Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Dawson Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$259k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2024 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$206kEducation$62kHousing & Shelter$15kYouth Development$14kReligion$6kInternational$2kHealth$250
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$4,580
Median grant
1
States reached
$385k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REMEMBER THE ALAMO FOUNDATION$200,000
SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$19,250
HAVEN FOR HOPE$14,500
ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$6,500
ST DAVID'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$5,000
UNIVERSITY METHODIST CHURCH$4,580
THE WITTE MUSEUM$3,650
THE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$3,000
SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION$1,250
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS$1,000
SNIPSA INC$250
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY24–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $19k → 16%SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $18k → 16%ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $8k → 16%ST LUKE'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $7k → 16%ST DAVID'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 16%ST DAVID'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $5k → 16%THE WITTE MUSEUM: $4k → 16%THE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $4k → 16%THE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 16%THE WITTE MUSEUM: $2k → 16%SNIPSA INC: $250 → 16%REMEMBER THE ALAMO FOUNDATION: $200k → 16%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SAN ANTONIO INC: $250 → 16%HAVEN FOR HOPE: $15k → 16%UNIVERSITY METHODIST CHURCH: $5k → 16%SAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1k → 16%UNIVERSITY METHODIST CHURCH: $2k → 16%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS: $1k → 16%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS: $1k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

27%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$81k · 7 repeat orgs$224k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
1

Total granted

$81k
$8k

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $216k went to new ones.

50%100%’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’24’25
Arts & CultureHousing & ShelterInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $37k · revenue +9%
  • SL
    ST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF SAN
    2× · 2024–2025 · $14k
  • SD
    ST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k

Funded once

  • SA
    SCOUTING AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Antonio Area Foundation

To serve as your most trusted and impactful philanthropic partner.

Philanthropy
2
Greater Satx

The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.

—
3
Austin Habitat for Humanity Inc

Through faith in action, austin habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities and hope.

—
4
San Antonio Teachers Council

Represent public education employees in labor related matters, to include matters specific to wages, hours, and thier condition of employment.

—
5
San Antonio Medical Foundation

The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.

Health
6
San Antonio Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the san antonio hispanic chamber of commerce is to advocate in building a better san antonio through the growth and prosperity of hispanic, small minority, women-owned businesses, and hispanic professional and trade…

—
7
San Jacinto Museum and Battlefield Association

To collect and preserve significant historical materials that relate to the early history and culture of Texas and to promote the study of the history of Texas through exhibits, publications, and educational programs.

Arts & Culture
8
Sa Talent Inc Sa Works

The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…

Education
9
San Anto Cultural Arts

To foster human and community development through community-based arts.

Arts & Culture
10
Valor Texas Education Foundation

Valor's mission is to educate the whole person in authentic communities for a full human life. Through our K-12 tuition-free classical charter schools and the Valor Institute, we build communities dedicated to wisdom, virtue, and…

Education
11
Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council

Klru is a leader in public media, distinguished by its energetic engagement with the community and for the quality and creativity of content. klru illuminates the wider world of knowledge; the importance of discourse; and the many…

Arts & Culture
12
Alamo Area Mutual Housing Association

To provide housing for low to moderate income families and to create a community environment that promotes resident education, self-sufficiency, leadership, and volunteerism

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Antonio Public Library Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Remember the Alamo Foundation: $200,000 · Arts & CultureRemember the Alamo Foundation+2 more: $6,900 · Arts & CultureSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $36,750 · OtherSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOLST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF SAN: $14,000 · OtherST LUKES EPISCOPAL SCHOOL OF S…ST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $10,000 · OtherST DAVIDS EPISCOPAL SCHOOLSCOUTING AMERICA: $7,500 · OtherSCOUTING AMERICATHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $6,500 · OtherTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE…UNIVERSITY UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $6,080 · OtherUNIVERSITY UNITED METHODIST CH…+1 more: $250 · OtherHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $14,500 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $250 · Housing & ShelterJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $2,000 · International
Arts & Culture$206,900Other$81,080Housing & Shelter$14,750International$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $36,750 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHaven for Hope of Bexar County: $14,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWitte Museum: $5,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH TEXAS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN ANTONIO PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600TX17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charitable Foundation Frost F0359600 · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · San Antonio Area Foundation · Circle Bar Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Dawson Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Dawson Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Dawson Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Dawson Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dawson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph