Loading…
Loading…
Massachusetts · Nonprofit
YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC (Massachusetts) is funded by 28 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,496,773 in grants to it, the largest being LIFE SCIENCE CARES INC ($250,000). 16 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 257 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 257 youth development nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2025
The base broadened — 1 funders to 3 as grant income moved $50k → $66k.
3 of 28 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 2% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation.
YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 17% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2019 100% · 2020 45% · 2021 57% · 2022 31% · 2023 28% · 2024 28% · 2025 46% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
9% of YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 57% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
YOUNG MAN WITH A PLAN INC is locally rooted: 89% of its grant income comes from Massachusetts funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 28 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $100k on record.
Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
66% of spending goes to programs.
99%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2025–2025), and the filings of 28funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing