Skip to content
The Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers

The council was established to promote the interests of its members, who comprise leading insurance agencies and brokerage firms.

$116k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$385kEmployment$70kPublic Benefit$60kCrime & Legal$50kCivil Rights$30kPhilanthropy$25kCommunity Improvement$20kInternational$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $90,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $115,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$15,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$55M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE$50,000
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION$15,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC$15,000
BROADFUTURES INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–23, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHE SHOULD RUN: $25k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $25k → 14%SHE SHOULD RUN: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$510k · 4 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
7

Total granted

$510k
$140k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+35%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $375k · revenue +43%
  • BROADFUTURES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $45k · revenue +26%
  • HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $30k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • II
    INDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS OF CALIFORNIA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +5%
  • II
    INSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +59%
  • GI
    GAMMA IOTA SIGMA
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
2
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
3
International Food Information Council

To effectively communicate science based information on food safety, nutrition, and health for the public good.

Arts & Culture
4
International Center for Research On Women

The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

International
5
Institute of International Bankers

The iib represents the interests of the international banking community before u.s. legislative/regulatory bodies liaises with international regulatory bodies serves as a source of information to the media and other interested parties…

—
6
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
7
International Life Sciences Institute

Ilsi is a global, nonprofit federation dedicated to generating and advancing emerging science and groundbreaking research to ensure foods are safe, nutritious and sustainable, and that they improve planetary and human health and well-being…

Science & Tech
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
10
The Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers

The council was established to promote the interests of its members, who comprise leading insurance agencies and brokerage firms.

—
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Whitman-Walker Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Broadfutures Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE INC: $375,000 · HealthFOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE INC+1 more: $10,000 · HealthINDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $50,000 · OtherINDEPENDENT INSU…GAMMA IOTA SIGMA: $25,000 · OtherGAMMA IOTA SIGMAINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS INC: $20,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL CO…SHE SHOULD RUN: $60,000 · Human ServicesSHE SHOULD…BROADFUTURES INC: $45,000 · Public BenefitHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Civil RightsINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 · InternationalBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $5,100 · Food & NutritionMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $5,100 · Food & Nutrition
Health$385,000Other$95,000Human Services$60,000Public Benefit$45,000Civil Rights$30,000Philanthropy$25,000International$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFOUNDATION TO ERADICATE DUCHENNE INC: $375,000 over 7y, 9.0% of budgetSHE SHOULD RUN: $60,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetINDEPENDENT INSURANCE AGENTS AND BROKERS OF CALIFORNIA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBROADFUTURES INC: $45,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetINSURANCE INDUSTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGAMMA IOTA SIGMA: $25,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetINTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPPING CENTERS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HEBREW UNIVERSITY INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHITMAN-WALKER FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAD FOR THE CITY INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S TABLE INC: $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers’ filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home