· Private foundation
Arthur Jordan Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k33 grants · $162k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $220k
- $250k+1 grant · $263k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BENJAMIN HARRISON PRESIDENTIAL SITE | $262,985 |
| INDY HUNGER NETWORK | $25,000 |
| INDIANAPOLIS SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $20,000 |
| INDIANAPOLIS CHILDREN'S CHOIR | $20,000 |
| INDIANAPOLIS OPERA | $15,000 |
| ELEVATE INDIANAPOLIS | $15,000 |
| KEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC | $12,500 |
| UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA | $12,500 |
| 100 BLACK MEN OF INDIANAPOLIS | $10,000 |
| EITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART | $10,000 |
| GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC | $10,000 |
| INDIANA HUMANITIES | $10,000 |
| MILLION MEAL MOVEMENT | $10,000 |
| OUTREACH INC | $10,000 |
| INDIANAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $242k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BHBENJAMIN HARRISON PRESIDENTIAL SITE INC8× · 2017–2024 · $3.7M · revenue +331% · 40% of their budget
- BUButler University7× · 2017–2024 · $145k · revenue +39%
- GFGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC7× · 2017–2024 · $69k · revenue +180%
Funded once
- BUBUTLER UNIVERSITY RONECKER FUNDone grant, 2023 · $50k
- SJST JOSEPH INSTITUTE FOR THE DEAFgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +28%
- UOUniversity of Indianapolisgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +38%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.
Indianapolis Downtown Marketing, Inc. (IDMI) exists to improve downtown Indianapolis. IDMI focuses on marketing downtown businesses, destinations, organizations, activities and events.
To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.
To mobilize people, ideas, and investments to make this a community where all individuals have equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity.
The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…
The Indianapolis Symphony Orchestra inspires and unites our community through our music.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
The international center is a catalyst to inform, convene, and connect public, private, and civic global objectives in indiana. for nearly half a century, the international center has served as a guide to the world's cultural landscape and…
To serve its members and local associations by providing leadership programs and services to sustain a healthy real estate market in indiana. in providing these services, the association will raise the standards of the real estate…
The mission of the international school of indiana is to provide our students with a world-class education that prepares them to be responsible citizens and effective leaders in a rapidly globalizing and interdependent world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Indiana Youth Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Urban Music Theatre Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BENJAMIN HARRISON PRESIDENTIAL SITE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Butler University ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Children's Choir ↗
- Who funds GLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Indianapolis ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA STATE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARY'S CHILD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG AUDIENCES OF INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds INDY HUNGER NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Zoological Society Inc ↗
- Who funds BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Noble Inc ↗
- Who funds EITELJORG MUSEUM OF AMERICAN INDIANS AND WESTERN ART INC ↗
- Who funds Elevate Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS ART CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA HUMANITIES COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds TMP Enterprises Inc ↗
- Who funds Indianapolis Opera Company ↗
- Who funds HEARTLAND FILM INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Music For All Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS SYMPHONIC CHOIR INC ↗
- Who funds ASCENT 121 INC ↗
- Who funds KEEP INDIANAPOLIS BEAUTIFUL INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS JAZZ FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FREETOWN VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS - MARION COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Harrison Center for the Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF INDIANAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds Indiana Black Expo Inc ↗
- Who funds Metropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Christel DeHaan Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Richard M Fairbanks Foundation Inc · Arts Council of Indianapolis Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Arthur Jordan Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Arthur Jordan Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Arthur Jordan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.