Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Cynthia Elkins Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$751k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$138k
Largest
01What it funds
0175% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$534kPublic Benefit$275kInternational$235kHuman Services$190kYouth Development$152kPhilanthropy$111kHealth$107kRecreation & Sports$100kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $79k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $287k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $385k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$287k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$137,500
ILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$92,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADO$55,000
JEWISH UNITED FUND$50,000
UNITED STATES HOLOCAUST MUSEUM$50,000
URBAN INICIATIVES$40,000
NSSRA FOUNDATION$40,000
BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE$38,000
LEAP$36,000
ONE TAIL AT A TIME$28,000
THE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK$20,000
PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION$15,000
BIG SHOULDERS FUND$14,000
CHICAGO FOOD DIPOSITORY$14,000
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FOUNDATION$12,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $324k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUADALUPE CENTER: $3k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $2k → 10%GUADALUPE CENTER: $2k → 10%REBECCA COPELAND FUND FOR SOCIAL JU: $2k → 8%INVEST FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%INVEST FOR KIDS: $5k → 14%URBAN INICIATIVES: $40k → 14%URBAN INICIATIVES: $39k → 14%URBAN INICIATIVES: $30k → 14%URBAN INICIATIVES: $30k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $38k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $37k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $36k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $25k → 14%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
MI
NY
IN
CT
CA
CO
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 36 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
22

Total granted

$2.7M
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+79%

Still filing today

58%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CATO INSTITUTE
    4× · 2020–2023 · $275k · revenue +93%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    5× · 2020–2024 · $199k · revenue +198%
  • BS
    BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $151k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • I
    IHMEC
    one grant, 2021 · $36k
  • BS
    BUTTERFIELD SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM
    one grant, 2021 · $18k
  • CI
    COMMUNITY IN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Gastro Intestinal Research Foundation Inc

The GI Research Foundation works to treat, prevent, and cure digestive diseases. In collaboration with the physicians and scientists at the University of Chicago Digestive Diseases Center, we fund innovative clinical and laboratory…

Health
2
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
3
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
4
Kipp Chicago Schools

The team at kipp chicago schools is guided by a simple, yet powerful mission: to create a network of excellent schools in chicago that teach our students the character and academic skills necessary to succeed in college and beyond, and to…

Education
5
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
6
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
7
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
10
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
11
The Chicago Bar Foundation

The chicago bar foundation brings the legal community together through advocacy, funding, and innovation to improve access to justice for people in need and to make the legal system more fair, equitable, and effective.

Education
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Big Shoulders Fund; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
33/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $666,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUM: $239,000 · OtherILLINOIS HOLOCAUST MUSEUMLEAP: $139,500 · OtherLEAPTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $61,000 · OtherONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $77,600 · Other+43 more: $441,900 · Other+43 moreBRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $151,000 · Human ServicesBRAVE SPACE …URBAN INITIATIVES INC: $139,000 · Human ServicesURBAN INITIA…Invest for Kids Inc: $25,000 · Human ServicesInvest for K…+2 more: $8,800 · Human ServicesThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $140,000 · Arts & CultureThe United …THE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $105,000 · Arts & CultureTHE ART CEN…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL F…+1 more: $6,000 · Arts & CultureCATO INSTITUTE: $275,000 · Public BenefitCATO INSTI…+1 more: $1,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $199,000 · InternationalJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50,000 · PhilanthropyPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $50,000 · PhilanthropyHighland Park Community Foundation: $10,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $2,000 · PhilanthropyNSSRA FOUNDATION: $58,000 · Recreation & SportsOutreach with Lacrosse Schools: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsJESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM INC: $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,625,000Human Services$323,800Arts & Culture$293,500Public Benefit$276,000International$199,000Philanthropy$112,000Recreation & Sports$79,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $275,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $199,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $151,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $140,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN INITIATIVES INC: $139,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK: $105,000 over 4y, 3.8% of budgetONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP: $77,600 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC: $61,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetNSSRA FOUNDATION: $58,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetJEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $42,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBig Shoulders Fund: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NORA PROJECT: $35,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetInvest for Kids Inc: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOutreach with Lacrosse Schools: $15,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHighland Park Community Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGuadalupe Center Inc: $7,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetWESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANOPY CENTER INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMichael Rolfe Pancreatic Cancer Foundation: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBERNIE'S BOOK BANK: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEndeavor Health Clinical Operations: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPANCREATIC CANCER ACTION NETWORK INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION KINDNESS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLight of Love Ministry: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds URBAN INITIATIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART CENTER OF HIGHLAND PARK ↗
  • Who funds ONE TAIL AT A TIME NFP ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR ENRICHED LIVING INC ↗
  • Who funds NSSRA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH UNITED FUND OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds PAT TILLMAN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Big Shoulders Fund ↗
  • Who funds THE NORA PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds Invest for Kids Inc ↗
  • Who funds Outreach with Lacrosse Schools ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Highland Park Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds JESSE WHITE TUMBLING TEAM INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN GOLF ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Federation of Metropolitan ChicagoIL15.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Meg and Tim Callahan Family Foundation · First Bank Chicago Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Cynthia Elkins Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Cynthia Elkins Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Guadalupe Center Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Cynthia Elkins Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Cynthia Elkins Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cynthia Elkins’ filings →

More from the funding graph