Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Daniel H Lawlor Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Human Services$59kArts & Culture$50kAnimals$34kPhilanthropy$33kPublic Benefit$22kHousing & Shelter$18kHealth$16kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$1.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEADS-CANINES FOR COMBAT$10,000
VALUING OUR CHILDREN$7,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$6,500
FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC$5,000
SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FDN$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
KIDS INC$2,500
MA CHAPTER OF DISABLED AMER VETS$2,500
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION$2,500
NATHAN HALE FOUNDATION$2,500
CIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$2,500
MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART$2,500
WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF BOSTON$2,000
AED FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $5k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 17%OPERATION RECOVERY INC: $10k → 16%FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $5k → 10%FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $3k → 10%FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $3k → 10%FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $3k → 10%FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $3k → 10%VALUING OUR CHILDREN: $7k → 11%VALUING OUR CHILDREN: $5k → 11%VALUING OUR CHILDREN: $3k → 11%VALUING OUR CHILDREN: $3k → 11%VALUING OUR CHILDREN: $3k → 11%VALUING OUR CHILDREN: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
CA
VA
MD
TN
NC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$311k · 26 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
9

Total granted

$311k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+8%

Still filing today

46%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePublic BenefitPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +53%
  • VO
    VALUING OUR CHILDREN INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $21k · revenue +35%
  • WF
    WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $19k · revenue +300%

Funded once

  • OR
    OPERATION RECOVERY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -94%
  • AH
    AUTISM HIGHER ED FDTN
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • PT
    PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Special Ops Survivors

Special ops survivors advances the mission "to embrace and empower surviving spouses of fallen special operations heroes to build healthy post-loss futures as they transition and rebuild their new lives." the foundation provides programs…

Human Services
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc

The tragedy assistance program for survivors (taps) is america's national nonprofit organization that has cared for the loved ones of our nation's fallen heroes since 1994. taps ensures these living legacies of service and sacrifice do not…

Health
4
Peaceful Warrior Foundation

The peaceful warrior foundation is a non-profit organization with the aim of connecting our nation's warriors with the support and care they need.at peaceful warrior we strive to help our active-duty operators & veterans be at their very…

Human Services
5
Building Homes for Heroes Inc

Building homes for heroes is determined and devoted to bringing renewed hope to our nation's injured veterans, first responders and their families. the organization builds or modifies homes, and gifts them, mortgage-free, to injured…

Housing & Shelter
6
Homes for Heroes Foundation
Housing & Shelter
7
Homes for Veterans a Nj Non Profit Corporation

Our mission is to provide a holistic approach to support veterans with disabilities by removing barriers in every aspect of their lives. this includes funding customized, barrier-free home modificationssuch as wheelchair-accessible…

Housing & Shelter
8
Soldiers of America
Human Services
9
Lead the Way Fund Inc

Army ranger lead the way fund is an active duty, casualty assistance, recovery, transition and veterans organization that provides financial support to u.s. army rangers and the families of those who have died, have been disabled or who…

Human Services
10
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
11
Quick Reaction Foundation

Quick reaction foundation (qrf) is a non-profit organization founded by veterans to provide rapid response to the developing needs of elite operators and their families from within select u.s. special operations command ("ussocom") teams.…

Public Benefit
12
America's Warrior Partnership Inc

The mission of the corporation is to support and partner with veteran- centric communities by providing a proven model, mentorship, training, consulting, software, and resources in order to advance comprehensive and holistic warrior care…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homes for Our Troops Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
9/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEADS-CANINES FOR COMBAT: $43,000 · OtherNEADS-CANINES FOR COMBATMA SOLDIERS LEGACY FUND: $12,500 · OtherMA SOLDIERS LEGACY FUNDKIDS INC: $12,000 · OtherKIDS INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHOME BASETHE RED SOX FOUNDATION: $8,500 · OtherMA CHAPTER OF DISABLED AMER VETS: $7,500 · OtherCOLLINGS FOUNDATION: $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherATHOL YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOC: $6,000 · OtherCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 · OtherAED FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 · Other+11 more: $38,500 · Other+11 moreFOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesFOR KIDS ONLY AFT…VALUING OUR CHILDREN INC: $20,500 · Human ServicesVALUING OUR CHILD…OPERATION RECOVERY INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesOPERATION RECOVER…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE NATHAN HALE FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 · Public BenefitTHE NATHAN HA…MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE USA INC: $16,000 · Public BenefitMILITARY ORDE…ELDERHEART INC: $20,000 · Arts & CultureELDERHEART I…MASSACHUSETTS FALLEN HEROES INC: $12,000 · Arts & CultureMASSACHUSETT…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FO…WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $18,500 · PhilanthropyPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 · PhilanthropySAMARITAN'S PURSE: $13,500 · ReligionAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $2,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$166,000Human Services$52,500Public Benefit$40,000Arts & Culture$39,500Philanthropy$23,500Religion$13,500Housing & Shelter$9,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE NATHAN HALE FOUNDATION INC: $24,000 over 6y, 13% of budgetFOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC: $21,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVALUING OUR CHILDREN INC: $20,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetELDERHEART INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC: $18,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetMILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE USA INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $13,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS FALLEN HEROES INC: $12,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOPERATION RECOVERY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAED FOUNDATION INC: $6,500 over 5y, 10% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE NATHAN HALE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR KIDS ONLY AFTERSCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds VALUING OUR CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds ELDERHEART INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MILITARY ORDER OF THE PURPLE HEART OF THE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS FALLEN HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIA SERVICE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds CIA OFFICERS MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AED FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Daniel H Lawlor Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Daniel H Lawlor Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Valuing Our Children Inc: 93% of income from government
  • For Kids Only Afterschool Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Daniel H Lawlor’s filings →

More from the funding graph