Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Cr Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20212025.

Food & Nutrition$30kHealth$28kHuman Services$17kEnvironment$9kPhilanthropy$8kAnimals$8kYouth Development$3kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$12k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASEY CARES FOUNDATION$3,105
HERITAGE CARES FOUNDATION$2,500
LAKEWOOD RANCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,375
MAGIC OF MITTENS INC$1,772
NYRR TEAM FOR KIDS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
CANCERFREE KIDS$1,000
YOUNG LIFE$500
BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT$500
99PLEDGES$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HERITAGE CARES FOUNDATION: $3k → 6%MAGIC OF MITTENS INC: $2k → 10%MAGIC OF MITTENS INC: $1k → 10%BALTIMORE SAFE HAVEN: $3k → 19%MAGIC OF MITTENS INC: $576 → 10%MAGIC OF MITTENS INC: $500 → 10%BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT: $500 → 11%BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT: $500 → 11%BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT: $250 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
OH
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
SC
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$52k · 12 repeat orgs$65k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +30% since the first grant, against -1% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
32

Total granted

$52k
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
-1%

Still filing today

58%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsPhilanthropyEducationYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CASEY CARES FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +24%
  • BA
    BALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS
    2× · 2021–2022 · $8k · revenue +30%
  • TC
    THE CAVANAGH HOUSE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • B
    BHP
    one grant, 2021 · $9k
  • G
    GOFUNDMEORGgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +26%
  • BI
    BRHP INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Miracles for Kids Inc

Miracles for kids helps families with critically-ill children battle bankruptcy, homelessness, hunger and depression so they concentrate on what is most important - fighting for their child's life.

Recreation & Sports
2
Beat Childhood Cancer Foundation Inc

Beat childhood cancer drives childhood cancer research and raises awareness, making a difference in kids' survival today. our vision is to change the story for the next family by finding viable treatments and ultimately, cures for…

Health
3
Oncology and Kids Inc

To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.

Human Services
4
The Curetivity Foundation

Provide monetary or financial aid exclusively for charitable, religious, scientific, literary or educational purposes and to solicit, receive, maintain and disburse funds for these purposes and for the betterment of children.

Health
5
Seattle Area Feline Rescue Fka Animal Talk Rescue

Safe rescue saves feline lives by taking in homeless cats, giving them the care they need, finding them loving homes, and supporting their human companions. we do this because we believe each cat has inherent value and that humans and…

Animals
6
Firefighters for Healing

The mission of firefighters for healing is to support burn and trauma survivors through direct emotional and financial support at the time they most need it. firefighters for healing provides innovative and holistic solutions to support…

Philanthropy
7
Expect Miracles Foundation

Expect miracles foundation rallies the financial services industry and byeond to invest in life-saving cancer research while advancing the financial and emotional health of people impacted by cancer. we are a 501(c)(3) public charity.

Philanthropy
8
Baltimore Fire Fighters Local 734 Widows and Orphans Charitable Benefit Plan

To provide life, sick, accident and other benefits to the members of the local, their dependents or their designated beneficiaries.

9
Animal Samaritans

At Animal Samaritans we champion compassion and respect for all living creatures, with a primary focus on dogs, cats, and the people who love them. We view pets not merely as animals, but as members of our families. As their guardians and…

Animals
10
Connors Heroes Foundation

Building a community of heroes who provide hope, guidance and support to children with cancer and their families.

Health
11
Kids Chance of Maryland Inc

Provide financial scholarships to children who have had a parent or guardian who has suffered a catastrophic or fatal accidental injury or occupational disease while working for a maryland employer

Philanthropy
12
Bounce Children's Foundation

Bounce children's foundation transforms the lives of chronically ill children, and their families, shifting all from surviving to thriving.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The One Love Foundation in Honor of Yeardley Love Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyChild and Family ServicesCancer Support OrganizationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Christian Missionary Organi…Christian Youth CampsDevelopmental Disabilities …Substance Abuse TreatmentFallen First Responder Supp…Veteran Support ServicesYouth Sports Booster Organi…Animal Rescue and Adoption
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 14. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%13%<5yr16%25%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%25%20–35yr11%4%35–55yr16%8%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%12%<5yr16%20%5–10yr19%21%10–20yr16%38%20–35yr11%1%35–55yr16%9%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 13% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
14%
5,903/41,823

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
12/24
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $21,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBHP — $8,850 · OtherBHPBRHP INC — $5,000 · OtherBRHP INCIndividual grant recipient — $4,172 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $2,977 · OtherEMMA CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · OtherMOVEABLE FEAST — $2,500 · OtherALS ASSOCIATION — $2,500 · OtherLAKEWOOD RANCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,375 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC — $2,500 · Other+20 more — $16,068 · Other+20 moreAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 · HealthAmerican H…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $2,500 · HealthSEMPER FI …CancerFree KIDS — $1,500 · HealthCancerFree…LOVE IN THE TRENCHES INC — $1,500 · HealthLOVE IN TH…PATHFINDERS FOR AUTISM — $1,000 · HealthPATHFINDER…Believe Big Inc — $924 · HealthBelieve Bi…Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc — $618 · HealthSafe Place…THE MAGIC OF MITTENS INC — $3,848 · Human ServicesTHE MAGIC…Baltimore Safe Haven Corp — $2,500 · Human ServicesBaltimore…HERITAGE CARES FOUNDATION — $2,500 · Human ServicesHERITAGE …BALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC — $1,250 · Human ServicesBALTIMORE…GOFUNDMEORG — $6,050 · PhilanthropyBALTIMORE CITY FIRE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 · PhilanthropyCASEY CARES FOUNDATION INC — $8,305 · Arts & CultureBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS — $7,500 · AnimalsHumane Society at Lakewood Ranch Inc — $260 · AnimalsTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $2,500 · EducationBRIDGES BALTIMORE INC — $500 · Education
Other$71,092Health$10,542Human Services$10,098Philanthropy$8,550Arts & Culture$8,305Animals$7,760Education$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCASEY CARES FOUNDATION INC — $8,305 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBALTIMORE ANIMAL RESCUE AND CARE SHELTER BARCS — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG — $6,050 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBaltimore Safe Haven Corp — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBALTIMORE CITY FIRE FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MARYLAND INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CAVANAGH HOUSE — $2,355 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCancerFree KIDS — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE HUNGER PROJECT LLC — $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPATHFINDERS FOR AUTISM — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYDAY BLESSINGS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DEERWOOD FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBelieve Big Inc — $924 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSafe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc — $618 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society at Lakewood Ranch Inc — $260 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · Charm City Run Foundation Inc · Edward St John Foundation Inc · France-Merrick Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Network for Good

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Cr Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 100%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 23%
  • Baltimore Safe Haven Corp28% of income from government
  • Safe Place and Rape Crisis Center Inc23% of income from government
  • Everyday Blessings Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
10get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph