalsWASHINGTON…INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $4,057 · AnimalsINTERNATIO…+1 more: $35 · AnimalsInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 · InternationalPARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC: $515 · Human ServicesVan Ness Group Inc: $211 · Human ServicesWORLDBUILDERS INC: $473 · Philanthropy
Education$70,095Arts & Culture$68,557Other$50,349Animals$20,522International$1,000Human Services$726Philanthropy$473

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOWELL SCHOOL: $62,225 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetInner Loop Inc: $59,041 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,430 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCornell University: $7,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION: $4,331 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC: $4,057 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRORSCHACH THEATRE: $3,190 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetThe Writers Center: $1,167 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC: $515 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAVALON THEATRE PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDBUILDERS INC: $473 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHARMONIC MUSIC FOUNDATION: $256 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL LINKS TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVan Ness Group Inc: $211 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS: $170 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PHILLIPS COLLECTION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXERCES SOCIETY INC: $35 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCIENCE SPARK: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOWELL SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Inner Loop Inc ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds Cornell University ↗
  • Who funds Woolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds PEN FAULKNER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
  • Who funds RORSCHACH THEATRE ↗
  • Who funds The Writers Center ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds PARENT ENCOURAGEMENT PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds AVALON THEATRE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE CHESAPEAKE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLDBUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds HARMONIC MUSIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL LINKS TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Van Ness Group Inc ↗
  • Who funds HILLWOOD ESTATE MUSEUM & GARDENS ↗
  • Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Washington Community FoundationDC16.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Washington Community Foundation · Nora Roberts Foundation · Harold Rubenstein Family Charitable Foundation · The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Latino Economic Development Corporation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dobranski Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dobranski Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Parent Encouragement Program Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Xerces Society Inc: 22% of income from government
  • The Writers Center: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dobranski’s filings →

More from the funding graph