Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Davis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$325k
Granted FY2025still arriving
48
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$149k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$672kEducation$623kInternational$187kHealth$61kArts & Culture$19kHuman Services$17kEnvironment$17kCrime & Legal$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 48 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k43 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $31k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $259k
$1,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS' EPISCOPAL CHURCH$149,000
RED SEA FOUNDATION$110,000
ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$11,000
WESTMINSTER SCHOOLS$10,200
COBB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$2,455
WABE$2,200
GEORGIA PUBLIC BROADCASTING$2,200
CHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHARD$2,000
FAMILIES FIRST$2,000
VISION CASHIERS$2,000
VIRGINIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$2,000
CARTER CENTER$2,000
ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN$1,200
CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF GREATER BIRMINGHAM: $300 → 16%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $1k → 13%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $1k → 13%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $1k → 13%VISION CASHIERS: $2k → 18%RESPITE CARE ATLANTA: $500 → 13%VISION CASHIERS: $1k → 18%FAMILIES FIRST: $2k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $2k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $2k → 13%FAMILIES FIRST: $300 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
PA
NJ
KY
WV
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 54 repeat orgs$564k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +19% for those funded once.

54 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

54
46

Total granted

$1.1M
$562k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+19%

Still filing today

65%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RED SEA FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $180k · revenue +162% · 79% of their budget
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +1%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC
    3× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • AS
    Atlanta Speech School Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $520k · revenue +11%
  • WI
    WOMEN IN TECHNOLOGY INC
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue -29%
  • CC
    CHARLES CHRISTIAN TULLER HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -94%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Atlanta Committee for Progress Inc

ACP is a group committed to identifying and providing leadership on selected issues important to driving the economic development of the city of Atlanta and for which the ACP's active involvement will make a major difference. The ACP has a…

—
2
The Georgia Center for Nonprofits

Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…

Community Improvement
3
The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc

Atlanta is #1 for income inequality in the nation. as such, the needs in our community are pressing and we need to move with the urgency of now to address those needs. the community foundation has unequivocally embraced equity as our #1…

Philanthropy
4
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
5
Piedmont Hospital Inc

To provide healthcare marked by compassion and sustainable excellence in a progressive environment, guided by physicians, delivered by exceptional professionals, and inspired by the communities we serve.

Health
6
Georgia Advanced Technology Ventures Inc

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively as a supporting organization to and for the benefit of the georgia institute of technology to foster and support education and scientific research and economic development…

Education
7
Metro Atlanta Chamber of Commerce Inc

The corporation is a voluntary association of individuals and organizations the purposes of which are to upgrade and advance the atlanta metropolitan area in population, commerce and finance; to effect civic and social improvements; to…

—
8
Morehouse School of Medicine

Leading the creation and advancement of health equity we exist to improve the health and well-being of individuals and communities, increase the diversity of the health professional and scientific workforce, and address primary health care…

Education
9
The Atlanta Chapter the American Institute of Architects Inc

To provide education, networking opportunities, advocacy and professional industry information to the american institute of architects' atlanta chapter members.

—
10
Georgia Hospital Association

The georgia hospital association (gha) serves approximately 150 hospitals throughout georgia. its purpose is to promote the health and welfare of the public through the development of better health care for all of georgia's citizens. gha…

—
11
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
12
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Georgia Tech Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Red Sea Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

68 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 68 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
66/68
Grantees still filing
49/68
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $605,250 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCHURCH OF THE GOOD SHEPHARD: $32,900 · Other+65 more: $123,870 · Other+65 moreAtlanta Speech School Inc: $520,000 · EducationAtlanta Speech School IncThe Westminster Schools Inc: $61,200 · EducationThe Westminster Schools Inc+14 more: $32,060 · EducationTHE RED SEA FOUNDATION: $180,000 · PhilanthropyTHE RED SEA …+3 more: $3,200 · PhilanthropyBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $23,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $21,200 · HealthHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $11,000 · Health+7 more: $1,500 · HealthCOBB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCASHIERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $1,445 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $700 · Arts & CultureTREES ATLANTA INC: $9,300 · EnvironmentTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $3,175 · EnvironmentGEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESERVE INC: $500 · Environment+2 more: $600 · EnvironmentFAMILIES FIRST INC: $6,300 · Human ServicesRESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC: $3,500 · Human ServicesVISION CASHIERS INC: $3,000 · Human Services+1 more: $300 · Human Services
Other$762,020Education$613,260Philanthropy$183,200Health$56,700Arts & Culture$22,145Environment$14,575Human Services$13,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAtlanta Speech School Inc: $520,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE RED SEA FOUNDATION: $180,000 over 4y, 79% of budgetThe Westminster Schools Inc: $61,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC: $23,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC: $21,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOMEN IN TECHNOLOGY INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHighlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc: $11,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCHARLES CHRISTIAN TULLER HOUSE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 10.0% of budgetTREES ATLANTA INC: $9,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $7,300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSummit Charter School Foundation: $7,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILIES FIRST INC: $6,300 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCASHIERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC: $3,175 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $3,010 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVISION CASHIERS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPISGAH LEGAL SERVICES: $2,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGeorgia First Amendment Foundation Inc: $2,100 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetTHE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC: $2,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROBERT W WOODRUFF ARTS CENTER INC: $1,445 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHATTAHOOCHEE NATIONAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,200 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetAPPALACHIAN TRAIL CONSERVANCY: $1,150 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Atlanta Inc: $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGreenville Country Club Scholarship Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGEORGIA LEGAL SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA CONSERVANCY INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARK PRIDE INC: $1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH ATLANTA: $800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN LAW INSTITUTE: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGIA JUSTICE PROJECT INC: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFernbank Inc: $700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOVETT SCHOOL INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLONY CLUB COMMUNITY FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN HIGHLANDS RESERVE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLOVE MUST ACT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE SEENA MAGOWITZ FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBoy Scouts of America 92 Atlanta Area Council: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE RED SEA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Westminster Schools Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds Highlands Cashiers Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COBB COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLES CHRISTIAN TULLER HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds TREES ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Summit Charter School Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES FIRST INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CASHIERS HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds RESPITE CARE ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ATLANTA BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
  • Who funds VISION CASHIERS INC ↗
  • Who funds PISGAH LEGAL SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF WESTERN NORTH CAROLINA INC ↗
  • Who funds Georgia First Amendment Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE BOYCE L ANSLEY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT COMMUNITY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta IncGA32.6× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · The H Foundation · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc · Tull Charitable Foundation Inc · Tw Marian W Ottley Atlanta Main · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · The Medlin-Hale Foundation Inc · Tuw Thomas H Pitts · Crj Foundation Inc · Litowitz Foundation Inc · Sarracenia Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Davis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Davis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Davis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Davis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Davis’ filings →

More from the funding graph