Skip to content
The Deutsch Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Private foundation

The Deutsch Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$16MYouth Development$7.0MHousing & Shelter$6.9MArts & Culture$6.4MPhilanthropy$5.8MHealth$5.0MEducation$4.9MEmployment$3.6MOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $432k
  • $50k–250k46 grants · $4.9M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.4M
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$189M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA$1,000,000
COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT$555,128
PEOPLE CONCERN$300,000
SKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER$250,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS$250,000
HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES$175,000
CCF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FUND$160,000
LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK$155,000
UCLA JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION$150,000
LEADERSUP$150,000
LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER$150,000
FULCRUM ARTS$150,000
VENICE FAMILY CLINIC$150,000
UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN$140,000
DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $18.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $125k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $125k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $125k → 14%HARVEST HOME: $125k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $300k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER DBA THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $175k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $175k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $175k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN: $170k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES: $180k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES: $160k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES: $160k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES: $145k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $125k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY: $145k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $125k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY: $125k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $125k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $125k → 14%FOOTHILL FAMILY SERVICE: $125k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $150k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $125k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $145k → 14%PEOPLE ASSISTING THE HOMELESS: $125k → 14%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $125k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $350k → 14%ST ANNE'S MATERNITY HOME: $326k → 14%ST ANNE'S MATERNITY HOME: $132k → 14%ST ANNE'S MATERNITY HOME: $130k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET: $330k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET: $170k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET: $155k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET: $150k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND STREET: $130k → 14%JOVENES INC: $140k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $255k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $180k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $175k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $155k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $155k → 14%LOS ANGELES YOUTH NETWORK: $155k → 14%HILLSIDES: $200k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $165k → 14%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $140k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $140k → 14%UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $135k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $150k → 14%OCEAN PARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $150k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OR
IN
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
KS
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$52M · 112 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

112 repeat relationships: 56 still active in FY2024, 56 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

112
86

Total granted

$52M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+44%

Still filing today

89%
74%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +684%
  • TP
    THE PEOPLE CONCERN
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +696%
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    7× · 2017–2023 · $1.2M · revenue +266%

Funded once

  • TF
    The Foundation for Education Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $350k · revenue +148%
  • CS
    CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $250k · revenue -16%
  • OI
    ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue -36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
2
Los Angeles Education Partnership

To advance educational equity. together with families, schools and the community, facilitate access to and opportunities for quality educational and wellness practices so that children thrive from diapers to diplomas.

—
3
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
4
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
5
South Central Los Angeles Regional Center for Dev Disabled Persons Inc

South central los angeles regional center, (sclarc), believes special needs deserve special attention. we are committed to the provision of culturally sensitive services which enhance the inherent strengths of the family and enable…

Human Services
6
Family Promise of Los Angeles

Family promise of the south bay assists families experiencing housing insecurity with short-term shelter, case management, and navigation with the goal of creating a sustainable solution for their family.

Human Services
7
Instituto De Educacion Popular Del Sur De California

strengthening the leadership and workforce skills of Day Laborers and Domestic Workers. through 5 Day Labor Centers, Workers Health Program & Mujeres en Accion using Education & outreach empowerment tools

Unclassified
8
League of California Community Foundations

The league of california community foundations promotes and strengthens community foundations in california. through collaboration and shared learning among member foundations and building partnerships with private and public entities, we…

Philanthropy
9
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
10
Trauma Informed La
Civil Rights
11
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
12
Vip Community Mental Health Center Inc

Intervening to protect and treat all victims of violence

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Safe Place for Youth Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Israels Environment. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

189 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 189 of the 220 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
49
Early backer (in before they grew)
185/189
Grantees still filing
148/189
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,297,500 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERNLos Angeles Youth Network: $1,275,000 · Human ServicesLos Angeles Youth NetworkSt Anne's Family Services: $1,168,000 · Human ServicesSt Anne's Family ServicesHATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1,087,000 · Human ServicesSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $1,070,000 · Human ServicesHILLSIDES: $945,000 · Human ServicesUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $850,000 · Human ServicesPATH: $820,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $800,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $770,000 · Human ServicesImagine Los Angeles Inc: $716,000 · Human ServicesFoothill Family Service: $700,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $695,000 · Human Services+35 more: $8,453,500 · Human Services+35 moreALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $1,108,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTSTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,050,000 · OtherTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUND…FULCRUM ARTS: $1,040,000 · OtherFULCRUM ARTSTHE SALVATION ARMY: $795,000 · OtherTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $750,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $695,000 · OtherDOOR OF HOPE: $670,000 · OtherGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $925,000 · OtherJVS SOCAL: $760,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,217,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY PARTNERSPUBLIC COUNSEL: $600,000 · Other+69 more: $7,980,500 · Other+69 moreCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,478,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA …SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $812,500 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CA…THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $800,000 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON …CCF COMMUNITY INITIATIVES FUND: $505,000 · PhilanthropyCCF COMMUNI…NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $500,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PH…REDF: $320,000 · Philanthropy+7 more: $700,000 · Philanthropy+7 moreUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,146,182 · EducationUCLA FOUND…LONG BEACH DAY NURSERY: $835,000 · EducationLONG BEACH…EVERYBODY DANCE LA: $630,000 · EducationEVERYBODY …UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $566,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…Harmony Project: $560,000 · EducationHarmony Pr…FAMILIES FORWARD LEARNING CENTER: $410,000 · EducationFAMILIES F…FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES: $355,000 · EducationFOUNDATION…The Foundation for Education Inc: $350,000 · EducationThe Founda…CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE FOUNDATION: $250,000 · EducationSTREET POETS INC: $246,600 · EducationPUENTE LEARNING CENTER: $210,000 · Education+10 more: $476,000 · Education+10 moreCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $1,675,128 · Youth DevelopmentHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $1,051,000 · Youth DevelopmentLEADERSUP: $700,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPERATION JUMP START: $540,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC: $270,000 · Youth Development+5 more: $110,000 · Youth DevelopmentHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $1,000,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $665,000 · Arts & CultureARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK: $550,000 · Arts & CultureINNER-CITY ARTS: $510,000 · Arts & CultureSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC RADIO: $470,000 · Arts & Culture24th Street Theatre Company: $355,000 · Arts & CultureTHE UNUSUAL SUSPECTS THEATRE COMPANY: $305,000 · Arts & CultureSKIRBALL CULTURAL CENTER: $250,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $222,500 · Arts & CultureWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $820,000 · HealthVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $745,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $718,000 · HealthSHIELDS FOR FAMILIES: $365,000 · HealthORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE FOR CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $200,000 · HealthHARBOR COMMUNITY CLINIC INC: $150,000 · HealthCHILD DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE: $125,000 · Health+8 more: $198,500 · Health
Human Services$20,647,000Other$17,591,000Philanthropy$6,115,500Education$6,034,782Youth Development$4,346,128Arts & Culture$4,327,500Health$3,321,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2,478,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCOALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $1,675,128 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN: $1,297,500 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetLos Angeles Youth Network: $1,275,000 over 8y, 5.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS: $1,217,500 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSt Anne's Family Services: $1,168,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION: $1,146,182 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $1,108,000 over 8y, 3.8% of budgetHATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $1,087,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC: $1,070,000 over 7y, 1.4% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES: $1,051,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetTHE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,050,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetFULCRUM ARTS: $1,040,000 over 8y, 8.5% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $1,000,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetHILLSIDES: $945,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $925,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE: $850,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLONG BEACH DAY NURSERY: $835,000 over 6y, 7.7% of budgetPATH: $820,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetWESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK: $820,000 over 6y, 19% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS: $812,500 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $800,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $800,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $770,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetJVS SOCAL: $760,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetTHE RAPE FOUNDATION: $750,000 over 6y, 4.4% of budgetVENICE FAMILY CLINIC: $745,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $718,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc: $716,000 over 6y, 9.0% of budgetFoothill Family Service: $700,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLEADERSUP: $700,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER: $695,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $695,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetDOOR OF HOPE: $670,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetTHE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT: $665,000 over 6y, 3.9% of budgetEVERYBODY DANCE LA: $630,000 over 6y, 7.9% of budgetiFoster Inc: $625,000 over 7y, 5.1% of budgetPUBLIC COUNSEL: $600,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetPARA LOS NINOS: $570,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $570,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetCHRYSALIS CENTER: $567,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $566,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAdvancement Through Opportunity & Knowledge Inc: $565,000 over 8y, 8.3% of budgetHarmony Project: $560,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK: $550,000 over 5y, 8.2% of budgetETM-LA INC: $545,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetOPERATION JUMP START: $540,000 over 6y, 14% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $525,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR RESPONSIBLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds Los Angeles Youth Network ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds St Anne's Family Services ↗
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds HATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEBOY INDUSTRIES ↗
  • Who funds THE JONSSON CANCER CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FULCRUM ARTS ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA ↗
  • Who funds HILLSIDES ↗
  • Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds LONG BEACH DAY NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds PATH ↗
  • Who funds WESTSIDE INFANT-FAMILY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds JVS SOCAL ↗
  • Who funds THE RAPE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VENICE FAMILY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Imagine Los Angeles Inc ↗
  • Who funds Foothill Family Service ↗
  • Who funds LEADERSUP ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DOOR OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE WOODEN FLOOR FOR YOUTH MOVEMENT ↗
  • Who funds EVERYBODY DANCE LA ↗
  • Who funds iFoster Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC COUNSEL ↗
  • Who funds PARA LOS NINOS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationThe Ahmanson Foundati…The Annenberg Foundat…California Community …The Rose Hills Founda…United Way IncThe Green FoundationJewish Community Foun…Liberty Hill Foundati…The California Wellne…Conrad N Hilton Found…
The Ralph M Parsons FoundationCA121.6× affinity65 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · United Way Inc · The Green Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Liberty Hill Foundation · The California Wellness Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Deutsch Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Deutsch Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • The Oregon Community Foundation: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
63report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Deutsch Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Deutsch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 220 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Deutsch’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home