Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

The Dean Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2021
14
Grants FY2021
14
Organizations funded FY2021
7%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Dean Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Weld Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The Dean Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $95k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
’17
7
’18
5
’19
7
’20
6
’21
3
’22
0
’23
0
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$1,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$79,100
Organizations funded a year
11 to 15
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
1
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 7% of the organizations The Dean Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $550 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
HealthHuman ServicesFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202114$95k7%
FY202015$29k7%
FY201914$31k14%
FY201814$27k29%
FY201711$27kn/a
84% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$261kReligion$129kEducation$22kHealth$12kHuman Services$4kYouth Development$2kFood & Nutrition$1kEnvironment$1kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2023, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($176k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Dean Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Way of Weld County Inc: $12,950 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Northern Colorado Foundation: $12,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGreeley Stampede Foundation: $6,000 over 6y, 11% of budgetAmerican Cancer Society Inc: $3,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Wyoming Foundation: $1,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWomen to Women Inc: $1,300 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWeld Food Bank: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPoudre Learning Center Foundation I: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Radio for Northern Colorado: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 9.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO17.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Tointon Family Foundation · Weld Community Foundation · Otter Cares Foundation AKA OTTERCARES FOUNDATION · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Weld Trust · Community Foundation of Northern Colorado · The Independent Charitable Gift Fund · The Denver Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Dean Foundation with peer funders

About The Dean Foundation

How much does The Dean Foundation give?
The Dean Foundation reported 14 grants totaling $94,645 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 11 and 15 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does The Dean Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2023, its largest causes are Philanthropy (57%), Religion (28%), Education (5%).
Who are The Dean Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2023: United Way of Weld County Inc ($13k), University of Northern Colorado Foundation ($13k), Greeley Stampede Foundation ($6k).
Does The Dean Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Dean Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Dean Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Colorado Gives Foundation, Tointon Family Foundation, Weld Community Foundation.
Where is The Dean Foundation based?
The Dean Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dean’s filings →

More from the funding graph