Skip to content
The Devito Family Trust (Fka the Beechmont Foundation) at a glance

· Private foundation

The Devito Family Trust (Fka the Beechmont Foundation)

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$435k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$784kPhilanthropy$364kPublic Safety & Disaster$272kFood & Nutrition$228kHealth$196kEmployment$146kRecreation & Sports$110kInternational$75kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k15 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $113k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $276k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
APPALACHIAN DISASTER COALITION$135,000
T ROWE PRICE CHARITABLE DONATION$88,850
COOL KIDS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION INC$52,000
TALMAR INC$35,000
NPLB OUTDOORS$30,000
DRINK AT THE WELL INC$25,000
THE VIEW$12,500
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$10,000
CAP-21$7,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER & ONEIDA COUNTIES$5,000
MISSION 14$5,000
MARYLAND SPCA$5,000
GOODWILL FIRE COMPANY$5,000
KINDERWOOD$5,000
OLD FORGE FIRE DEPT$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $584k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FUTURES INC: $20k → 7%FUTURES INC: $25k → 11%NPLB OUTDOORS: $35k → 6%Futures Incorporated: $15k → 7%NPLB OUTDOORS: $33k → 6%Operation No Person Left Behind Outdoors: $32k → 11%NPLB OUTDOORS: $30k → 6%THE FAMILY RECOVERY PROGRAM INC: $5k → 19%TurnAround Inc: $15k → 11%Family Recovery Program Incorporated: $5k → 19%THE FAMILY RECOVERY PROGRAM INC: $5k → 19%Franciscan Center: $3k → 19%DRINK AT THE WELL INC: $25k → 19%DRINK AT THE WELL INC: $25k → 19%Drink At The Well Inc: $25k → 19%DRINK AT THE WELL INC: $25k → 19%DRINK AT THE WELL INC: $25k → 19%DRINK AT THE WELL INC: $25k → 19%HEART OF GOLD FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 19%TALMAR INC: $35k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 19%TALMAR INC: $30k → 11%Associated Catholic Charities Inc: $10k → 19%TALMAR INC: $30k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $10k → 19%TALMAR: $30k → 11%TALMAR Inc: $20k → 11%TALMAR Inc: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.0M · 31 repeat orgs$412k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
20

Total granted

$2.0M
$277k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+18%

Still filing today

71%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $135k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterPublic BenefitHealthEnvironmentArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    Operation Second Chance Inc
    5× · 2020–2024 · $325k · revenue +182%
  • F4
    Fields 4 Valor Farms Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $205k · revenue +22% · 60% of their budget
  • DA
    DRINK AT THE WELL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +339%

Funded once

  • EB
    EAGLE BAY VOLUNTEER HOSE COMPANY IN
    one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue -53% · 31% of their budget
  • DT
    DOG TAG INC
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -12%
  • PE
    PATRIOT EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM INC
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Owings Mills Volunteer Fire Company of Baltimore County Inc

Provide protection of life and property through fire prevention, suppression and emergency medical services to the community of owings mills and the citizens of baltimore county

—
2
Harford Volunteer Fire Company

To provide fire protection, rescue and ambulance services to a community of approximately 4000 people.

—
3
Alum Bank Community Fire Company

Provided Fire & Rescue Services to Alum Bank, PA and surrounding area.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Chesapeake Beach Fire & Volunteer Rescue Dept Inc

Provide volunteer fire and emergency rescue services to the general public of the city of virginia beach, virginia.

Public Safety & Disaster
5
Laurel Volunteer Rescue Squad Inc

Laurel Volunteer Rescue Squad, Inc. is a completely volunteer organization serving the citizens of Laurel, MD by providing fire, EMS, and rescue services to the citizens of the Laurel, Maryland Community.

—
6
Jacksonville Volunteer Fire Company Inc

Provide fire and ambulance service to local community in jacksonville, md and surrounding areas.

—
7
Accident Volunteer Fire Department

Volunteer fire protection serving people of accident and the vicinity, in garrett county, maryland, from loss or damage by fire and assist the rescue squad

—
8
Old Lycoming Township Volunteer Fire Company Inc

Volunteer fire company

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Moorefield Volunteer Fire Company

Volunteer fire company providing fire protection and emergency rescue services to hardy county, wv

Public Safety & Disaster
10
The Reisterstown Volunteer Fire Company of Reister

Fire Safety and Suppression

Public Safety & Disaster
11
Denton Volunteer Fire Company

Community volunteer fire company providing fire protection and fire fighting services, ambulance and rescue service and other emergency services to the town of denton, md.

Public Safety & Disaster
12
Fort Ann Volunteer Fire Companyinc

Provide fire protection for the residents of the village and town of fort ann.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fisher House Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heart of Gold Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
30/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

T ROWE PRICE CHARITABLE DONATION: $318,600 · OtherT ROWE PRICE CHARITABLE DONATIONNO PERSON LEFT BEHIND OUTDOORS: $60,000 · OtherNO PERSON LEFT BEHIND OUTDOORSTHE VIEW: $39,000 · OtherADIRONDACK EXPERIENCE INC: $28,150 · OtherPOLAR BEAR SKI CLUB: $27,215 · OtherDOG TAG INC: $50,000 · OtherDOG TAG INCCENTRAL ADIRONDACK PARTNERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY INC: $44,500 · OtherCENTRAL ADIRONDACK PARTNERSHIP FOR THE…+22 more: $246,700 · Other+22 moreDRINK AT THE WELL INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesDRINK AT THE WELL INCTALMAR INC: $146,000 · Human ServicesTALMAR INCOPERATION NO PERSONS LEFT BEHIND OUTDOORS: $130,250 · Human ServicesOPERATION NO PERSONS LEFT B…FUTURES INCORPORATED: $60,000 · Human ServicesFUTURES INCORPORATEDASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITI…+4 more: $48,000 · Human Services+4 moreOperation Second Chance Inc: $325,000 · Public BenefitOperation Second Chance I…Fields 4 Valor Farms Inc: $205,000 · Public BenefitFields 4 Valor Farms Inc+1 more: $15,000 · Public BenefitAPPALACHIAN DISASTER COALITION: $135,000 · Public Safety & DisasterAPPALACHIA…EAGLE BAY VOLUNTEER HOSE COMPANY IN: $60,000 · Public Safety & DisasterEAGLE BAY …GOODWILL FIRE COMPANY INC: $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterGOODWILL F…+4 more: $9,500 · Public Safety & DisasterCOOL KIDS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION INC: $131,000 · HealthCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $1,500 · HealthMISSION 14 INC: $75,000 · InternationalIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $45,000 · EnvironmentLAND PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $5,500 · Environment
Other$814,165Human Services$584,250Public Benefit$545,000Public Safety & Disaster$219,500Health$137,500International$75,000Environment$50,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOperation Second Chance Inc: $325,000 over 5y, 4.7% of budgetFields 4 Valor Farms Inc: $205,000 over 2y, 60% of budgetDRINK AT THE WELL INC: $150,000 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetTALMAR INC: $146,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetAPPALACHIAN DISASTER COALITION: $135,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetCOOL KIDS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION INC: $131,000 over 5y, 3.6% of budgetOPERATION NO PERSONS LEFT BEHIND OUTDOORS: $130,250 over 4y, 16% of budgetMISSION 14 INC: $75,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetFUTURES INCORPORATED: $60,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEAGLE BAY VOLUNTEER HOSE COMPANY IN: $60,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDOG TAG INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetIRVINE NATURAL SCIENCE CENTER INC: $45,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetCENTRAL ADIRONDACK PARTNERSHIP FOR THE 21ST CENTURY INC: $44,500 over 5y, 7.4% of budgetTHE MARYLAND SPCA INC: $22,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HERKIMER AND ONEIDA COUNTIES INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDYSLEXIA TUTORING PROGRAM: $20,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetThe High Country Charitable Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetLAMOILLE COMMUNITY FOOD SHARE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetHEART OF GOLD FOUNDATION INC: $15,000 over 1y, 7.7% of budgetTHE ARTS GUILD OF OLD FORGE INC: $15,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTURNAROUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGOODWILL FIRE COMPANY INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetKINDERWOOD PROGRAM LTD: $15,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetTHE FAMILY RECOVERY PROGRAM INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetLAND PRESERVATION TRUST INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetKENT ISLAND VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHURCH HILL THEATRE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADIRONDACK LEAGUE CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRANCISCAN CENTER INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetADIRONDACK HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOWN OF WEBB HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $2,700 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MARYLAND FOOD BANK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUPPERCO VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBUTLER VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $2,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGLYNDON VOLUNTTEER FIRE DEPT INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAMPSTEAD VOLUNTEER FIRE AND HOSE COMPANY NO1: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROVIDENCE VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community F…The Harry and Jeanett…T Rowe Price Program …The Community Foundat…The United Way of Cen…Peter and Vivian Falc…The John J Leidy Foun…France-Merrick Founda…Brown Advisory Charit…The Abell Foundation …David W Buck Family F…The Kleinschmidt Fami…
Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD22.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Harry and Jeanette Weinberg Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The Community Foundation of Herkimer and Oneida Counties Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Peter and Vivian Falco Family Foundation · The John J Leidy Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Brown Advisory Charitable Foundation Inc · The Abell Foundation Inc · David W Buck Family Foundation Inc · The Kleinschmidt Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Devito Family Trust (Fka the Beechmont Foundation) funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Devito Family Trust (Fka the Beechmont Foundation). Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 110%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 22%
  • Hampstead Volunteer Fire and Hose Company NO1: 68% of income from government
  • Land Preservation Trust Inc: 64% of income from government
  • Talmar Inc: 46% of income from government
  • Futures Incorporated: 43% of income from government
  • The Family Recovery Program Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Turnaround Inc: 18% of income from government
  • The Maryland Food Bank Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Franciscan Center Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Devito Family Trust (Fka the Beechmont Foundation)’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home