· Private foundation
Circle Bar Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k31 grants · $562k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SAN ANTONIO ZOO | $200,000 |
| SUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN | $133,717 |
| TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $106,250 |
| CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $100,000 |
| REMEMBER THE ALAMO FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL | $60,000 |
| THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION | $53,400 |
| AID THE SILENT | $50,000 |
| PATHWAYS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES | $50,000 |
| THE CHILDREN'S SHELTER OF SAN ANTONIO | $50,000 |
| TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS | $50,000 |
| SAN ANTONIO ACADEMY | $50,000 |
| AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK | $50,000 |
| CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION | $40,000 |
| KINETIC KIDS | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
52 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $78k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +84%
- SCSUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN7× · 2017–2024 · $548k · revenue +48%
- TTTHE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION6× · 2017–2024 · $534k · revenue +66%
Funded once
- FLFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $300k
- WMWITTE MUSEUM CAPITAL CAMPAIGNone grant, 2017 · $200k
- BPBrackenridge Park Conservancyone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -54%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
San antonio foster care and adoption services inc. is a licensed child placement agency in the state of texas. the organization cares for children placed in foster care by the state of texas.
At Discovery School, our mission is to inspire and nurture the love of learning in young children and their families. The School offers an enhanced early childhood education for children 2 through 7 years to provide them with the skills…
Develop and promote the lifetime sport
The mission of sa talent, inc. is to educate and develop youth and adults into the talent needs of san antonio's current and future employers and provide services for the regional employers for the retention and growth of their local…
The mission of the san antonio medical foundation is to improvehealth care, advance biomedical science, and enhance communitywell-being by providing leadership & active stewardship of our landand other assets.
The mission of greater:satx is to lead the developemnt and diversification of san antonio regional economy through the recruitment and expansion of qualify employers and job producing investments.
The mission of San Antonio Pets Alive! is to save every adoptable dog and cat in danger of being killed at the City of San Antonio Shelter.
Publishing a local online news source. We believe a well informed and connected community is essential to making San Antonio a better place to live, work and play.
Child Advocacy
The mission of sa youth is to develop the character, strengths, talents, and skills of san antonio's high-risk urban youth through fun, safe experiences, positive learning environments, and holistic programs that inspire each individual to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Childrens Bereavement Center of South Texas and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 81 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds SUNSHINE COTTAGE SCHOOL FOR DEAF CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE TEXAS CAVALIERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDRENS BEREAVEMENT CENTER OF SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds THE CHARITY BALL ASSOCIATION OF SAN ANTONIO INC ↗
- Who funds BEXAR COUNTY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FDN TOBIN CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ART ↗
- Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Remember the Alamo Foundation ↗
- Who funds Respite Care of San Antonio Inc ↗
- Who funds TEXAS BURN SURVIVOR SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds Kinetic Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds MISSION ROAD MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds GOOD SAMARITAN CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds UNICORN CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ASSOC FOR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL ( ↗
- Who funds Brackenridge Park Conservancy ↗
- Who funds CHARITY BALL LEGACY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL DEFENSE LEAGUE OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds BATTLE OF FLOWERS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AUTISM SERVICE CENTER OF SAN ANTONIO DBA AUTISM COMMUNITY NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SAN ANTONIO CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN HOUSE ↗
- Who funds CHILD ADVOCATES SAN ANTONIO ↗
- Who funds AID THE SILENT ↗
- Who funds ST VINNYS BISTRO ↗
- Who funds ROY MAAS' YOUTH ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds AUDITORY LEARNING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF SAN ANTONIO (AUDIT) ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: San Antonio Area Foundation · Betty Stieren Kelso Foundation · Mays Family Foundation · Elizabeth Huth Coates Charitable Foundation of 1992 · Faye L & William L Cowden Charitable Foundation · Harvey E Najim Charitable Foundation · Nancy Smith Hurd Foundation · The Texas Cavaliers Charitable Foundation · Pryor Myra Stafford Char Tr F0030100 · Keith M Orme and Pat Vigeon Orme Charitable Foundation · The Charity Ball Association of San Antonio Inc · John L Santikos Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Circle Bar Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.