Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Craig Young Family Foundation Young

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$128k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$106k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$1.2MPhilanthropy$311kYouth Development$50kCommunity Improvement$46kHealth$34kEducation$33kPublic Benefit$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $106k
$600
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INSPIRING SERVICE$106,000
DEVELOP FOR GOOD$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
IMPACT 100$2,200
KINDERVELT$1,200
SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL$1,000
QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK$1,000
CINCINNATI ZOO$600
THE HILLSIDE TRUST$500
CHILDREN'S THEATER OF CINCINNATI$350
CRAYONS TO COMPUTERS$250
BIOMIMICRY$125
BEAR LEAGUE$60
MISC$52
LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$50
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHANGING GEARS: $100 → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $495k → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $225k → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $175k → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $106k → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $75k → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $73k → 16%INSPIRING SERVICE: $65k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 24 repeat orgs$63k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
25

Total granted

$1.7M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+70%
+121%

Still filing today

42%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesPhilanthropyEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IS
    INSPIRING SERVICE
    7× · 2017–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +463% · 94% of their budget
  • DF
    DEVELOP FOR GOOD
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +95%
  • GB
    GIVE BACK CINCINNATI
    2× · 2018–2020 · $25k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • JC
    JUST CAPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • SO
    SEC OF WORLD SUMMIT OF NOBEL PEACE
    one grant, 2017 · $16k
  • P
    ProKidsgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +210%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cintrifuse

To empower Cincinnati entrepreneurs to launch bold, scalable startups; and we work to improve the odds of those startups growing into transformational companies.

Community Improvement
2
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
3
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
4
Cincinnati Parks Foundation

To build broad based private/public partnerships supporting the conservation and enhancement of our City's parks and greenspaces.

Recreation & Sports
5
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber

To grow the vibrancy and economic prosperity of the cincinnati region.

—
6
Cincinnati Usa Regional Chamber Foundation

To develop and promote economic development, talent initiatives and the unique offerings in the cincinnati region.

Community Improvement
7
Cincinnati Preservation Association

To empower and educate people to value, preserve and save greater cincinnati's historic buildings, communities, landscapes and stories.

Arts & Culture
8
Philanthropy Ohio

To lead and equip ohio philanthropy to be effective partners for change in our communities.

Philanthropy
9
Greater Cincinnati Convention and Visitors Bureau Inc

The cincinnati usa convention & visitors bureau is an aggressive sales, marketing, and service organization. our primary responsibility is to positively impact the region's area economy through convention, tradeshow and visitor…

—
10
Cincinnati Observatory Center

The mission of the cincinnati observatory is to maintain the integrity and heritage of an historic 19th century observatory and to educate, engage, and inspire our community about astronomy and science.

Arts & Culture
11
Cincy Bike Share Inc

To operate red bike, the cincinnati region's bike share system, providing a transportation option, that increases mobility and adds to the vitality of the region.

Public Benefit
12
Cincinnati Museum Association

Through the power of art, we contribute to a more vibrant cincinnati by inspiring its people and connecting our communities.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crayons and Beyond Inc; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

INSPIRING SERVICE: $1,213,905 · Human ServicesINSPIRING SERVICE+1 more: $100 · Human ServicesUNITED WAY: $250,000 · OtherUNITED WAYDAN BEARD COUNCIL-BOY SCO: $49,280 · OtherDAN BEARD COUNCIL-BOY SCOSVP CINCINNATI: $36,100 · OtherSVP CINCINNATICINTI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $26,600 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS: $25,000 · OtherKINDERVELT: $24,500 · OtherCINCINNATI ZOO: $22,480 · OtherJUST CAPITAL: $20,000 · Other+31 more: $53,323 · Other+31 moreDEVELOP FOR GOOD: $26,400 · Public BenefitTri-State Trails dba CROWN Cincinnati: $1,000 · Public BenefitGIVE BACK CINCINNATI: $25,000 · Community ImprovementCOLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION: $1,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $100 · Community ImprovementIMPACT 100 INC: $18,500 · PhilanthropyCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $1,250 · PhilanthropyAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,032 · HealthINTERACT FOR CHANGE: $6,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,350 · Health+2 more: $152 · HealthProKids: $10,000 · Civil Rights
Human Services$1,214,005Other$507,283Public Benefit$27,400Community Improvement$26,100Philanthropy$19,750Health$13,534Civil Rights$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINSPIRING SERVICE: $1,213,905 over 7y, 94% of budgetDEVELOP FOR GOOD: $26,400 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetIMPACT 100 INC: $18,500 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetProKids: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $6,032 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,350 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCRAYONS AND BEYOND INC: $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNew York University: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAnthony Munoz Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HILLSIDE TRUST: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Theatre of Cincinnati: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOVER-THE-RHINE MUSEUM: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCINCINNATI NATURE CENTER: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVENTURE CREW: $207 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCincinnati Public Radio Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CINCINNATI REDS COMMUNITY FUND: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHANGINGGEARS INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAY WE HELP INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAR LEAGUE: $60 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INSPIRING SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds DEVELOP FOR GOOD ↗
  • Who funds GIVE BACK CINCINNATI ↗
  • Who funds IMPACT 100 INC ↗
  • Who funds ProKids ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI MUSEUM CENTER ↗
  • Who funds INTERACT FOR CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY NETWORK OF GREATER CINCINNATI DBA QUEEN CITY BOOK BANK ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds CRAYONS AND BEYOND INC ↗
  • Who funds Tri-State Trails dba CROWN Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO NONPROFIT ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Inter Parish Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds Anthony Munoz Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE HILLSIDE TRUST ↗
  • Who funds The Children's Theatre of Cincinnati ↗
  • Who funds OVER-THE-RHINE MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater Cincinnati FoundationOH33.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater Cincinnati Foundation · Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Elsa M Heisel Sule Charitable Trust 2005 · Duke Energy Foundation · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Thomas J Emery Memorial · Tql Foundation Inc · Millstone Fund · John a Schroth Family Char Tr · The Scripps Howard Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Interact for Change

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Craig Young Family Foundation Young funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Craig Young Family Foundation Young. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Craig Young Family Foundation Young?

    Find your warmest path to The Craig Young Family Foundation Young through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Craig Young Family Foundation Young’s filings →

    More from the funding graph