Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Do & Rickles Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$261k
Granted FY2025still arriving
26
Grants FY2025still arriving
14
States reached
$58k
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20182025.

Education$675kHealth$592kArts & Culture$287kInternational$191kRecreation & Sports$124kHuman Services$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$22kPhilanthropy$2kFood & Nutrition$50Other$1.3M
02FY2025 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k19 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $67k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $160k
$2,500
Median grant
14
States reached
$22k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$57,891
PAPER MILL PLAYHOUSE$52,500
FRIENDS OF FIU EMBRACE$50,000
FIU FOUNDATION INC$25,000
GABLESTAGE$22,291
PROFECTUM FOUNDATION$10,000
INSTITUTE FOR EXCEPTIONAL CARE$10,000
FOUNDATION FOR OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS$6,398
CARING FOR CAMBODIA$5,000
FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$3,733
SQUADUP$3,450
KULTURECITY$2,634
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE OF FL$2,500
GROUNDS FOR SCULPTURES$2,500
SOCIAL IMPACT PARTNERS$1,052
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $64k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KULTURECITY: $3k → 16%POAC AUTISM SERVICES: $1k → 11%POAC AUTISM SERVICES: $100 → 11%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $27k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS: $250 → 4%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%CORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS: $250 → 4%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $10k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $1k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $1k → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $100 → 14%EXCEPTIONAL MINDS: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
WV
NM
TN
DC
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of The Do & Rickles Family Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Do & Rickles Family Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.9M · 41 repeat orgs$299k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
28

Total granted

$2.9M
$181k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+5%

Still filing today

68%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesInternationalRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    Profectum Foundation
    6× · 2018–2025 · $373k · revenue +14% · 27% of their budget
  • NA
    NEWARK ACADEMY
    7× · 2018–2025 · $320k · revenue +39%
  • PM
    Paper Mill Playhouse
    8× · 2018–2025 · $219k · revenue +43%

Funded once

  • FU
    FULLBRIGHT UNIVERSITY VIETNAM
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • VI
    VietBay Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -6%
  • CR
    CRISTO REY
    one grant, 2023 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nyc Autism Charter Schools

The mission of nyc autism charter schools is to provide individualized, scientifically based educational services to children with autism and other pervasive development disorders.

Education
2
Garden Academy Inc

Garden academy, inc. uses scientific data-based and accountable interventions to provide an individualized education to students with autism, so that they may lead lives of the greatest possible independence. we are committed to helping…

Education
3
Montgomery Academy

K-12 school serving students with special needs.

4
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
5
The Keswell School

The keswell school is a specialized school for children with autism spectrum disorder.

Education
6
Autism New Jersey Inc

Autism New Jersey drives statewide change and creates connections through compassionate support, expert guidance, and a deep commitment to an autism-friendly New Jersey.

7
Autism Action Partnership

To improve the quality of life of persons on the autism spectrum and their families through education, advocacy and support, thereby enabling them to be an integral part of the community.

Philanthropy
8
Autism Opportunities Foundation

We improve the lives of the people in our care affected by autism.

Health
9
Nassau Suffolk Services for the Autistic Inc

Nassau suffolk services for the autistic (nssa) offers hope to people with autism and their families by providing high quality life-long support through services which enable people with autism to function better in everday life. nssa…

Health
10
American Institute for Neuro-Integrative Development Inc Dba Giant Steps Ct

To support education, medical research, and advocacy efforts to enhance the lives of individuals diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders (asd), developmental disabilities, and related neurological impairments.

Education
11
Mentis

Mentis provides bilingual professional mental health services to people throughout the county of every age, stage, and income level.

Human Services
12
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Villa Esperanza Services and the most unlike its peers is VietBay Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsCommunity Arts CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Jewish Community Organizati…Domestic Violence ServicesPublic Library OperationsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Policy Research and AdvocacyChristian Missionary Organi…Youth Sports ProgramsIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%9%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%17%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%17%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%50%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%25%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/50
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,515

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

47 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 47 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/47
Grantees still filing
28/47
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGE — $547,735 · OtherTRUSTEES OF DARTMOUTH COLLEGEFIU FOUNDATION INC — $232,375 · OtherFIU FOUNDATION INCFULLBRIGHT UNIVERSITY VIETNAM — $100,000 · OtherFULLBRIGHT UNIVERSITY VIETNAMSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $79,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INCTHE NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $57,891 · OtherFRIENDS OF FIU EMBRACE INC — $50,000 · Other+48 more — $217,435 · Other+48 moreNEWARK ACADEMY — $319,651 · EducationNEWARK ACADEMYFULBRIGHT UNIVERSITY VIETNAM USA INC — $300,000 · EducationFULBRIGHT UNIVERSITY VI…OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $22,658 · Education+5 more — $32,958 · EducationProfectum Foundation — $372,999 · HealthProfectum FoundationAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $142,025 · HealthAUTISM SPEAKS INCInstitute for Exceptional Care — $65,500 · HealthInstitute for Except…+4 more — $11,787 · HealthPaper Mill Playhouse — $219,138 · Arts & CulturePaper Mill…GROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE INC — $37,500 · Arts & CultureGROUNDS FO…VietBay Inc — $25,000 · Arts & CultureVietBay In…+3 more — $5,100 · Arts & CultureCARING FOR CAMBODIA INC — $190,030 · International+1 more — $1,000 · InternationalPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS — $74,120 · Recreation & SportsNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC — $50,349 · Recreation & SportsEXCEPTIONAL MINDS — $59,394 · Human ServicesKultureCity — $2,634 · Human Services+2 more — $1,600 · Human Services
Other$1,284,436Education$675,267Health$592,311Arts & Culture$286,738International$191,030Recreation & Sports$124,469Human Services$63,628

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetProfectum Foundation — $372,999 over 6y, 27% of budgetNEWARK ACADEMY — $319,651 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFULBRIGHT UNIVERSITY VIETNAM USA INC — $300,000 over 3y, 8.2% of budgetPaper Mill Playhouse — $219,138 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCARING FOR CAMBODIA INC — $190,030 over 7y, 8.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $79,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS — $74,120 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetInstitute for Exceptional Care — $65,500 over 6y, 5.3% of budgetEXCEPTIONAL MINDS — $59,394 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC — $50,349 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetGROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE INC — $37,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGABLESTAGE INC — $36,592 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetVietBay Inc — $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC — $22,658 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCELEBRATE THE CHILDREN INC — $21,658 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD — $21,150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWEST MORRIS SOCCER CLUB — $15,150 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWELCOME HOME OF CHATTANOOGA — $8,587 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetSOCIAL IMPACT PARTNERS — $7,104 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetTHE ACADEMY OF CLINICAL & APPLIED PSYCHOANALYSIS INC — $6,100 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKultureCity — $2,634 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art — $2,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FILM COLLABORATIVE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC — $1,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION — $1,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPARENTS OF AUTISTIC CHILDREN POAC AUTISM SERVICES — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS NEW YORK CITY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAY YES TO EDUCATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOP EARTH CORPORATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMURALISM — $600 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetVILLA ESPERANZA SERVICES — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPitzer College — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJoshuas Stage — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY PROGRAMS — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRalston Engine Company No 1 — $400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMENDHAM TOWNSHIP LIBRARY — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budget3LPlace Inc — $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL RESCUE LEAGUE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENDHAM TOWNSHIP FIRST AID SQUAD INC — $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMID-PENINSULA BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Profectum Foundation
  • Who funds NEWARK ACADEMY
  • Who funds FULBRIGHT UNIVERSITY VIETNAM USA INC
  • Who funds Paper Mill Playhouse
  • Who funds CARING FOR CAMBODIA INC
  • Who funds AUTISM SPEAKS INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA CENTER FOR ADAPTED SPORTS
  • Who funds Institute for Exceptional Care
  • Who funds EXCEPTIONAL MINDS
  • Who funds NATIONAL YOUTH SCIENCE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GROUNDS FOR SCULPTURE INC
  • Who funds GABLESTAGE INC
  • Who funds VietBay Inc
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CELEBRATE THE CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds NETWORK FOR GOOD
  • Who funds WEST MORRIS SOCCER CLUB
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds WELCOME HOME OF CHATTANOOGA
  • Who funds SOCIAL IMPACT PARTNERS
  • Who funds THE ACADEMY OF CLINICAL & APPLIED PSYCHOANALYSIS INC
  • Who funds KultureCity
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joel P and Ricki G Robinson Family FoundationCA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joel P and Ricki G Robinson Family Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Do & Rickles Family Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 90%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Fulbright University Vietnam Usa Inc100% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven38% of income from government
  • Paper Mill Playhouse9% of income from government
  • Cornerstone Family Programs3% of income from government
  • Grounds for Sculpture Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph