Skip to content
The Community Covenant Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Community Covenant Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$301k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$275kFood & Nutrition$246kInternational$185kPublic Safety & Disaster$182kHealth$144kPhilanthropy$135kYouth Development$85kEducation$71kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BONTON FARMS$50,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$40,000
UMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC$32,500
INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS$20,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$20,000
GLEANERS FOOD BANK$20,000
MEN OF NEHEMIAH$12,500
FOSTER SUCCESS$12,500
LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION$12,500
SEEDS OF HOPE INC$10,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY$10,000
CROSSFIRE KIDS$10,000
SEEDS OF CHANGE FREE CLINIC INC$10,000
FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC$7,500
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $417k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $40k → 14%MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $27k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $22k → 14%MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $13k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%MEN OF NEHEMIAH: $11k → 14%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $20k → 14%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $71k → 14%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $13k → 14%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $11k → 14%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $8k → 14%FOSTER SUCCESS: $13k → 16%FOSTER SUCCESS: $10k → 16%100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $7k → 16%100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $7k → 16%100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $6k → 16%100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $6k → 16%YMCA OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS: $10k → 16%100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $5k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 18 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$1.1M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
-1%

Still filing today

94%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalYouth DevelopmentEducationArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2020–2025 · $182k · revenue +38%
  • UP
    UMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +140%
  • LF
    LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $123k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +20%
  • IN
    INDIANA NATURAL RESOURCES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -20%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
2
Indiana University Health Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
3
Enroll Indy Inc

Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…

Education
4
People Inc

People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…

Human Services
5
Planned Parenthood North Central States Foundation

To build and maintain financial support for planned parenthood north central states to advance and protect sexual and reproductive health care for all.

Human Services
6
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
7
Planned Parenthood of Greater Washington and North Idaho

To provide exceptional reproductive and complementary health care services, honest education, and advocacy for all.

Health
8
Intrahealth International Inc

Our mission is to improve the performance of health workers and strengthen the systems in which they work.

Health
9
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
10
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
11
Partners in Food Solutions

Improve the food value chain in developing countries by mobilizing corporate volunteers to share knowledge and expertise with small and growing food processors.

International
12
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crossfire Kids. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
18/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BONTON FARMS: $100,000 · OtherBONTON FARMSGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $73,000 · OtherGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INCNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $73,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $59,000 · OtherST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOLTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $40,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 · OtherFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCOUR FRIENDS PLACE: $30,500 · OtherOUR FRIENDS PLACE+4 more: $32,500 · Other+4 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $182,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its …LIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $123,000 · Human ServicesLIFESAVERS FOUNDATIONMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $50,500 · Human ServicesMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $29,000 · Human Services100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INCFOSTER SUCCESS: $22,500 · Human ServicesFOSTER SUCCESS+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesUMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC: $165,000 · InternationalUMOJA PARTNERSH…INTERNATIONAL COMMITTEE OF THE RED CROSS: $20,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL C…THE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $135,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DALLAS …CROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $53,000 · HealthCROSSROADS…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $35,500 · HealthPLANNED PA…PLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $23,000 · HealthPLANNED PA…SEEDS OF HOPE INC: $10,000 · HealthSEEDS OF H…Crossfire Kids: $50,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentINDIANAPOLIS - MARION COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 · EducationIndianapolis Children's Choir: $4,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$446,000Human Services$417,000International$185,000Philanthropy$135,000Health$121,500Youth Development$55,500Education$12,000Arts & Culture$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $182,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUMOJA PARTNERSHIP INC: $165,000 over 6y, 8.9% of budgetTHE DALLAS FOUNDATION: $135,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFESAVERS FOUNDATION: $123,000 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC: $73,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $73,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetST RICHARD'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $59,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetCROSSROADS REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $53,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEN OF NEHEMIAH INC: $50,500 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetCrossfire Kids: $50,500 over 6y, 8.8% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC: $38,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $35,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOUR FRIENDS PLACE: $30,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $29,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD GREAT NORTHWEST HAWAII ALASKA INDIANA AND KENTUCKY: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER SUCCESS: $22,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetINDIANAPOLIS - MARION COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC: $12,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER DALLAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIndianapolis Children's Choir: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lumina Foundation for…The Indianapolis Foun…Central Indiana Commu…Lilly Endowment IncNicholas H Noyes Jr M…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…United Way of Central…Communities Foundatio…Arthur Jordan Foundat…Indiana Youth Institu…Duke Energy FoundationNational Philanthropi…
Lumina Foundation for Education IncIN21.5× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Arthur Jordan Foundation · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Community Covenant Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Community Covenant Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Community Covenant’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home