Skip to content

Utah · Private foundation

The Danna Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$149k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2024
10
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$7,500
Largest grant, FY2024
$85,000
Organizations funded a year
6 to 12
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
3
Total assets, FY2024
$3.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations The Danna Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 7% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
HealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterScience & TechOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving8$149k13%
FY202310$152k20%
FY20229$248k22%
FY202111$512k45%
FY20208$396k63%
FY20196$111k33%
FY20188$69k38%
FY201712$125kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$744kReligion$296kCommunity Improvement$289kHuman Services$105kHealth$88kEducation$55kYouth Development$55kPhilanthropy$50kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Lucky Duck Foundation$350,00054%
Salt Lake Interfaith Roundtable$295,0002n/a
Project Access Inc$288,70081%
Alpha Project for the Homeless$203,82760%
Yigby$70,0001n/a
Burn Institute$68,00081%
The Rachel Covey Foundation$55,00023%
Interfaith Community Services Inc$35,00020%
Wheels of Change$25,0001n/a
Utah Veterans Alliance$25,00056%
Show all 22 grantees
All grantees of The Danna Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Lucky Duck Foundation$350,00054%
Salt Lake Interfaith Roundtable$295,0002n/a
Project Access Inc$288,70081%
Alpha Project for the Homeless$203,82760%
Yigby$70,0001n/a
Burn Institute$68,00081%
The Rachel Covey Foundation$55,00023%
Interfaith Community Services Inc$35,00020%
Wheels of Change$25,0001n/a
Utah Veterans Alliance$25,00056%
Brent & Cheri Andrus Charitable Trust$25,00015%
Monarch School Project$25,00010%
Blood Cancer United Inc$20,00010%
Phenomenal Families$20,0001n/a
Volunteers of America Utah$12,50020%
Ruidoso Municipal Schools$10,0001n/a
Tifie Humanitarian$10,00010%
Mvw Relief Fund Inc$10,00011%
Utah Food Bank$6,00020%
California Fire Foundation$5,00010%
Sylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue$5,00010%
Spectrum Ministries$1,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($196k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Danna Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLucky Duck Foundation: $350,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetProject Access Inc: $288,700 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetAlpha Project for the Homeless: $203,827 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBurn Institute: $68,000 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetThe Rachel Covey Foundation: $55,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetInterfaith Community Services Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUtah Veterans Alliance: $25,000 over 5y, 5.9% of budgetBrent & Cheri Andrus Charitable Trust: $25,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetMonarch School Project: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBlood Cancer United Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVolunteers of America Utah: $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTifie Humanitarian: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMvw Relief Fund Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetUtah Food Bank: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCalifornia Fire Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSylvia Earle AllianceMission Blue: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSpectrum Ministries: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 17.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sempra FoundationCA14.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sempra Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Danna Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Danna Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Danna Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Danna Foundation

How much does The Danna Foundation give?
The Danna Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $149,050 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 6 and 12 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Danna Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Housing & Shelter (42%), Religion (17%), Community Improvement (16%).
Who are The Danna Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Lucky Duck Foundation ($350k), Salt Lake Interfaith Roundtable ($295k), Project Access Inc ($289k).
Does The Danna Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Danna Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Danna Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Sempra Foundation, American Endowment Foundation, National Philanthropic Trust.
Where is The Danna Foundation based?
The Danna Foundation is based in UT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Danna’s filings →

More from the funding graph