Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Private foundation

The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$171k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
19
Grants FY2024
18
Organizations funded FY2023
50%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$600
Largest grant, FY2024
$60,000
Organizations funded a year
13 to 24
FY2019 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
8
Total assets, FY2024
$98k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 50% of the organizations The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 12% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving19$171k53%
FY202318$164k50%
FY202213$321k31%
FY202118$348k33%
FY202018$337k22%
FY201924$451kn/a
81% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$603kHealth$578kHuman Services$234kRecreation & Sports$108kArts & Culture$11kScience & Tech$10kReligion$7kCivil Rights$7kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2019 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 28 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 29 recipients with no EIN on record ($348k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $472,766 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Family and Children's Service of Pittsburgh: $221,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetSpecial Olympics Pennsylvania Inc: $106,800 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetThe Satell Institute: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $7,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSimon Wiesenthal Center Inc: $5,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Community Centre of York Pennsylvania: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHeights Philadelphia: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMontessori Children's House Inc: $2,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Family Services of York Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWayne Art Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKeiruv Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Montessori Children's House of Valley Forge Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChester County Food Bank: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Support Line of Delaware County Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJewish Reconstructionist Camping Corporation: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Harrisburg Area Inc: $205 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnti-Defamation League: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Chanticleer Foundation: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSurrey Services for Seniors Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Conference of Cantors Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 22.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foundation of Central PaPA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Central Pa · Ethel S C Smith No 5 Charitable Tw · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Philadelphia Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation

How much does The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation give?
The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation reported 19 grants totaling $171,251 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 13 and 24 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2023.
What does The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2019 to FY2024, its largest causes are Education (34%), Health (32%), Human Services (13%).
Who are The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2019 to FY2024: Pennsylvania State University ($596k), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia ($473k), Jewish Family and Children's Service of Pittsburgh ($221k).
Does The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 50% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Jewish Community Foundation of Central Pa, Ethel S C Smith No 5 Charitable Tw, United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey.
Where is The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation based?
The David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg Foundation is based in PA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David M and Marjorie D Rosenberg’s filings →

More from the funding graph