Skip to content

Arizona · Private foundation

The David E Reese Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$236k
Granted FY2021
6
Grants FY2021
5
Organizations funded FY2021
60%
First-time grantees FY2021
Read the full brief

Read this first · the figures below need context

80% of The David E Reese Family Foundation’s FY2022 grant dollars went to Arizona Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2022 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year The David E Reese Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $336k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

19
’17
20
’18
20
’19
18
’20
5
’21
1
’22

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

Median grant, FY2021
$40,000
Largest grant, FY2021
$165,000
Organizations funded a year
5 to 30
FY2017 to FY2021
States reached, FY2021
6
Total assets, FY2021
$113k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2021, 60% of the organizations The David E Reese Family Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 28% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $66k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
HealthEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20215$236k60%
FY202025$1.8M28%
FY201928$1.4M43%
FY201830$1.6M50%
FY201726$1.4Mn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Philanthropy$7.9MHealth$3.7MRecreation & Sports$2.3MEducation$1.9MCivil Rights$425kArts & Culture$150kEnvironment$120kInternational$65kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
VA
AZ
DC
MS
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2022, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 41 grantees
All grantees of The David E Reese Family Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Stephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP$2,255,218349%
Trustees of the Lawrenceville School$750,00030%
Denison University$500,00030%
Ability360 Inc$439,00040%
Tostan Inc$225,00041%
Planned Parenthood Arizona Inc$175,00031%
Empower College Prep$140,00041%
Thunderbird Lodge Preservation Society$110,00032%
Naval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc$102,10042%
Yavapai Exceptional Industries$100,00041%
Montage Health Foundation$100,00030%
Wheaton College$90,00020%
Grand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy$80,00040%
The Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration$60,00020%
International Medical Corps$50,00020%
Institute for Shipboard Education$40,00020%
Healing Towers Inc$40,000120%
United States Olympic and Paralympic Foundation$30,00010%
Big Sur Land Trust$25,00030%
Wadleigh Scholars Program Inc$25,000187%
Hospice of the Valley$25,00020%
Teach for America Inc$25,00010%
Mission Flyers$25,000125%
Social Venture Partners Tucson$25,00015%
Surface Creek Animal Shelter$25,000111%
Als Therapy Development Foundation Inc$25,00010%
Voter Registration Project$20,00010%
The Heard Museum$20,00040%
Ryan House$16,66711%
Pebble Beach Company Foundation$15,00030%
Envision Education Inc$10,00010%
Hg Foundation$10,0001n/a
American Friends of Alut$10,0001n/a
National Parks Conservation Association$5,00010%
Desert Botanical Garden Inc$5,00010%
Arizona Justice Project$5,00011%
Maliasili Initiatives Inc$5,0001n/a
National Aphasia Association I$1,00011%
Columbus Medical Association Foundation$1,00010%
Blood Cancer United Inc$1,00010%
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation$1,00010%

Plus 22 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.9M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The David E Reese Family Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 3 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 38 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP: $2,255,218 over 3y, 49% of budgetTrustees of the Lawrenceville School: $750,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDenison University: $500,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAbility360 Inc: $439,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTostan Inc: $225,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetPlanned Parenthood Arizona Inc: $175,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetEmpower College Prep: $140,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetThunderbird Lodge Preservation Society: $110,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetNaval Postgraduate School Foundation Inc: $102,100 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetYavapai Exceptional Industries: $100,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetMontage Health Foundation: $100,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetWheaton College: $90,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGrand Traverse Regional Land Conservancy: $80,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration: $60,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetInternational Medical Corps: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInstitute for Shipboard Education: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHealing Towers Inc: $40,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetUnited States Olympic and Paralympic Foundation: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBig Sur Land Trust: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWadleigh Scholars Program Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 87% of budgetHospice of the Valley: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMission Flyers: $25,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetSocial Venture Partners Tucson: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSurface Creek Animal Shelter: $25,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetAls Therapy Development Foundation Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVoter Registration Project: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Heard Museum: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRyan House: $16,667 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPebble Beach Company Foundation: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetEnvision Education Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Parks Conservation Association: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDesert Botanical Garden Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArizona Justice Project: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetNational Aphasia Association I: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetColumbus Medical Association Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 38.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ25.2× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The David E Reese Family Foundation with peer funders

About The David E Reese Family Foundation

How much does The David E Reese Family Foundation give?
The David E Reese Family Foundation reported 6 grants totaling $236,000 in its FY2021 IRS filing. It funded between 5 and 30 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2021.
What does The David E Reese Family Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2022, its largest causes are Philanthropy (48%), Health (22%), Recreation & Sports (14%).
Who are The David E Reese Family Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2022: Stephen J Wampler Foundation Camp WAMP ($2.3M), Trustees of the Lawrenceville School ($750k), Denison University ($500k).
Does The David E Reese Family Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2021, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The David E Reese Family Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The David E Reese Family Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Arizona Community Foundation, Silicon Valley Community Foundation, The San Francisco Foundation.
Where is The David E Reese Family Foundation based?
The David E Reese Family Foundation is based in AZ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 65 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on David E Reese Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph