· Private foundation
The Devonshire Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $35k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $318k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $1.3M
- $250k+5 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED | $290,471 |
| BOSTON FOOD FOREST COALITION | $279,600 |
| UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS | $251,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN-BOSTON | $250,000 |
| URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE | $250,000 |
| THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND (MATTAPAN FOOD AND FITNESS) | $249,843 |
| YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN | $200,000 |
| SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC | $200,000 |
| BREAKTIME UNITED INC | $180,000 |
| LOWELL PARKS AND CONSERVATION TRUST | $155,000 |
| COACHING FOR CHANGE | $127,500 |
| THE LOOP LAB | $80,000 |
| BUILDING AUDACITY INC | $55,000 |
| ROCA INC | $50,000 |
| LOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $6.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +101% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.
72 repeat relationships — 31 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SLSILVER LINING MENTORING INC5× · 2017–2023 · $812k · revenue +148%
CROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC5× · 2017–2022 · $805k · revenue +27%- LDLOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP8× · 2017–2024 · $776k · revenue +335%
Funded once
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $162k · revenue +12%- MWMYSTIC WATERSHED ASSOCIATIONone grant, 2017 · $140k
- YUYOUTHBUILD USAYOUTH ON BOARDone grant, 2020 · $125k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The mission of the roundtable is to make massachusetts the most desirable place to live, work and do business by engaging private sector executives and public leaders to ensure access to a robust, diverse and talented workforce that…
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…
To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…
The massachusetts alliance for early college (ma4ec) is a cross-sector coalition focused on significantly increasing the number of students with access to high-quality early college in massachusetts to promote college and career success…
The corporation is organized to improve the quality of life in bostons urban communities by building capacity, environmental health, and providing economic opportunity in a manner that responds directly to community needs, interests, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is More Than Words Inc and the most unlike its peers is Merck Family Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
81 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 81 of the 111 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNCORNERED INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER LINING MENTORING INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds LOUIS D BROWN PEACE INSTITUTE CORP ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL INNOVATION FORUM INC ↗
- Who funds DOC WAYNE INC ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR NONPROFIT PRACTICE INC ↗
- Who funds PRIME COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds INNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE FOR SOCIAL INNOVATION INC ↗
- Who funds BIKES NOT BOMBS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY NURTURING CENTER OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds MANOMET INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTIME UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds FATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds TECH GOES HOME INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds GREENROOTS INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds ROCA INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED SOUTH END SETTLEMENTS ↗
- Who funds MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOOP LAB INC ↗
- Who funds COACHING FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds Catie's Closet Inc ↗
- Who funds BUILDING AUDACITY ↗
- Who funds BOSTON FOOD FOREST COALITION ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN FARMING INSTITUTE OF BOSTONINC ↗
- Who funds SPOKE ART INC (FKA MEDICINE WHEEL PRODUCTIONS INC) ↗
- Who funds Resilient Coders Inc ↗
- Who funds SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC ↗
- Who funds THIRD SECTOR NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Eastern Bank Foundation · Barr Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · William E Schrafft and Bertha E Schrafft Charitable Trust · Health Resources in Action Inc · Riley Mabel Louise Tr Uwill · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Fidelity Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Devonshire Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Institute for Sustainable Communities — 100% of income from government
- Roca Inc — 78% of income from government
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp — 32% of income from government
- College for Social Innovation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Aspetuck Land Trust — 28% of income from government
- Building Audacity — 24% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
- Spoke Art Inc (Fka Medicine Wheel Productions Inc) — 22% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
- Mystic River Watershed Association Inc — 18% of income from government
- Sociedad Latina Inc — 15% of income from government
- Doc Wayne Inc — 15% of income from government
- Cambridge Camping Association Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Manomet Inc — 12% of income from government
- Groundwork Somerville Inc — 12% of income from government
- Tech Goes Home Incorporated — 10% of income from government
- Silver Lining Mentoring Inc — 10% of income from government
- Commonwealth Kitchen Inc — 9% of income from government
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Mill City Grows Inc — 7% of income from government
- Musiconnects Inc — 5% of income from government
- Wildlands Trust Inc — 5% of income from government
- Coaching for Change Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Urban Farming Institute of Bostoninc — 4% of income from government
- Friends of the Children - Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- Catie's Closet Inc — 4% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Carroll Center for the Blind Inc — 3% of income from government
- Young Man With a Plan Inc — 3% of income from government
- Company One Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Transformative Culture Project Inc F/K/a Press Pass Tv Inc — 2% of income from government
- Bikes Not Bombs Inc — 2% of income from government
- Crossroads for Kids Inc — 1% of income from government
- Greenroots Inc — 1% of income from government
- Breaktime United Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Possible Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Ceres Inc — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Devonshire Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Devonshire Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.