Skip to content
The David & Janyce Hoyt Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The David & Janyce Hoyt Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$4.7MEducation$1.5MHousing & Shelter$650kHealth$625kHuman Services$530kRecreation & Sports$315kEnvironment$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $450k
  • $250k+2 grants · $900k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$25M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION$500,000
WORLD VISION INC$400,000
KIDS SAVE INTERNATIONAL$200,000
SEMPER FI AND AMERICA'S FUND$100,000
COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES$100,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY BILLINGS FOUNDATION & ALUMNI$20,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $650k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $100k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 10%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 11 repeat orgs$857k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +40% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
7

Total granted

$4.2M
$292k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+40%

Still filing today

73%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $565k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthInternationalEnvironmentEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KI
    KIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +56%
  • EH
    EAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC
    5× · 2017–2021 · $1.0M · revenue +28%
  • CF
    COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES
    8× · 2017–2024 · $650k · revenue +283%

Funded once

  • RV
    RUBY VALLEY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $75k · revenue +205% · 51% of their budget
  • TB
    THE BARTH SYNDROME FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • MS
    MORNING STAR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -87%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
The University of Montana Foundation

The university of montana foundation inspires philanthropic support to enhance excellence and opportunity at the university of montana.

Education
3
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
4
Mission Asset Fund

To help people become visible, active, and successful in their financial lives.

Community Improvement
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
7
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
8
Sarasota Memorial Healthcare Foundation Inc

Sarasota memorial healthcare foundation is the philanthropic partner that helps sarasota memorial health care system bring world-class care to our community.

Health
9
The Minnesota Camp Fire Foundation

Ensure camp fire minnesota's strong future. with nature as the catalyst, camp fire minnesota energizes youth to discover their spark so their futures glow brighter.

Youth Development
10
Montana Technological University Foundation

The mission of the montana tech foundation is to advance the teaching, research and public service endeavors of montana tech by generating private contributions to supplement the institution's state and federal revenues for capital,…

Education
11
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
12
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is John Muir Health Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Preemptive Love Coalition. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
13/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WORLD VISION INC: $3,501,216 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,100,000 · InternationalKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC+1 more: $80,000 · InternationalEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC: $1,045,000 · OtherEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION…JEWISH FAMILY COMMUNITY SERVICES: $200,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY COMMUNI…Individual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant reci…ST PATRICK'S EPISCOPAL DAY SCHOOL: $60,000 · Other+5 more: $167,000 · Other+5 moreJOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500,000 · HealthJOHN MUIR H…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $250,000 · HealthSEMPER FI &…RUBY VALLEY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthRUBY VALLEY…THE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION: $50,000 · HealthTHE PREEMPT…COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $650,000 · Human ServicesMontana State University Foundation Inc: $391,000 · EducationMontana State University Billings Foundation & Alumni: $40,000 · EducationMADISON COUNTY FAIRGROUNDS IMPROVEMENT FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 · Food & NutritionSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $15,000 · Recreation & Sports
International$4,681,216Other$1,647,000Health$875,000Human Services$650,000Education$431,000Food & Nutrition$250,000Recreation & Sports$65,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWORLD VISION INC: $3,501,216 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKIDSAVE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,100,000 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetEAGLE HILL FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTSINC: $1,045,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $650,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetJOHN MUIR HEALTH FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMontana State University Foundation Inc: $391,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $250,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOpen Arms Childcare Ministries: $80,000 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetRUBY VALLEY HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 51% of budgetTHE BARTH SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetMORNING STAR FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE PREEMPTIVE LOVE COALITION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMontana State University Billings Foundation & Alumni: $40,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MONTANA INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MONTANA LAND RELIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Vanguard Charitable E…The Bank of America C…Donor Advised Charita…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The David & Janyce Hoyt Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The David & Janyce Hoyt Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The David & Janyce Hoyt Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The David & Janyce Hoyt Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on David & Janyce Hoyt Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home